The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Tyee News

Hey BC Voter! Together, Let’s Dive Deep on Site C

I spent all summer reporting on the megaproject, and still have so many questions. How about you?

By Zoë Ducklow 16 Feb 2017 | The Tyee / Discourse Media

Zoë Ducklow is a multimedia journalist and photographer in BC. Her work has appeared in CBC Radio, CBC Indigenous, and Glacier Media newspapers. Find her on Twitter here.

This report is part of The Tyee’s reader-funded B.C. 2017 election coverage. To learn more about becoming a Tyee Builder, go here.

It was the flood level signs that first made me aware of Site C. Wooden signs staked along the Peace Valley in northeastern B.C. indicated the reach of the hydro project’s reservoir. Once the dam is built, the reservoir will run 83 kilometres between the towns of Fort St. John and Hudson’s Hope, submerging the scenic highway that I drove in on, which currently follows the river.

Arriving in Fort St. John, I met farmers protesting for the first time in their lives, trying to save their land. The valley that will become the reservoir is fertile farmland, and some sections have been owned by the same family for generations. Beside them were oil and gas workers, incredulous that the project had gotten so far. They’re all for development, but say this dam just doesn’t make sense.

And I met folks in Fort St. John who support the dam project. They have friends or family who’ve found work there. I also heard from some construction workers who are excited to be part of the project.

These conversations happened in the summer of 2016, when I was in the region trying to get a better sense of the $8.8-billion dam, the most expensive publically funded project ever in the province. Since then, I’ve been researching Site C: its history, its business case, its physical impact, and the reviews that have been done. In every aspect I still have questions, and I’m sure I’m not the only British Columbian who does.

So for the next few months, leading up to the provincial election on May 9, I’m going to dive deep into Site C, and I want to hear your questions about it. This investigation, jointly produced by The Tyee and Discourse Media, is going to build around what questions you, the public, want answered. So, if you’re a reader and you want us to tackle a big question about Site C, scroll down to the bottom of this story and enter it.

Photo by Zoe Ducklow.

My first question is, who needs the power? From the start, BC Hydro has talked about population growth, suggesting the power is for B.C. residents. But residential demand has been flat for years, even with steady population growth. A lot of people think the power is for liquefied natural gas producers, but that industry generally uses natural gas to power their work. After all, they’re already extracting it right there.

When I spoke with Site C spokesperson, David Conway, he couldn’t comment specifically on LNG demand because it’s not the area he covers — yet both the B.C. government and BC Hydro have touted LNG as a major source of demand for Site C’s power. I asked Conway about the last 10 years of flat residential demand, and he said, “I haven’t seen the information for the load for the last 10 years, I’d have to check that.” But BC Hydro’s published data clearly shows this trend. Shouldn’t it be easier to get answers?

Photo by Zoe Ducklow.

Demand for the power is just one of the questions that I’ve started digging into. I also want to know who benefits from this massive public project. Fort St. John? Workers? British Columbians? Contractors? And on that note, who’s really paying for it?

I’m also wondering: were local First Nations properly consulted? Why has the project not been through a review that has authority to reject it? The BC Utilities Commission, for example, could’ve served that purpose. Furthermore, have alternative energy sources been evaluated? And why is Premier Christy Clark intent on pushing the dam “past the point of no return” before the election?

My work will be part of a larger collaborative investigation project by The Tyee and Discourse Media. To get started, we’re interested in what you want to know about Site C. Tell us your questions, concerns and confusions below, and we’ll work on getting the answers.

Read more: BC Election 2017

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Are You Preparing for the Next Climate Disaster?

Take this week's poll