Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
Today's Big Story

Judgment Day for Treaty Process

A landmark court ruling criticizes government dealings with First Nations.

Rob Annandale 22 Nov

Rob Annandale is on staff at the Tyee.

image atom

Wednesday’s B.C. Supreme Court decision on a long-running First Nations land claim dispute could turn the province’s controversial treaty process upside down just when it was starting to deliver tangible results.

The ruling came down on the same day the provincial government and a grouping of Vancouver Island bands collectively known as the Maa-nulth were celebrating the second treaty to go through the legislature in one session after years of futility.

Justice David Vickers criticized the provincial and federal governments for a “postage stamp approach to Aboriginal title” that tries to place excessive limits on the amount of territory conceded to First Nations. He said the evidence supported Tsilhqot’in claims to Aboriginal title on about 2,000 square kilometres of land in the Chilcotin district even if the nature of the case prevented him from making his opinion binding.

The decision was the culmination of a 17-year legal fight and the judge said he hoped his ruling would not be appealed. But the government’s initial reaction suggests it is not happy with an outcome that could encourage other First Nations to expect better results from the courts than the negotiating table.

The BC Liberals, once converted to the idea of treaties, have become ardent proponents of settlements they say provide the “certainty” necessary to foster investment in BC. Both the Tsawwassen and Maa-nulth agreements have shown Victoria is willing to part with millions of dollars upfront to get deals done.

Critics of the treaty process speak instead of “extinguishment,” saying First Nations are offered small parcels of land in exchange for giving up claims on much larger ancestral territories.

Vickers also stated that the commercial exploitation of land that prompted Chief Roger William’s legal action had infringed unfairly on Tsilhqot’in land and that provinces have no right to extinguish Aboriginal title, a point that lines up with the Supreme Court of Canada’s thinking.

Speaking at the treaty celebration, Premier Gordon Campbell called the Maa-nulth agreement a milestone in reconciliation. But a BC Assembly of First Nations statement released in the court ruling’s wake vowed this latest decision would mean change. Sounds like the start of a new New Relationship.  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Get The Tyee's Daily Catch, our free daily newsletter.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

Most Popular

Most Commented

Most Emailed


The Barometer

Will the BC Conservatives’ Surge Last?

Take this week's poll