The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Dispatch from Rio’s ‘Eviction Museum’

Some 4,000 used to call the Vila Autodromo favela home. Then came the mega-sporting events.

By Bob Mackin 19 Aug 2016 |

North Vancouver-based journalist Bob Mackin, a regular contributor to The Tyee, has reported for local, regional, national and international media out-lets since 1990. Find his Tyee articles here

From afar, the two-dozen houses behind the bus lot fence resemble white shoeboxes. They are all that’s left of what was once a thriving community of red cinder-block homes amid palm trees and a lagoon. They wouldn’t be there if residents and activists didn’t resist the bulldozers for the Rio de Janeiro Olympics, which close Sunday.

Some 4,000 people used to call the Vila Autodromo favela home, mainly construction workers and fishermen. It sprouted up in the 1960s beside the city’s car racing track, on the shores of Jacarepaguá Lagoon. Residents have withstood pressure to leave since the mid-1990s, as city hall sought to develop the suburban Barra da Tijuca district with clusters of apartment towers, big box shopping malls and freeways.

Vila Autodromo was able to coexist with the Pan American Games in 2007, but then came the October 2009 decision by the International Olympic Committee to award Rio the 2016 Olympics. City hall quickly decided to relocate six communities, including Vila Autodromo. It was key, because it occupied part of the land earmarked for the Olympic Park. Specifically, the main press centre, international broadcast centre and a hotel.

“Pretty sad,” says Christopher Gaffney, a geography professor at the University of Zurich, as he gazes around the site. “This was a really long struggle and the Vila Autodromo was the canary in the coal mine for resisting Olympic removals. There were 650 families here, it was a vibrant community, there were lots of trees and an old fishers’ village. The water was progressively polluted with pharmaceutical companies and shopping malls and high-rise buildings.”

When city hall saw the opportunity for real estate speculation, Gaffney said, they “decided to wipe it off the map.”

More than one-fifth of Rio’s population resides in more than 500 favelas around the city. Because of the Olympics, Vila Autodromo became the highest profile.

Less than three-dozen residents received compensation of more than one million reais (about $300,000), mainly because they had land near the water. Many complained the compensation was not enough, because of increasing real estate prices in Barra da Tijuca. Those that resisted were subject to blackouts and missed garbage collection.

Protest graffiti on the walls of Vila Autodromo. Photo by Bob Mackin.

More than 300 families moved to a public housing complex but a couple dozen stood their ground. In April, the city agreed to build them new houses, a road, sports field and residents association facility. What’s left of Vila Autodromo stands as a silent protest, as an open air Eviction Museum with sculptures in some front yards describing the impact of mega-events on communities.

One of the original buildings remains, plastered with graffiti slogans. Another building, also festooned with slogans, was demolished on the eve of the Games. It began to attract too much attention from reporters waiting for buses to Olympic venues.

According to Rio on Watch, between 2009 and 2013 67,000 families were evicted to make way for venues and infrastructure for the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympics.

“State-sponsored terrorism in a way, to terrorize people into leaving and accepting the lower offer,” Gaffney said. “That story hasn’t been heard enough.”

Giselle Tanaka, a Vila Autodromo supporter and activist with the Popular Committee for Olympics and World Cup, said Brazil’s recession and the city, state and federal governments’ priority on staging mega-events has only made matters worse. She worries about what will happen to her city when the media goes home after the Games, and turns its attention to the next ones in Tokyo in 2020.

“The state is broke, there is no money for basic public services, there isn’t money for social services, we are very afraid of what’s going to happen,” Tanaka said. “We are more afraid really because some things the government couldn’t do, because there was much international media and everybody looking to the city seeing what happened, they will have liberty to do worse things.”

Giselle Tanaka of the Popular Committee for Olympics and World Cup, in what remains of Vila Autodromo. Photo by Bob Mackin.

Gaffney said residents of vulnerable communities in already-awarded Olympic host cities, such as PyeongChang for winter 2018, Tokyo for summer 2020 and Beijing for winter 2022, have little chance to resist. But those in Budapest, Los Angeles, Paris and Rome, cities in the running for summer 2024, can exert pressure on their politicians to avoid displacements.

Olympics, as Vancouverites know, drive the narrative of a city for a decade and the ripple effects can be felt long afterward. Just six years later, the city is grappling with record high real estate prices and record low rental vacancy rates. The highest profile pre-Olympic eviction in Vancouver, the 200-unit social housing complex at Little Mountain, awaits redevelopment by Holborn, the company behind Vancouver’s Trump Tower. Holborn did finish a 53-unit building for seniors at Little Mountain two years ago, but there are another 1,400 on the drawing board. Only 234 units would be social housing.

While sometimes the work of activists can force pockets of improvement in a host city, the mega-event inevitably diverts resources from health care and education.

“There won’t be more transparency mechanisms, there will be fewer; you’ll have a more militarized city, a gentrified city, more exclusive city and an indebted city afterwards,” Gaffney warns.

“If that’s what you want with your city, that’s fine, but that’s not a democratic choice, not an open choice, and not an informed choice. My suggestion to any city, under this stage, under this business model: don’t do it, you’re going to ruin your city.”  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Are You Preparing for the Next Climate Disaster?

Take this week's poll