The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Canada needs more independent media. And independent media needs you.

Did you know that most news organizations in Canada are owned by just a handful of companies? And that these companies have been shutting down newsrooms and laying off reporters continually over the past few decades?

Fact-based, credible journalism is essential to our democracy. Unlike many other newsrooms across the country, The Tyee’s independent newsroom is stable and growing.

How are we able to do this? The Tyee Builder program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip into our editorial budget so that we can keep doing what we do best: fact-based, in-depth reporting on issues that matter to our readers. No paywall. No junk. Just good journalism.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to be Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Arts and Culture

Four Intriguing Copyright Cases

TYEE LIST #19: Borrowing or plagiarism? For some of these, the jury's still out.

By Ariel Fournier 7 Jul 2012 |

Ariel Fournier is a freelance journalist based in Vancouver. See her previous Tyee stories here.

image atom
'Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal.' And then they pay.

Sure, digital copyright law makes headlines today -- Bill C-11 is currently on its way to becoming law -- but don't forget there are some old-fashioned authorship issues still causing trouble too.

Copyright-infringement is nothing new to famous authors. Charles Dickens notoriously hated America for not only being abrasively un-British but for widely distributing pirated editions of his books.

Since then pirating laws have become more standard across borders, but the line between drawing inspiration from a work and stealing remains blurry.

T.S. Eliot theorized that "Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal." These are a few authors that might disagree.

1. The claim of character association:

Gold Mountain Blues is a detailed saga chronicling five generations of a family who immigrated from China and settled in Western Canada. The book weaves together an overwhelming series of interlocking narratives -- including some possibly borrowed ones.

Three authors claim there are characters and scenarios in Gold Mountain Blues lifted directly from their books. Wayson Choy, Paul Yee and Sky Lee are currently suing author Ling Zhang who published the book in Chinese in 2009, along with Penguin Canada that published the English edition and the translator Nicky Harman.

The matter has yet to be settled in court, but the suspected rip-offs became a matter of public debate when someone identifying himself initially only as a "Canadian Scholar" began highlighting similarities between the books on a Chinese language blog. The suspicions snowballed, inspiring heated reactions from readers on both sides of the issue.

Penguin Canada released a statement saying "Gold Mountain Blues does not infringe on any other work, and the accusations of 'plagiarism' are baseless and unwarranted."

Ottawa-based writer Denise Chong is not part of the lawsuit, though her book The Concubine's Children was the subject of early accusations. She sent letters to Penguin Canada emphasizing the need for an independent review of the book regarding plagiarism.

Meanwhile Zhang denies the allegations, stating she hasn't read many of the books she is accused of plagiarizing. But the drama behind the case will leave many questions of authorship unanswered even after the court presents its verdict.

2. The 'self'-plagiarism:

It seems prolific ideas-man Jonah Lehrer is his own worst enemy when it comes to intellectual theft. The recent revelation that the new New Yorker staff writer borrowed repeatedly from his own work has affected his reputation, but not his job.

When Lehrer moved his blog Frontal Cortex from Wired to the New Yorker, many posts since featured reprinted excerpts from works he'd already published. The posts have now all been amended with editor's notes to reflect the repurposing.

The magazine decided not to fire Lehrer, but the incident raised the question of just how misleading is it to repurpose your own work.

Slate magazine published an article emphasizing that pressure to produce fresh ideas may have been too much for the young writer to handle. It's not unprecedented. A recent YouTube video shows that "West Wing" and now "The Newsroom" writer Aaron Sorkin similarly may not be able to keep pace with pressure to produce an endless stream of new witicisms (or "Sorkinisms.")

Because Lehrer retained the rights to his work, there is no copyright issue with his blog posts. Self-plagiarism is not plagiarism in any legal sense, but it is ethically dubious. As Sorkin says, is it true that "more and more we seem to expect less and less of each other?"

3. The un-author-ized sequel:

Did you know there was a sequel to Catcher in the Rye? Surprised? So was J.D. Salinger. 60 years later: Coming Through the Rye is a sequel that portrays a 76-year-old Holden Caulfield wandering through the streets of New York.

The 90-year-old Salinger was not amused by the homage and launched a lawsuit over the book's publication. J.D. California (AKA Fredrik Colting) eventually settled it out of court with Salinger's estate after the famed author died. The agreement determined that the book cannot be distributed in the United States or Canada and that promotion for the book cannot play off the fact that it has been "banned."

Characters are largely protected in Canada, though satire and parody does grant some exceptions as fair dealing. So while spinoffs, fan-fiction and slash-fiction (the sexier version of fan-fiction) are common they are technically not permitted under the Canadian Copyright Act.

As a result your Tyee Fish erotic adventures are not only unsettling, they may also be illegal. The Tyee will send its cease-and-desist order very soon.

4. The 'you stole my idea'

A tale as old as time: the story of Avatar. Vancouver restaurant-owner Emil Malak is currently pursuing a case in federal court over a claim that James Cameron stole plot points, characters and concepts in Avatar from his own screenplay Terra Incognita.

After Malak threatened to launch a lawsuit in 2010, 20th Century Fox sent him a copy of the cover from the Avatar script that pre-dated his own script.

Malak claimed the cover was altered to appear as though it was written at an earlier time, and is now in court to try to obtain the original digital file. Avatar is the highest grossing movie of all time and Malak estimates he is owed $100 million if it is revealed there was plagiarism.

First, though, Malak wants to see Cameron's original screenplay. When The Tyee spoke to him over the phone, Malak said, "If he proves it's genuine, I'm gone. I will throw my hands up and accept it as divine intervention."  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Is One Art or Design Skill You Wish to Learn?

Take this week's poll