The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

BC Fishermen Stuck in Middle of DFO Legal Battle

Union prepped for herring season as advised, now faces shutdown due to 'lack of consultation' with First Nations.

By Kristian Secher 1 Mar 2014 |

Kristian Secher is completing a practicum at The Tyee.

B.C. fishermen say they're stuck in the middle of what has turned into a legal battle between the federal fisheries department and five Nuu-chah-nulth First Nations.

The commercial herring roe fishery on the west coast of Vancouver Island, the Central Coast and Haida Gwaii is at the centre of the dispute. The largest fishermen's union in British Columbia is now urging all its members not to fish in these disputed areas.

The move follows a recent Federal Court decision to overrule the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada's (DFO) decision to reopen commercial herring roe fisheries on the west coast of Vancouver Island last week, citing "fishy" government science among the reasons for the decision.

Fishermen worry that the two remaining areas could end up closed as well and will elect not to fish there as an "act of good faith to First Nations" -- despite DFO's recommendations.

"DFO told us we could set up fisheries but now we find out that they themselves recommended the fisheries minister not to reopen them and now there's an injunction and we're not allowed to fish there," says Kim Olsen, president of United Fishermen and Allied Workers' Union, B.C.'s largest union representing fisheries workers.

Olsen says this could likely have been prevented if DFO hadn't failed to seek consultation with First Nations before moving on with the reopening plans.

"It seems like they don't have their act together," he says. "They just do these things with no proper consultations and then it results in this big kerfuffle that we're in right now."

Court accuses DFO of 'fudging the numbers'

Fifty fishermen have applied and paid for fishing licences on the west coast of Vancouver Island for their 2014 fisheries and will have to relocate because of the injunction. They're all out money and time spent getting a business plan together to go out and catch fish, says Olsen.

"We're ultimately shut down due to DFO's lack of consultation process," he says.

The west coast Vancouver Island and Central Coast have been closed for commercial herring roe fisheries since 2006 when the herring stock was deemed too low to sustain commercial fisheries. The areas around Haida Gwaii have been closed even longer.

So it came as a surprise when fisheries minister Gail Shea announced on Dec. 23, 2013 that the three areas would be reopened to a "conservative" harvest rate of 10 per cent and invited commercial fishermen to pick them for their 2014 fisheries.

The minister's decision came despite recommendations from her own scientists not to reopen the west coast of Vancouver Island, Central Coast, and the Haida Gwaii as an internal document made public in court revealed.

First Nations immediately opposed the minister's decision and five Nuu-chah-nulth nations subsequently filed an injunction against the reopening of the fisheries in which they claimed their aboriginal territorial rights were being overstepped by the DFO's decision to reopen the commercial herring fisheries.

On Feb. 21, 2014, Federal Judge Leonard Mandamin ruled in favour of the injunction, noting that DFO's decision to reopen the areas at a total allowable catch of 10 per cent instead of 20 per cent was, in his view: "fudging the numbers."

"It is not science-based, but in effect a statement 'there is a conservation concern here, but if the fishery is to be opened, take less,'" he wrote, noting that the DFO's approach was used to sidestep the conservation assessment.

"It seems to me once the minister and the DFO depart from science-based assessments the integrity of fisheries management system is harmed," the judge wrote.

Commercial fishermen fear confrontation

Olsen says he still feels confident with DFO's science despite the department's internal confusion.

"There's probably enough fish to prosecute a fishery," he says -- but with the vocal opposition from First Nations in all three areas he dares not recommend his members to pursue it for fear of open confrontations.

"Somehow it always ends up that the fishermen are the bad guys and that we provoked it, yet it was DFO who recommended fishing there in the first place," says Olsen.

His problem with DFO's science is who pays for it. Last year, the DFO asked the industry to pay half the expenses for the herring stock assessment for 2014, he says.

This amounted to $500,000 which herring fishermen covered by agreeing to pay $25 per tonne of the total assessed herring stock up front. "Even if we don't catch that much," says Olsen.

With the injunction in place on the west coast of Vancouver Island, Olsen says that commercial herring fishermen are out 1,900 tonnes which they paid DFO to have assessed.

"That’s a direct cost to the fishermen and it ultimately comes out of the crew share," says Olsen.

Herring fishermen who picked west coast of Vancouver Island -- and possibly Central Coast or Haida Gwaii -- will now have to fish in the Strait of Georgia or Prince Rupert if they applied for licences in those areas. If not, "they don't get any money for what they picked," says Olsen. "They're out of the water and have to sit on the beach."

Sophie Doucet, director of communications for the minister's office explained to The Tyee by email that the decision to reopen the herring fishery was based on "solid fisheries science."

"Recent stock forecasts have shown that herring stock abundance has increased above the commercial fishery cut-off point in these areas," Doucet wrote, adding that the injunction has not affected commercial roe herring fishery openings elsewhere in British Columbia.

"In these areas we continue to work with the industry and First Nations in advance of the opening of the fishing season."

The minister's office and DFO declined to comment further as they are currently reviewing the Federal Court's written decision.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll