Independent
journalism that swims
against the current.
Opinion
Local Economy

The MEC Saga Shows that Canada Needs More Co-operation, Not Less

Our largest retail co-op floundering does not mean the model isn’t viable. In fact, it’s more vital than ever.

Kevin Harding 7 Oct 2020TheTyee.ca

Kevin Harding is the national spokesperson of the Save MEC campaign, a policy analyst, and an advisor to co-ops and social enterprises.

The campaign to “Save MEC” — Mountain Equipment Co-op — has rallied more than 140,000 Canadians together to save a business that is being sold to an American private equity firm. But this grassroots and groundswell campaign wasn’t about saving a retailer; it was about saving a co-op. In fighting for a member-owned, democratic business, the campaign tapped into a passion in Canadians for co-operation.

That passion, which drove thousands of people to engage on social media, sign petitions, demand support from banks and donate more than $100,000 to a legal fund to challenge the sale of the co-op, proves that what Canada needs is not another American-owned store but more co-operation — more of doing business in a different way.

For many business students and readers of the business pages, co-ops may seem like a blast from the past, from when hair was longer, and tie-dye and beads were more popular. But co-ops are neither fossils nor anachronisms. Co-ops are modern, innovative businesses that do things differently, based on principles of community and democratic involvement.

Instead of being privately owned, with a primary purpose of generating profit for investors through business activities, co-ops exist to meet the needs of their member-owners, in a democratic fashion where one member has one vote in the direction of the organization. Profit isn’t their driving force — instead, they’re driven by a connection to their members, knowing what they need, and finding creative, low-cost and collaborative ways to solve their members’ problems. They embody the idea of a democratic economy, while challenging traditional forms of business by their very existence.

Mountain Equipment Co-op was Canada’s largest retail co-op. It was formed in the 1970s after students at the University of British Columbia realized that they could work together to solve their problem — the lack of accessible and affordable mountain climbing gear — by pooling resources and buying in bulk for economies of scale. Over time it grew, and its product expanded, and it built up a membership base of more than five million people. The co-op part of Mountain Equipment Co-op wavered in strength, but it was always there.

There are thousands of examples of other co-ops that are still strong, building and supporting communities, across the country. From La Siembra in Ontario, which employs its member-owners as they source and sell fair trade chocolates (the cocoa itself produced by worker co-operatives in the Global South), to housing co-ops that provide affordable, community-owned housing across the country, to investment co-ops focused on developing local economies or car co-ops that provide transportation solutions while sharing ownership. Canada’s credit union sector, made up of financial co-ops from Desjardins to Vancity, has taken leaps in meeting member-owners’ needs, such as providing the first loans to women in their own names, or mortgages in disadvantaged neighbourhoods where the big banks would never loan. Co-ops in Canada employ hundreds of thousands and contribute billions to the GDP. These co-ops are democratic, they care for their communities, and they’re strong and successful because they engage with their member-owners to know how to keep the business running well.

Except, perhaps, in the case of Mountain Equipment Co-op, whose downfall is something that will be studied for some time. In retrospect, as the co-op grew, its leadership became more and more disconnected from its members, with more big-box retail experience than on-the-ground member connection. This led the co-op to succumb to the retail dream of massive, fast expansion — the exact opposite of the desires of many vocal members who were locked out from elections by strict rules that prioritized C-suite experience over hiking boots and granola.

The campaign to save the co-op, on the other hand, leaned heavily in the other direction: taking all volunteers as they came, democratizing participation and campaigning, collaboratively sharing communications, translation, outreach and fundraising tasks — all without any dream of personal benefit for any of the volunteers other than saving a community good. In essence, the Save MEC campaign was co-operation at its most real and its best. And it’s this essence that Canada needs more of, today.

Canada is facing significant challenges from a global pandemic and an economic shock that we haven’t seen for some time. As politicians talk about “building back better,” we need to deeply look at the principles of co-ops as a guidepost to actually building back differently, in order to build back better. We need to lean into the idea of community over personal benefit, as we realize that we can do business, meet needs, and build communities all at the same time, while including people from different walks of life and empowering them in parts of their lives where they may have felt powerless before.

And that is what co-ops do: they build community, they meet needs, and they empower. Co-ops are everywhere in Canada, and they’re not a new idea. Indigenous communities are built on principles of common good, of sharing resources and learning from each other. Co-ops live those maxims. They build on the idea that the nature of humanity is good, and that people will willingly work with each other for the good of all rather than profiting off of each other for singular benefit. In a country that is facing significant challenges, we need more of this co-operative spirit.  [Tyee]

Read more: Local Economy

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

What Environmental Impacts Are Most Concerning to You This Summer?

Take this week's poll