Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.

Canada Joins 21st Century Fight against Tax Dodgers

Federal budget earmarks $90 million annually to tackle evasion. It's about time.

Dennis Howlett 24 Mar

Dennis Howlett is executive director of Canadians for Tax Fairness. He was national co-ordinator of Make Poverty History, helping to lead successful campaigns for poverty reduction plans at the provincial and federal levels.

Canada has joined the 21st century in the fight against tax dodging.

The finance minister has earmarked nearly $90 million a year to fight tax evasion -- a total of $444 million over five years. This signals the government finally got a reality check about how much it is losing to wealthy Canadians and multinational corporations who shift their money offshore to avoid paying the taxes they should be paying at home.  

The budget estimates that it will collect more than $2.6 billion in return for its investment. Just as importantly, it sends a message. Tax evasion and profit shifting is wrong, and chances are better than ever that you will be caught.

Ramping up the Canada Revenue Agency's capacity to tackle tax havens is a smart move that can pay off tenfold if handled correctly. Aside from funds earmarked for social spending, it is one of the most strategic uses of taxpayer money.

But there's a caveat.

Up to now, the CRA's record on big tax evasion cases has been abysmal. They have suffered more staff cuts than any other government department. There has been little evidence of political will or the resources to go after the big tax cheats. This despite an obvious public distaste for the anti-tax antics of Canadian multinationals and the super-wealthy.

National Revenue Minister Diane LeBouthillier needs to use that money to mobilize a sophisticated campaign to target both rich tax dodgers and the financial advisors who facilitate these covert transactions. So far, she has been playing her cards close to her chest. But the time has come for her to explain to Canadians how she will protect their interests against the unscrupulous members of the $10-million-dollar club. Some of the corporations using legal tax havens to shift their profits such as Bombardier are the guys who benefit most from government spending -- but think the little guy should pay for it.*

There are other Canadian companies that have used such measures. According to a Globe and Mail report, the Irving empire was among the first to take advantage of legal offshore tax havens.

Following the money ain't easy

LeBouthillier needs to establish units that can investigate, track and prosecute cases. The Justice Department also needs to hire more lawyers to take more big tax cheaters to court and not let them off lightly with out of court settlements because they don't have the capacity. Following the money isn't easy. But Canadians expect no less from the CRA. That was made clear by the outrage over allegations about KPMG advising wealthy clients to hide their money offshore.

To be fair, the job goes beyond the purview of the CRA. It includes the need for a good airing out at the Parliamentary Finance Committee. And both finance and global affairs ministers need to wade in. They need to complement the efforts of CRA in going after those who violate current laws, by reforming corporate tax laws to halt the use of offshore havens in ways that are now legal and supporting global efforts to curb tax havens. 

Modest estimates indicate there is $199 billion in Canadian money in offshore tax havens. That amount has grown dramatically as cuts at the CRA were implemented over the past decade. And it doesn't begin to reflect the dark side of an underground trade in hiding billions offshore -- literally laughing all the way to the Swiss bank.

Used strategically, the additional resources for the CRA will bring offshore money home and put a chill on the free-for-all that typifies the Canadian wing of the tax haven industry. There's enough there to cover off one-third of the deficit. Once the cabinet gets a whiff of that, investing in the fight against offshoring will be a no-brainer.

It's about time.

*Story corrected March 29, 2016: A reference to Irving Shipbuilding was removed.  [Tyee]

Read more: Politics

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context


The Barometer

Do You Think Trudeau Will Survive the Next Election?

Take this week's poll