We hope you found this article interesting, enough to read to the bottom. Help us publish more in 2022.

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past two years, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

We’re on a mission to add 650 new monthly supporters to our ranks to help us have another year of impactful journalism – will you join us?

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Help us hit our year-end target of 650 new monthly supporters and join Tyee Builders today.
We’re looking for 650 new monthly supporters to fund our newsroom – are you one of them?

Small independent news media are having a moment – we’re gaining supporters, winning awards, and publishing more impactful journalism than ever. We’re starting to see glimmers of a hopeful future for independent journalism in Canada.

The Tyee works for our readers, because we are funded by you. We don’t lock our articles behind a paywall, and we focus all of our energy into publishing original, in-depth journalism that you won’t read anywhere else. It’s our full-time job because readers pay us to do it.

Over the last two years, we’ve been able to double our staff team and publish more than ever. We’re gearing up for another year and we need to know how much we are working with. Thousands of Tyee readers have signed up to support our independent newsroom through our Tyee Builders program, and we’re inviting you to join.

From now until Dec. 31, we’re aiming to bring aboard 650 new monthly supporters to The Tyee to help us do even more in 2022.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Help us hit our year-end target of 650 new monthly supporters and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
News

Scientists Call for Moratorium on New Oilsands Development

Consensus not an attack on Alberta, but an argument for 'Plan B,' signatories say.

By Crawford Kilian 10 Jun 2015 | TheTyee.ca

Crawford Kilian is a contributing editor of The Tyee

Over a hundred prominent scientists in the U.S., Canada, Australia and Britain have called for a moratorium on any new projects to develop the Canadian oilsands, "unless consistent with an implemented plan to rapidly reduce carbon pollution, safeguard biodiversity, protect human health, and respect treaty rights."

In announcing their "consensus" at a press conference on Wednesday morning, the scientists pointed out that investment in further development would "double down, even quadruple down" Canada's commitment to an unsustainable energy source, leaving a "legacy for generations."

The scientists listed 10 reasons for a moratorium, which can also be found on their website OilSandsMoratorium.org. The statement concludes: "We believe the time has come for scientists to speak out about the magnitude and importance of the oil sands issue and to step forward as participants in an informed and international public dialogue. Working together, we can solve the energy problems before us. It is not too late, but the time to act is now."

The signatories represent a broad range of physical, environmental, and social sciences, with substantial numbers from western Canadian institutions including Simon Fraser University and the University of Calgary. Among them are Thomas Homer-Dixon, Mark Jaccard, Michael Byers, David W. Schindler, and Andrew Weaver.

American signatories include Michael E. Mann, James Hansen, Anne and Paul Ehrlich, as well as economics Nobel laureate Kenneth J. Arrow. All told, the signatories include 12 Fellows of the Royal Society of Canada, 22 members of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, and five members of the Order of Canada.

In a telephone news conference announcing the statement on Wednesday morning, the main signatories explained its origins and purpose. Dr. Wendy Palen of Simon Fraser University said the consensus emerged in a paper the signatories published in Nature Magazine in 2014. This led to a synthesis of the environmental, economic, and social-justice aspects of increasing development.

An argument for Plan B

Dr. Thomas Homer-Dixon of the University of Toronto said at the news conference that "The longer we wait, the worse the eventual costs will be." Canada has two options, he said: to step back from development or to "go rogue and dig ourselves deeper into our hole." He said the consensus was not an attack on Alberta, but an argument for a Plan B.

Dr. Mark Jaccard of Simon Fraser said: "Research shows we shouldn't be doubling down, even quadrupling down our investment" as fossil fuels become high-cost energy sources.

Dr. Ken Lertzman of Simon Fraser argued that "Social justice is another reason to support the moratorium." While indigenous people are most at risk from development, he said, "Consultation with them has been neglected in oil development."

In the course of the conference, the signatories answered a number of questions, pointing out that to keep carbon dioxide below 450 parts per million, further development of the oilsands beyond current production of two million barrels per day is not possible.

Dr. Thomas Sisk of Northern Arizona University warned that new energy pipelines would have "long and large impacts." David Schindler, an expert in boreal ecosystems at the University of Alberta, pointed out that such pipelines would cross hundreds of rivers and streams, "and you can't remove oil from under ice." He also noted that ice breakup in the spring poses a "formidable threat" to pipelines, and the impact of pipelines on threatened caribou populations is uncertain.

At the end of the conference, Homer-Dixon suggested that Alberta's "Plan B" might involve becoming a world leader in ultra-deep geothermal energy: "Albertans are good at drilling holes." The province could become a world leader in the selling of advanced drilling technology, he said. He also suggested possibilities in creating biodiesel from canola.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Are You Preparing for the Next Climate Disaster?

Take this week's poll