Independent
journalism that swims
against the current.
News

Electoral Reform Referendum Would Cost $300 Million: Mayrand

Chief electoral officer says Canada needs at least two years to prepare for new system.

Kyle Duggan 7 Jul 2016iPolitics

Kyle Duggan is a reporter for iPolitics, where this article first appeared.

image atom
Chief Electoral Officer Marc Mayrand says Elections Canada has already started to develop a contingency plan in case it needs to gear up for a referendum.

Canada's Chief Electoral Officer, Marc Mayrand, says it would cost about $300 million to hold a stand-alone referendum on electoral reform -- a price tag the Liberals will likely reference in the face of non-stop calls for a referendum from the Conservative benches.

Mayrand also said that if the law was changed and a referendum vote was held in conjunction with a federal election, it would cost marginally more.

He told the Commons committee studying electoral reform over the summer that Elections Canada has started to develop a contingency plan in case it needs to gear up for a referendum -- but hasn't gone beyond that.

"Nothing more," he said. "There's no procurement, there's no activities in that regard. These things take time."

On Wednesday, Conservatives grilled Minister of Democratic Institutions Maryam Monsef over her lack of clarity on the government's position on holding a referendum. In her opening remarks, Monsef made the case against holding a referendum on changing the country's electoral system, but ultimately walked back the assertion by saying it was only her personal opinion.

"My apprehension with a referendum is the possibility that it will provide an incomplete picture of what Canadians want," she told the committee yesterday.

Conservative MP Scott Reid said today he suspects that the Liberals are "trying to run out the clock" to prevent a referendum from happening.

Mayrand said previously that Elections Canada would need a bare minimum of six months to hold a referendum, should the government choose to do so, in large part due to lack of institutional memory; the last time Canada held a national referendum was in 1992, over the Charlottetown Accord. That referendum had cost just over $103 million, according to the official Elections Canada report on the 1992 federal referendum (roughly $159 million today when factoring inflation).

Mayrand 'comfortable' with law by 2017

Mayrand told the committee today that he's "comfortable" with the government's commitment to produce legislation by May 2017 that would change the electoral system, and that a new system could be in place by October 2019 for the next election -- which would meet the Liberals' goal of making 2015 the last election using first-past-the-post in Canada.

"I note that the Government has committed to having legislation in place by May 2017, which I am comfortable with."

He said Elections Canada would need at least two years to prepare for a new system.

Mayrand said his mandate would also need to be changed so that it could allow for an extensive public education campaign to explain the new voting system to Canadians.

Mayrand also fielded a number of questions Thursday from MPs about online voting. He said not to expect any kind of online voting system in place for the next election -- Elections Canada isn't prepared for it -- but he welcomed recommendations from the committee.

Former Chief Electoral Officer Jean-Pierre Kingsley was slated to testify Thursday afternoon.  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

How Are You Engaging with Black History Month?

Take this week's poll