The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Rights + Justice
Gender + Sexuality

Trinity Western University Loses in Supreme Court

Highest court upholds right of law societies to deny accreditation to the evangelical law school.

By Katie Hyslop 15 Jun 2018 |

Katie Hyslop is The Tyee’s education and youth reporter.

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled today that the Law Societies of Upper Canada and British Columbia acted reasonably in denying accreditation to Trinity Western University’s proposed law school.

In a seven-to-two decision, the justices determined the law societies did infringe on the religious freedom of the private evangelical Trinity Western University by denying accreditation to their proposed law based on the school’s Community Covenant. The document says students must abstain from sexual intercourse outside a heterosexual marriage and students who break the covenant could be subject to discipline or expulsion.

However, the justices went on to conclude that the infringement by the law societies was reasonable because the covenant discriminates against the rights of lesbian, bisexual, gay, transgender, queer and two-spirited (LGBTQ2S+) students on the basis of their sexuality.

A spokesperson for Langley-based Trinity Western told The Tyee the university is disappointed with the ruling, but due to the complexity and length of the ruling they have much to review before deciding on the future of their law school and Community Covenant.

“We need to fully understand this decision and what it means for our hopes and dreams of a law school at Trinity Western,” said Earl Phillips, executive director of law at TWU.

Today’s rulings come after six years of battles in public and the courts of Ontario, British Columbia and Nova Scotia about whether the school’s religious freedom trumps the rights of sexual minority students, both of which are protected under Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Both the Federation of Law Societies of Canada and the BC Ministry of Advanced Education accredited the proposed school in 2014.

However the BC Law Society rescinded its decision to accredit the law school after it lost a member referendum. The ministry, facing a lawsuit filed by Vancouver resident and then-park board member Trevor Loke over the discrimination he alleged he would have faced attending the school as a gay man, also withdrew its accreditation.

Loke, a gay Christian who was applying to law schools at the time, claimed the school violated his rights to not be discriminated against based on his sexuality. His case was declared moot in 2015 by the BC Supreme Court after the ministry reversed its accreditation in 2014.

“It’s obviously the right thing for diversity in this country. What we’re really talking about here is whether we want a judicial system that’s based on merit or one that’s based on identity,” Loke said today.

“For a long time in this country we fought really, really hard to ensure that our lawyers and justices attend schools that encourage people from diverse backgrounds to attend school together, to learn together, to challenge one another. And that’s why we’ve had a fairly robust and well-serving justice system in this country that’s continued to advance equality on a number of decisions. At the heart of this matter is whether we want to uphold that, or whether we want to change it.”

TWU fought the loss of its accreditation in the BC Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, which agreed with the university’s right to operate a law school, as did the Nova Scotia Supreme Court and Court of Appeal. Ontario Supreme Court, however, ruled in favour of the Law Society of Upper Canada’s decision to not to accredit the school.

The university took both the B.C. and Upper Canada law societies’ decisions to the Supreme Court of Canada in December 2017.

Today’s ruling was based on whether the law societies were reasonable in their decision to not accredit the schools, says UBC law professor Margot Young, not about whether the societies made the right decision.

“Correctness is a much higher threshold to me, it means basically the reviewing court has to think you got it right and it’s what they would have said,” she said.

“Reasonableness less so, it’s to say you’re within a range of reasonable answers, and it was certainly reasonable to say no — that’s what the majority decided — to Trinity Western University: you can’t be recognized with this mandatory covenant condition.”

This makes the ruling distinct from the 2001 Supreme Court of Canada decision to uphold TWU’s then-proposed education program, which had been denied accreditation by the BC College of Teachers.

The college’s decision was based on whether the school’s teacher graduates would bring bias against LGBTQ2S+ people into classrooms, whereas today’s decision is based on whether the law societies were reasonable in their decision to prioritize the right to not be discriminated against based on your sexuality over the right to freedom of religion.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities


  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll