Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.

Tax Evasion Convictions Plummet, But Are There Fewer Tax Cheats?

Critics say federal cutbacks have hobbled investigators.

Jeremy Nuttall 16 Apr

Jeremy J. Nuttall is The Tyee's Parliament Hill reporter in Ottawa. Find his previous stories here.

This coverage of Canadian national issues is made possible because of generous financial support from our Tyee Builders.

The number of people convicted of tax evasion in Canada has dropped by more than half since 2009, according to figures from the Canada Revenue Agency provided to The Tyee.

The figures show that over a one-year period, between 2009-10, there were 216 people found guilty of tax evasion, involving a total of $26 million.

Similarly, over a one-year period from 2013 to March 2014, there were 98 people convicted for tax evasion, involving $27 million.

Conviction figures since March 2014 are not available.

Although the number of convictions dropped dramatically, the sum total of income revenue that was not declared rose slightly.

On the face of it, the drop in convictions suggests there may be fewer tax cheats in Canada, but critics say the numbers suggest that the CRA, hobbled by budget cuts, doesn't have the resources to catch them.

"It is a reflection of the priorities of the government," said Murray Rankin, the NDP opposition critic for national revenue. "They're taking money out of the CRA, money out of enforcement and money from experts they need to get cheats and they're spending it elsewhere."

The New Democrats often question the Conservative government on their performance on tax recovery. They argue that the $250 million in cuts started in 2013 and finished by 2016, plus the loss of 2,500 full time jobs in recent years, has taken its toll.

Rankin said CRA employees have told him in confidence budget cuts at the agency are affecting its ability to weed out tax evaders. And they say the Harper government has not taken the issue seriously.

To save money, the CRA has hired younger, less experienced employees who are not as adept as the veterans at catching cheats. A report in the National Post from 2012 notes the CRA laid off 400 auditors in criminal investigation, special enforcement and voluntary disclosure divisions.

Rankin said it takes years of experience to learn how to sift through the numbered companies, offshore accounts and shelters used by many tax evaders.

He argues the cuts also make access to tax services harder for Canadians.

The figures provided to The Tyee show the 98 convictions in 2014 resulted in a total of 629 months of jail time for those convicted, compared with the 699 months of jail time for the 216 people convicted in 2010.**

Probes increasing: CRA

However, a spokesperson for the CRA said despite budget cutbacks, the resources for tax evasion investigations have not been reduced.

The CRA said the agency has been restructured. And while there are fewer investigations, those probes are more extensive. As a result, even though the number of convictions has been cut in half, the length of jail time served by convicted tax cheats has been greater.

"Since 2012 the CRA has placed a sharper focus on investigating promoters/insiders who are facilitating and encouraging non-compliance," CRA media spokeswoman Jelica Zdero said in an email. "These changes strengthen the CRA's ability to criminally prosecute those who commit tax crimes."

Zdero said that between 2009 and 2014, there were 783 convictions stemming from $150 million in evaded federal taxes.

However, the union representing Canada Revenue Agency workers said cutbacks do hamper efforts to nail tax evaders.

Debi Daviau of the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada said members have told her that budget cuts combined with department restructuring have lead to weaker enforcement and fewer experienced employees.

Meanwhile, Dennis Howlett, the executive director of Canadians for Tax Fairness, said he's seen indications that prosecutions were down, but said he didn't know they were down so much.

Cases not pursued

The organization is a non-partisan group promoting a progressive tax system to properly fund public services.

Howlett said it's not just a lack of resources in CRA headquarters; it's a lack of resources in the Department of Justice straining the government's ability to prosecute tax cheats.

He argued that, contrary to what the CRA said, cases of tax evasion that are simple are more likely to be prosecuted while complicated ones involving more money aren't pursued.

Even if larger cheats are exposed, such as some have been through leaked documents detailing secret bank records in places like Luxembourg, the offenders have a quick and easy way to avoid prosecution; they just pay the money they owe as soon as they can, Howlett said.

"It means there's no real deterrent at all," he said. "You can hide your money away and on the very small off chance someone leaks a list and they come after you, you can quickly go the voluntary disclosure route and you won't pay anything more than you would have in the first place."

In its email to The Tyee, the CRA said it received 19,000 voluntary disclosures in the 2014-15 fiscal year.

How many of those disclosures were the result of impending investigations is not known.

Still, Howlett insisted the government isn't doing enough to make sure everyone pays their fair share of taxes.

He said it's part of a plan to reduce the amount of money government has to work with in an attempt to deplete the power of the civil service.

"It's a classic right wing thing," he said. "They want to decrease the size of government."

*Story corrected April 16 at 8:50 a.m.  [Tyee]

Read more: Politics

  • Share:

Get The Tyee's Daily Catch, our free daily newsletter.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

Most Popular

Most Commented

Most Emailed


The Barometer

Are You Concerned about Your Municipality’s Water Security?

Take this week's poll