We hope you found this article interesting, enough to read to the bottom. Help us publish more in 2022.

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past two years, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

We’re on a mission to add 650 new monthly supporters to our ranks to help us have another year of impactful journalism – will you join us?

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Help us hit our year-end target of 650 new monthly supporters and join Tyee Builders today.
We’re looking for 650 new monthly supporters to fund our newsroom – are you one of them?

Small independent news media are having a moment – we’re gaining supporters, winning awards, and publishing more impactful journalism than ever. We’re starting to see glimmers of a hopeful future for independent journalism in Canada.

The Tyee works for our readers, because we are funded by you. We don’t lock our articles behind a paywall, and we focus all of our energy into publishing original, in-depth journalism that you won’t read anywhere else. It’s our full-time job because readers pay us to do it.

Over the last two years, we’ve been able to double our staff team and publish more than ever. We’re gearing up for another year and we need to know how much we are working with. Thousands of Tyee readers have signed up to support our independent newsroom through our Tyee Builders program, and we’re inviting you to join.

From now until Dec. 31, we’re aiming to bring aboard 650 new monthly supporters to The Tyee to help us do even more in 2022.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Help us hit our year-end target of 650 new monthly supporters and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Today's Big Story

The Rise of Stephen Harper

PM's first year is the number three story of 2006.

image atom

[Editor's note:  Every day this week The Tyee publishes its picks for the top stories of 2006. Today, the rise of Stephen Harper.]

Stephane Dion dominated headlines in December. But 2006 was still Stephen Harper’s year. Harper’s journey from far-right wonk to Prime Minister of Canada still seems improbable more than 11 months on. And it is our choice for the number three big story of the past year.

After the 2004 federal election, many pundits wrote Stephen Harper off. He had no charisma, they said. And he was too extreme for voters East of Saskatchewan. With his quote book stuffed with pithy put-downs (second tier-socialistic country anyone?) and his eerie Lego-like hair, Harper could never topple Paul Martin’s Liberals. Or at least that’s how it was supposed to go.

But while Martin spent the months after the election earning the nickname Mr. Dithers, Harper was relentlessly plotting strategy. He built a new team of advisors – including some from the group that helped Australia’s John Howard win three consecutive elections, and sculpted a new moderate conservatism. When the Martin government collapsed in Dec. 2005, Harper was ready.

The new team muzzled Harper’s extreme right candidates and hacked the hard edges off his platform. Out were musings on private health care and any mention of the Iraq war.  In was GST cuts, turtlenecks and praise for the Canada Health Act. “On the face of it,” The Tyee’s Tom Barrett wrote at the time, “Harper seem[ed] to have undergone the most dramatic character transformation since Ebenezer Scrooge sent the kid to buy the goose.”

It worked. With the help of an inept Liberal election team, Harper knocked Martin from power and won a minority government on Jan. 22. But had he really “evolved”? Or was the old fire-waller just waiting for a chance to jump out?

In the early months of the new government, Harper moved steadily to keep key campaign promises. He cancelled Ken Dryden’s national child-care program, lopped a point off the GST, and, based on some pretty wonky science, moved to increase both minimum and maximum sentences for violent crimes. Also ready to go was a new Federal Accountability Act (minus some key election provisions). But that spent most of the year bogged down in the Senate.

Harper also extended Canada’s military mission in Afghanistan until 2009. The move provoked a hugely mixed response. Tyee columnist Murray Dobbin called the mission a debacle designed to assuage the PM’s ego. While UBC’s Michael Byers said none of the arguments in favour of our presence held water.

But not everyone was so negative. A Canadian researcher in the area said to leave now would be equivalent to “giving Germany back to the Nazis.” Norine MacDonald, founder of the Senlis Council, does think the mission needs to be rebalanced, however, a call echoed by everyone from Gerard Kennedy to Jack Layton.

But at the end of the year, Harper remained defiant. "Rebalance the mission,” he said in a year-end interview. “What does that mean? I mean, what the hell does that mean?”

The other big thorn in the Harper platform over the last year was the environment. Harper’s line, from the beginning, was that the Kyoto Accord was a fantasy. After a decade of Liberal inaction, to reach the Kyoto milestones would cripple Canada's economy. In its stead he introduced the Clean Air Act. The Act promised deep cuts in greenhouse gas emissions… by 2050.

Politically, Harper had a mixed first year. He started on a tone-deaf note, appointing Liberal turncoat David Emerson and un-elected advisor Michael Fortier to his cabinet. He later waged a turf war with the Parliamentary press gallery, unsuccessfully resurrected the well dead gay marriage issue and introduced a Senate reform plan that seemed designed to please no one.

On the other hand, Harper handily outplayed Bloc leader Gilles Duceppe on the Quebec as nation issue, won the praise of many usual critics for doing what the Liberals couldn’t by closing the Income Trust loophole and, at worst, fought the gallery to a draw. Still despite a year long free ride granted by the Liberals never ending leadership, Harper finishes 2006 no higher in the polls than he started it.

So, has Stephen Harper evolved? Tough to say. Evolution though, may be the wrong term to use. He did, after all, appoint Stockwell Day to cabinet.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Are You Preparing for the Next Climate Disaster?

Take this week's poll