An influential right-wing think tank has released an energy policy proposal that includes support for an American carbon tax.
The American Enterprise Institute proposal -- co-written by AEI’s Steven Hayward, Brookings’ Mark Muro and the Breakthrough Institute’s Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger -- calls for a $5 per ton carbon tax, with the proceeds to be invested in energy research.
On the right-wing blog Frum Forum, author Tim Mak writes:
Perhaps the most striking thing is that a conservative think-tank has signed on to a proposal that includes an increase in taxes.
“That’s the thing I’m least enthusiastic about… [but] any new spending program has to be paid for by a revenue source. These are deficit conscious times,” explains Hayward to FrumForum. “If it’s not a carbon tax, then it has to be cutting subsidies, or higher oil and gas royalties.”
The authors argue in their paper that the $25 billion per year federal investment is necessary because private industry is dedicating too little money to research and development. The energy sector only devotes 0.3% of domestic sales to R&D, compared to industries driven by innovation, such as communications (25.6%), software (15.1%) and pharmaceuticals (11.9%).
Hayward told FrumForum that although market-oriented individuals may shudder at the thought of this type of federal intervention, the energy market isn’t currently free.
“The oil market is dominated globally by state-owned oil companies, which means that the marketplace is vulnerable to political manipulation… because it’s not a perfectly free market, I think it’s not sufficient to say ‘oh, just let the market take care of it’ and do nothing,” says Hayward.
The policy paper is labeled as ‘post-partisan’, but Hayward admits that many Republicans still don’t view climate change as being man-made, or a problem worth addressing.
The American Enterprise Institute policy paper flowed from an effort that started with a book written by Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger, Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility.
Monte Paulsen reports on carbon shift for The Tyee.
What have we missed? What do you think? We want to know. Comment below. Keep in mind:
Do:
Do not: