The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Idea #8: Reboot the Treaty Process

Taiaiake Alfred calls for a conference to establish some basic principles.

By Andrew MacLeod 26 Dec 2007 |

Andrew MacLeod is The Tyee's legislative bureau chief in Victoria.

image atom
Bright ideas for 2008.

[Editor's note: Rather than look back over the year that was, the Tyee is offering its readers a dozen New Ideas for the New Year. We'll publish a new one every weekday from now through Jan. 1. They're textbook cases of thinking outside the box, all of them from people trying to make B.C. a better place to live. Later in January, we'll be asking you to suggest your own new ideas for 2008, and will publish a selection.]

The provincial government made much fanfare over signing treaties with the Tsawwassen and Maa-nulth First Nations in recent months, but University of Victoria indigenous governance professor Taiaiake Alfred says they are the last two "surrender for money" treaties the province is likely to see.

Following the B.C. Supreme Court's November decision that found the Tsilhqot'in hold Aboriginal title to some 200,000 hectares of their traditional territory, Alfred says there's a growing consensus the treaty process needs to be completely restructured before it makes sense for most First Nations to continue with it or join it.

"In practical terms, it means the treaty process is going to have to stop," he says. There's little point talking with the government nation by nation. "I would redesign it. I would have a treaty conference instead. You come up with a new framework and a new draft of a unified treaty."

The conference should be held in public so the process and arguments are transparent and open, he adds. If everyone knew the arguments, he says, "I'm certain the public would be supporting the natives."

The goal would be to set out the basic principles underlying the negotiations. They would likely include starting from the point of view that, like the Tsilhqot'in, First Nations hold title to their land and the province has no jurisdiction over that land or the people. Once those principles are affirmed, says Alfred, "you can go negotiate the details with each First Nation. They're doing it ass backwards right now, and it shows."

Changing times

A decade ago, Alfred's arguments for ditching or restructuring the treaty process would have put him on the fringe even among Aboriginal leaders, but following the Tsilhqot'in decision, the ideas have become mainstream. The First Nations Summit reacted to the ruling by saying future agreements will have to recognize Aboriginal rights and title. Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, said, "Without question, the Indigenous Nations of British Columbia are on the brink of collectively exercising our sovereign authority and inherent jurisdiction over the management of the resources within our Aboriginal title lands."

Despite the publicity around the Maa-nulth and Tsawwassen treaties, Alfred says, there was little there for natives to celebrate. "The two deals they signed were the weakest links on the native front," he says. "They're the abnormal cases.... It's not a situation where this is reflective of the way things are going to go with regards to native politics."

Money not the issue

The Tsawwassen got 700 hectares of land and $14 million. The Maa-nulth got about 245 square kilometres of Vancouver Island, $73 million and a resource royalty agreement. To fix the treaty process, he says, the parties will have to shift their basic premises.

"The money aspect is trivial," says Alfred. "It's all very short term. The big question is jurisdiction and land ownership."

Both the Maa-nulth and Tsawwassen gave the province jurisdiction over their lands and governance, according to Alfred. That's too much to give away, he says, and going forward, First Nations won't have to.

Where past agreements have focused on cutting a share of mining and logging royalties to First Nations, now leaders should be free to decide to "do something radically different," he says. "The treaty process is designed to accomplish surrender."

"In order to achieve something for their people, native leaders don't need to sell out."

Related Tyee stories:


Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll