Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.

A 2022 Agenda for Cascadia’s Climate Dreams

There are many decarbonization goals the bioregion can act on right now. Here are 25.

Peter Fairley 8 Dec 2021The Tyee / Investigate West

Peter Fairley is an award-winning journalist based in Victoria and San Francisco, whose writing has appeared in Scientific American, NewScientist, Hakai Magazine, Technology Review, the Atlantic, Nature and elsewhere.

[Editor’s note: This is a companion piece to ‘How Cascadia Can Prevent Another Lost Decade.’ Both are published as part of a year-long occasional series of articles produced by InvestigateWest in partnership with The Tyee and other news organizations exploring what it will take to shift the Cascadia region to a zero-carbon economy, and are supported in part by the Fund for Investigative Journalism. Find the whole series here.]

InvestigateWest asked several dozen activists, experts, government officials and business and labour leaders what can be done in 2022 to accelerate decarbonization in Washington, Oregon and B.C.

Answers ranged from the ultra-broad — “Get involved in climate action to send a message and combat climate anxiety” — to the hyper-specific — “End rate increases for B.C. households that buy electric cars or install heat pumps.” We selected 25 achievable and measurable actions that can help ensure that Cascadia cuts emissions in half by 2030.

Big picture

• Governments can treat climate change as a crisis by staffing up and accelerating rulemaking to implement new laws and policies ASAP, as with Washington’s speedy 18-month rollout of its carbon cap-and-trade program.

• Agencies and utilities can factor the cost of climate inaction into all regulatory and investment decisions by adding a social cost of carbon for any resulting carbon emissions. For long-term planning in B.C., they can add a higher cost: the C$170/ton fee for carbon emissions anticipated in 2030.

• Governments can acknowledge through executive orders, resolutions or new statutes that climate change threatens constitutionally protected rights to life, liberty, property and equality, thus bolstering efforts by environmental litigants to hold industries and governments accountable for carbon pollution.

• Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality can set the state’s 2030 carbon cap at 50 per cent of 1990 emissions, matching the scale and pace of reductions that climate scientists advise. Oregon’s overall goal is to cut emissions 45 per cent from 1990 levels by 2035.

• B.C.’s Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy can include emissions from all power consumption — including imports — in its 2022 greenhouse gas inventory.

• Washington’s legislature can re-pass provisions vetoed by Gov. Jay Inslee this year that would require enhanced consultation with Tribes for energy projects on their traditional territories, recognizing the disproportionate harm they continue to suffer from hydropower dams and other energy developments.

Renewable energy

• Utilities regulators can require the inclusion of cost-effective solar energy installations on flat commercial rooftops, over parking lots and along highways in utility investment plans.

• Government siting bodies and public lands agencies can fast-track evaluation of new and expanded transmission lines to tap more, high-reliability wind power from Rocky Mountain states and Alberta.

• Government leaders, utilities and regulators can help western power grid operation by pushing to complete multistate negotiations for an opt-in market for day-ahead power trading, organized by California’s transmission operator, as well as an enhanced backup power-sharing system organized by the Northwest Power Pool, a voluntary association of utilities.

• Utilities commissions can require blending of hydrogen into natural gas pipelines — as European gas utilities do — to ease delivery of zero-carbon hydrogen fuel made with renewable electricity to industries and heavy vehicles.

• Utilities commissions in Washington and Oregon can require gas distributors to cut natural gas use by increasing use of methane captured from rotting vegetation, animal waste and landfills. Capturing and burning methane slashes by 80 times the warming it can cause over the first 20 years after its release into Earth’s atmosphere. B.C. requires gas firms to deliver 15 per cent renewable fuel by 2030.


• State and provincial transportation agencies can set guidelines for spending infrastructure dollars — including billions in new U.S. federal funds — that exclude highway expansion, and legislatures can forgo earmarking highway expansion.

• City and regional governments can adopt Corvallis, Oregon’s zero-fare transit model to enhance mobility while reducing driving.

• Washington and Oregon regulators can adopt B.C.’s faster vision for zero-emissions cars, which mandates 90 per cent clean-car sales by 2030, while boosting efforts to ensure cleaner cars are affordable for all.

851px version of Interstate5Bridge.jpg
Whether and how to expand the Interstate 5 bridge between Oregon and Washington is a prime example of tough decisions facing governments of Cascadia about combating climate change. Photo by Troy Wayrynen, the Columbian.

  • Share:

Get The Tyee's Daily Catch, our free daily newsletter.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

Most Popular

Most Commented

Most Emailed


The Barometer

Are You Concerned about Your Municipality’s Water Security?

Take this week's poll