Independent
journalism that swims
against the current.
Culture
Rights + Justice

Share. Connect. Enjoy. Be an Intentional Citizen

In times of crisis, wrote the late Murray Dobbin, pushing past paralysis is our personal and collective task.

Murray Dobbin 27 Sep 2021TheTyee.ca

Murray Dobbin was an author, commentator and journalist, writing more than 200 columns for The Tyee. He died Sept. 8, 2021.

[Editor’s note: Today The Tyee honours the memory of Murray Dobbin, the eloquent advocate for progressive social change who died on Sept. 8. Dobbin wrote more than 200 columns for these pages from 2003 to 2016, including a version of the one that appears below. This article, first published at the end of 2014, “was presented and read at a recent Council of Canadians rally” to mark Dobbin’s passing, one of his colleagues wrote to let us know. Adding: “Murray’s comments and advice are as relevant today as when they were published seven years ago." Today as well we share a remembrance of Murray Dobbin by Seth Klein and Shannon Daub.]

Just what are we to do, as individuals, when faced with crises so overwhelming that our minds reel at the thought of the varied, frightening consequences?

“Oops, better not go there. Way too scary. I know! Let’s go shopping!”

The terrible irony of our situation is that just as we all need to be what I call “intentional citizens,” we are, unconsciously and even unwillingly, becoming less and less engaged, more and more individualistic.

Our collective institutions are similarly at their weakest points just as we need them to be at their strongest and most imaginative. Our democracy, including political parties, is increasingly unable to deliver what it once promised, let alone what we want.

Universities are increasingly corporatized, jettisoning traditional ethics for corporate loot to pay their bills.

Regulations developed over decades to protect us are either being eliminated or simply unenforced by governments whose job it once was to ensure our safety.

Major media, which once, nominally at least, entertained the notion of political debate about society’s direction, have been hijacked by corporatist ideology and are thus rendered incapable of seeking the truth, let alone telling it.

So, as always, it is up to us to reverse this juggernaut, to get in its way, to make clear statements through our actions as individual citizens until a time when we constitute a critical mass of citizenry that becomes a movement for social change. And it will take time. My generation will only see the start of it.

How realistic is such a notion? No one can say for certain how the coming years will unfold regarding democracy, inequality and climate change. But the notion that we can behave as if it is business as usual will not wash.

We can hardly expect our institutions — which like it or not are reflections of us — to address the moral imperative of facing the crises, if we don’t do so personally.

Soulless, savvy sellers

There are organizations out there that are actually addressing the crises, and we as citizens must support them to a much greater extent than we do now. We need to consume less and give more. (Obviously I am not talking about those who have no discretionary income.) But to consume less we need to recognize what we are up against.

The drive to consume is at the heart of a perverse capitalist system that is incapable of ever moderating its behaviour. We might want to think of the so-called corporate citizen as a psychopath, characterized, according to Wikipedia, by “enduring dissocial or antisocial behavior, a diminished capacity for empathy or remorse, and poor behavioural controls or fearless dominance.”

To make matters worse, this personality disorder is effectively codified in the law so that corporations, obligated solely to meet their fiduciary duty to shareholders, are actually encouraged to behave in this manner.

We are not just up against the most powerful institution in human history, we are also up against its particularly sophisticated — one could say maniacally designed and executed — marketing and advertising arm. We are all affected. When students in media studies classes are asked if they think advertising affects people’s behaviour, the vast majority say yes. When asked if their behaviour is affected, the vast majority say no.

Given that firms make millions by determining for their clients what 12-year-olds buy or might buy by wiring young brains to see what lights them up, what chance does any of us have in escaping the subconscious pull of marketing? You just know in your gut that we are completely out-gunned, out-smarted and easily manipulated. When it comes to advertising, we are all 12-year-olds.

Unless. Unless we actually become conscious, anti-consumer warriors, trained in the fine art of resisting every ad we ever see and vigilant in our efforts to live simply so that others may simply live.

It is not enough to “ignore” advertising. In fact, it can’t be done. They’ve already incorporated this naive and amateurish tactic into their strategy. The anti-consumer warrior treats advertising as a sinister psyop campaign launched by a mortal enemy.

And if you feel squeamish about the term enemy, then take a moment to imagine how many people will die from climate change and the rampant inequality being unleashed by consumer capitalism as you read this. Buying more and more stuff is already killing us, but it will kill a lot more of our children and their children and their children, and in ever-increasing numbers.

Sharing brings happiness

When we buy stuff we don’t need, we should see it as a declaration of active support for the forces aligned against the planet and against social justice. To actually stop buying more useless stuff requires a serious shift in consciousness: examining everything we purchase beyond food and shelter and other real necessities.

Every dollar we spend on things we don’t need is a dollar that could go to supporting the change we know we need. Obviously things are more complicated than this, and it is simply unrealistic to never buy anything we don’t need (rather than want). But the exercise itself will be instructive, and it will change the way we see the world that has been constructed for us (and not by us).

Now comes the easier part — what to do with the money you didn’t spend on more stuff. Studies show that spending on someone else actually generates more happiness than spending on yourself, because it creates social connections that would otherwise not exist in a culture that rewards possessive individualism. That would be a gratifying contribution to rebuilding community, but it also happens that spending on things that matter also brings more happiness than selfish spending.

One way of buying less stuff is to choose a percentage of your pre-tax income that you are going to deduct from your useless-stuff-budget. The Christian right effectively does this through a tithe that is set at 10 per cent with the money going to their causes (including dismantling democracy).

But let’s assume most of us reading this are still pikers when it comes to tithing, so maybe we should aim for five per cent. That’s right. If you gross $70,000 a year, then explain to yourself why you can’t find $3,500 a year to contribute to organizations that are actually making a difference in facing the global crises that threaten us. Feeling frisky? Make it 10 per cent and $7,000.

Maybe you don’t like quotas, or perhaps a tithe sounds too religious. Fine. But let us make this a year of living — and giving — consciously. Up to now, we haven’t been serious.  [Tyee]

Read more: Rights + Justice

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

What Environmental Impacts Are Most Concerning to You This Summer?

Take this week's poll