We hope you found this article interesting, enough to read to the bottom. Help us publish more in 2022.

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past two years, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

We’re on a mission to add 650 new monthly supporters to our ranks to help us have another year of impactful journalism – will you join us?

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Help us hit our year-end target of 650 new monthly supporters and join Tyee Builders today.
We’re looking for 650 new monthly supporters to fund our newsroom – are you one of them?

Small independent news media are having a moment – we’re gaining supporters, winning awards, and publishing more impactful journalism than ever. We’re starting to see glimmers of a hopeful future for independent journalism in Canada.

The Tyee works for our readers, because we are funded by you. We don’t lock our articles behind a paywall, and we focus all of our energy into publishing original, in-depth journalism that you won’t read anywhere else. It’s our full-time job because readers pay us to do it.

Over the last two years, we’ve been able to double our staff team and publish more than ever. We’re gearing up for another year and we need to know how much we are working with. Thousands of Tyee readers have signed up to support our independent newsroom through our Tyee Builders program, and we’re inviting you to join.

From now until Dec. 31, we’re aiming to bring aboard 650 new monthly supporters to The Tyee to help us do even more in 2022.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Help us hit our year-end target of 650 new monthly supporters and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Views

Harper's Plan to Make You Fear Minority Governments

He gummed up Parliament for a reason.

By David Sachs 26 Sep 2008 | TheTyee.ca

Chelsea, Quebec-based David Sachs is a Conservative communications consultant and national affairs commentator who has written for the Montreal Gazette, National Post and many other publications.

image atom
Scripting the carnival.

In the last election, the Paul Martin liberals used the tried and true "hidden agenda" attack on the Stephen Harper Conservatives and were gobsmacked to find the smear didn't stick. How could it?

Harper had been in the public eye too long. After years in Parliament, how hidden could anyone's agenda be? If Harper really had kept an agenda under wraps all those years, he probably would have forgotten it. Most of us can't even remember where we keep our car keys if we don't drive every day.

The media tarred Martin for running on yesterday's game plan, just as sports columnists blamed Leafs coach Pat Quinn for failing to adjust to the New NHL. But that hindsight insight hasn't stopped our favourite pundits from recycling slightly used storylines from the last two elections this time around.

So it is that the newspapers' collected wisdom once again is that winning polls are Harper's enemy, and that Harper himself will do all he can to downplay the Conservatives chances of forming a majority.

Which is strange, because if we look at another favourite media narrative, we might understand why this first one no longer holds true.

Minority mayhem?

Pundits have long parroted the idea that Harper plays politics as a chess match, several moves ahead, yet they seem almost impotent in applying that wisdom to actual events. In fact, while the opposition parties and media seem anxious to replay history, Harper has learned from it. In the previous two elections, when polls showed Harper flirting with majority territory, his support vanished. So, Harper understood he must make minority government itself unpalatable.

While the Harper communications cabal has shown itself tone-deaf in many instances, they have demonstrated one impressive ability: the understanding of how much the Canadian voters will retain from non-election political news. They have taken advantage of this by stonewalling accusations from the in-and-out affair, Cadman, Julie Couillard, and other instances, knowing headlines will read: "Opposition attacks, Government denies." And they know that, without bending or admitting anything, that is all that Canadians will remember.

The example that is relevant here is the Harper efforts to turn minority Parliament into the dysfunctional House of Ill Repute. With much of Harper's famous priorities carried through Parliament early in their tenure, Canadians could easily have been convinced that minority parliaments can work. We have the history to back that up, with much of the beloved Pearson's headline accomplishments coming from a minority government: universal health care, the maple leaf flag, and the Canada Pension Plan.

Taking Parliament apart

Harper was getting things done in his minority, and, many Canadians thought, was forced to hold his party's more radical influences in check. Many Canadians liked the idea of forced restraint. Minority government, Canadians might believe, was safe and efficient.

And so, Harper went about changing those psychological associations. After covering the more straightforward side of his legislative slate, Harper went to the task of taking Parliament apart. The Liberals were happy to play into his hands, and with the two sides equally up for the task, Parliament descended into the chaos and obnoxiousness of a schoolyard.

Committees devolved into circuses -- and Harper's central office provided the carnival program, newly written How-To guides for disrupting committees. All sides put their worst faces forward; venom, mud and spit flew.

But voters, the Conservatives reasoned, would blame no party more or less than any other for the mess. What they would remember was the mess.

Cynical, but effective

That is the association most Canadians have with minority government now. Outside Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, Canadians are no longer scared of a Harper majority. Many are desperate for it to rescue Parliament from its embarrassing descent into the gutter.

It's cynical, to be sure, but if we don't see the near 40 per cent support for the Conservatives drop any time soon, it will indicate that the prime minister has been successful in destroying the bogeyman of Conservative majority by displacing it with instinctive repulsion for minority rule.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

Read more: Politics

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Are You Preparing for the Next Climate Disaster?

Take this week's poll