Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
Rights + Justice

Why Jesus Would Be Angry This Christmas

He'd be mad about all those charity requests as wealth inequality grows.

Bill Tieleman 18 Dec

Bill Tieleman is a regular Tyee contributor who writes a column on B.C. politics every Tuesday in 24 Hours newspaper. E-mail him at [email protected] or visit his blog.

image atom
Why does our society require that people dressed as Santa on street corners help the poor? Santa image by Shutterstock.

"Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy." -- Proverbs 31:9, the Bible 

Jesus would be angry this Christmas, furious to see charities feeding the hungry, helping the homeless, comforting those with disabilities and supporting the poor, all asking for donations. 

But Christ wouldn't be mad at those worthy groups doing good works. He would be disgusted our society refuses to properly care for those in need, making them depend on the whims of individual generosity. 

From groups running food banks to providing shelter to the homeless to assisting people with disabilities from losing their already pathetically low income to those advocating against poverty, all are desperately and perpetually short of operating funds. 

And without our financial help, real people suffer. 

Jesus would simply ask: why? 

Why in a society as developed as Canada's, in a province as full of natural resources as British Columbia, in a city as conspicuously wealthy as Vancouver, do so many live below the poverty line? 

The answer doesn't need to come from Jesus, or Buddha or Muhammad or Guru Nanak. It can easily come from us. 

The poor, the sick, and the disadvantaged suffer because we like it that way. 

No, not because we are all hard hearted sociopaths who couldn't care less about others. 

The reason is because we'd rather not pay higher taxes to redistribute wealth more equitably.

Another Christmas, wider disparities

Both the federal Conservative and B.C. Liberal governments explicitly ran campaigns promising and delivering tax "relief" to voters -- but mostly to those who are already extremely well-off. 

As a result, both Canada's and B.C.'s income inequality has grown dramatically for years.  

These governments have intentionally made it more difficult to collect employment insurance, disability benefits and social assistance. 

The effects are very clear. 

B.C. has the second worst child poverty rate in Canada after boasting the absolute worst for the previous eight years.  

Canada's 4,500 food banks have experienced the kind of phenomenal growth in "customers" that any actual private bank would celebrate wildly. 

More than 882,000 Canadians depend on food banks, an increase of 31 per cent since 2008. In B.C. over 96,000 people use food banks, a 23 per cent jump since 2008. 

But the only "reward" for food banks -- originally established as a temporary measure -- is increased dependency and lack of sufficient supplies for those they serve. 

People with disabilities in B.C. have to survive on as little as $906 a month for a single adult -- $10,877 when the Low Income Cut Off indicator for poverty is $23,637.

The gift of social progress 

No, if Jesus came back to visit us this Christmas he would be righteously angry -- and organizing for social change

So as you celebrate the season, please give money to causes that urgently ask for your help. 

But also demand that all governments do more to share the wealth our rich society creates.   

That would be a truly meaningful Christmas gift to those who need it most.  [Tyee]

Read more: Rights + Justice

  • Share:

Get The Tyee's Daily Catch, our free daily newsletter.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

Most Popular

Most Commented

Most Emailed


The Barometer

Should Fossil Fuel Ads Be Restricted?

Take this week's poll