The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Canada needs more independent media. And independent media needs you.

Did you know that most news organizations in Canada are owned by just a handful of companies? And that these companies have been shutting down newsrooms and laying off reporters continually over the past few decades?

Fact-based, credible journalism is essential to our democracy. Unlike many other newsrooms across the country, The Tyee’s independent newsroom is stable and growing.

How are we able to do this? The Tyee Builder program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip into our editorial budget so that we can keep doing what we do best: fact-based, in-depth reporting on issues that matter to our readers. No paywall. No junk. Just good journalism.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to be Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Don’t Be Distracted by This Populist Sideshow

Political theatre is toxic to good policy. And there are greater forces at work.

By Mitchell Anderson 17 Jan 2019 |

Mitchell Anderson is a freelance writer based in Vancouver and a frequent contributor to The Tyee.

Frank Zappa, one of the great philosophers of the 20th century, once observed, “Politics is just the entertainment branch of industry.” P.T. Barnum noted, “Nobody ever lost a dollar by underestimating the taste of the American public.” These two insights go a long way in explaining the irresistible, awful presidency of Donald Trump.

The Distractor in Chief rode into the White House on a $5 billion wave of free media coverage — more than all his more dignified political opponents combined. Trump remains consistently atop an obsessive news cycle.

While the media industry and Donald Trump clearly need each other, do we really need them? As politics drifts towards spectacle, is it still relevant as far more powerful forces change our world?

For instance, Trump loudly proclaimed he would bring back the U.S. coal industry. He appointed a climate change denier to head the Environmental Protection Agency. One of the first acts of his administration was to allow coal companies to dump toxic tailings into fish-bearing waters. Yet America has seen more coal plant closures under two years of Trump than in former president Barack Obama’s entire first term.

Why? Political posturing is no match for disruptive new drilling techniques that created a glut of much cheaper natural gas. The most powerful man in the world can seemingly do nothing to hold back the tides of technological change.

A similar populist sideshow plays out in Canada. Alberta United Conservative Party leader Jason Kenney, Ontario Premier Doug Ford and federal Conservative leader Andrew Scheer and other opportunists proudly posed for a Maclean’s magazine cover to champion their shared opposition to carbon pricing. But while they were being cheerleaders for the fossil fuel industry, the energy sector was the worst performing in 2018 on the S&P 500, losing 20 per cent of stock value. At the end of the age of oil, expect further erosion of decades-old cartel discipline as producers scramble to sell carbon reserves before disruptive technologies render them worthless, whether Jason Kenney likes it or not.

The political circus can’t bring back a dying industry, but it can badly damage public policy. Mark Jaccard, an economist at Simon Fraser University, recently penned a provocative op-ed suggesting that carbon taxes are wrongheaded. Not because they don’t make economic sense, but because they can be so easily weaponized for political gain.

What good is an economic tool if it becomes fatal to a progressive government up for re-election? Jaccard points out that other policies such as flexible regulation are somewhat less efficient but vastly more politically palatable because it is hard to run a negative campaign against something as esoteric as performance standards for the cement industry. Effective climate policy needs now to be inoculated against cynical political theatre.

This growing divide between what we think is important and what actually is important is becoming increasingly dangerous. The twin pillars of the 20th century — capitalism and democracy — have worked remarkably well in achieving their goals of allowing some people to make money and maintain political power. The coming century may prove both these institutions ill-suited to weather a gathering storm of disruptive forces.

For example, the market is propelling a race towards artificial intelligence and automation because there are short-term business advantages, even as these technologies threaten to upend the very society on which a functional business environment depends.

Populist politicians cannot resist railing against progressive climate policies for similarly shortsighted reasons, even as such tactics contribute to climate catastrophe. The supposedly Darwinian dogfight of endless competition becomes ever more outdated as an effective way of managing the economy, politics — and the information we consume to make sense of it all.

As important as the media is this era of misinformation, people often forget that mainstream news organizations are first and foremost competitive business ventures. Truth and profit never align exactly, and the daily diet of lucrative clickbait served up on our ubiquitous screens leaves the world woefully unprepared for a rapidly changing future.

News, as the name implies, relates to things that are novel. Yet much of what is reported as news is relentlessly repetitive. Things that are actually new and highly disruptive, such as artificial intelligence and climate change, merit mostly a skeptical footnote in most news broadcasts — unsurprising given that car companies, telecomms and computer and electronics manufacturers make up almost one-third of advertising spending in the U.S.

Alternative media now play an increasingly important role telling stories otherwise ignored by commercial outlets. Reading and supporting these platforms is a meaningful way to diversify the diet of information available to make sense of our evolving world.

What else can be done to close the gap between spectacle and substance? Ensuring lawmakers have basic scientific literacy is a start. Incredibly, the U.S. Congress has been without an official scientific advisory body since it was eliminated in 1995. This institutional ignorance was on embarrassing display last month when elected representatives wasted a public hearing asking the CEO of Google how the Internet works. There is renewed hope that the U.S. might finally reinvest in this critical capacity.

Updating our democratic institutions would go a long way to ensuring public institutions are nimble enough to meet the challenges of the future. Sadly, electoral reform of our obsolete voting system in B.C. was likely delayed another decade by the recent referendum that garnered far less interest than it deserved. Only 42 per cent of eligible voters bothered to mail in their ballots. In contrast, 65 per cent of B.C. adults can muster the effort to go to casino or buy lottery tickets — enough to total 500 tonnes of discarded paper each year.

Most importantly we can all be much more discerning about what really constitutes news. The political soap opera will be cranked up to deafening volume, while the actual agents of accelerating change conduct their quiet transformation.

By all means enjoy the political show — but recall that, in the words of Gil Scott Heron, “the revolution will not be televised”.  [Tyee]

Read more: Politics

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities


  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other


The Barometer

What Issue Is Most Important to You This Election?

Take this week's poll