The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Canada needs more independent media. And independent media needs you.

Did you know that most news organizations in Canada are owned by just a handful of companies? And that these companies have been shutting down newsrooms and laying off reporters continually over the past few decades?

Fact-based, credible journalism is essential to our democracy. Unlike many other newsrooms across the country, The Tyee’s independent newsroom is stable and growing.

How are we able to do this? The Tyee Builder program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip into our editorial budget so that we can keep doing what we do best: fact-based, in-depth reporting on issues that matter to our readers. No paywall. No junk. Just good journalism.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to be Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
BC Election 2019 Category
Election 2019

Ten Demographic Clues to How Your Riding Might Vote Monday

Many visible minorities? Liberal. Wide open empty spaces? Conservative.

Christopher Cheung 18 Oct 2019 |

Christopher Cheung reports on urban issues for The Tyee. Follow him on Twitter at @bychrischeung or email him here.

[Editor’s note: This story is best viewed on a horizontal screen.]

Trying to guess the outcome of Monday’s elections?

Take a look at a riding’s demographics.

Vancouver data authority Andy Yan has, though he has a word of a caution.

“Demographics aren’t destiny — they’re direction,” said Yan, who is director of Simon Fraser University’s City Program. “Just because you have one particular demographic, it doesn’t necessarily guarantee it’s going to fit into the partisan stereotype.”

Demographic data don’t reflect the charisma of individual candidates, he said. And it may not capture the impact of social networks, like a church or temple, or of ridings with issues-based campaigns — like sexual education — within immigrant communities.

Still, I visited Yan’s office to have a look inside his crystal ball — or at least at Excel spreadsheets on a Dell UltraSharp Curved Ultrawide Monitor.

He combined the 2015 election results with 2016 census data to see what demographics tells us about voters.

“It is interesting to see cases where characteristics have descriptive power,” Yan said.

Yan handed me the dataset from the last election, and here are 10 lessons I pulled out.

Ridings with dense populations were far more likely to vote “progressive” (or at least not Conservative).

The 25 per cent of ridings with the densest populations range from Brossard—Saint-Lambert on Montreal’s South Shore with 2,037 people per square kilometre to Toronto Centre, with 17,785 people per square kilometre. (Skeena-Bulkley Valley in B.C.’s northwest had less than one person per square kilometre.)

Of the 85 ridings, 67 elected a Liberal MP and 11 an NDP candidate — 92 per cent were won by a progressive candidate.

All ridings, their population densities and how they voted. Hover over points for more information. All visualizations by Christopher Cheung. All data from the 2016 census and 2015 general election results, courtesy of Andy Yan.

Liberals won in higher-density ridings.

The median density for the 184 ridings won by the Liberals was 1,217 people per square kilometre.

The median density in the 44 ridings won by the NDP was 543 people per square kilometre.

For Conservatives, the median density in the 99 ridings they won was 36 people per square kilometre, reflecting their support in rural areas.

So if you’re called for a riding prediction, check population density before you make a decision.

If your riding has a majority of visible minorities, there’s an 85-per-cent chance it elected a Liberal.

Let’s look at ridings that are “majority minority.” That is, ridings whose populations are more than half non-white, or what the census calls “visible minorities.”

There are 40 of these ridings, from New Westminster—Burnaby at 51 per cent non-white to Scarborough North at 92 per cent.

The Liberals won 34 of them, and the NDP and Conservatives won three each.

All 40 ‘majority-minority’ ridings and how they voted.

Canada’s only two majority-Chinese ridings voted Conservative.

They are Markham—Unionville, with 64 per cent of its population identifying as Chinese, and Richmond Centre, at 59 per cent. (Conservatives are likely to retain both seats Monday, according to projections from 338Canada.)

Ridings that were more than one-fifth South Asian all voted Liberal.

There are 23 of these ridings. It was a decisive win for the Liberals, perhaps in part because two-thirds of their candidates in those ridings were of various South Asian backgrounds.

South Asians are Canada’s largest minority group at 1.9 million people, 5.5 per cent of the population, according to the 2016 census.

The ridings with the largest percentage of people who identify as South Asian. All 23 of them voted Liberal. Two-thirds of victorious Liberal candidates are of various South Asian backgrounds.

The Liberals won 84 per cent of majority-immigrant ridings.

There are 31 ridings with more people born outside Canada than in Canada. The Liberals won 26 of them.

All ridings with more immigrants than Canadian-borns and how they voted.

Rich ridings like the Liberals and Conservatives equally.

The richest quarter of ridings in Canada have median household incomes between $82,443 (Peace River—Westlock) and $155,906 (in Fort McMurray—Cold Lake).

The Liberals and Conservatives won 41 each out of the 85 ridings. The NDP won just two and the Bloc Québécois took one.

The richest quartile of all Canadian ridings and how they voted.

Ridings with lots of renters didn’t vote Conservative.

There was no clear homeowners’ party, but it’s clear that ridings where more than 50 per cent of households were renters did not like the Conservatives.

Of the 43 majority-renter ridings, 33 voted Liberal, nine voted NDP and only one (Beauport—Limoilou) voted Conservative.

All ridings where renters outnumber homeowners and how they voted.

Ridings with the most unaffordable homes (relative to incomes) looked to the Liberals for a fix.

In ridings where home prices were most out of whack with household incomes, who did residents vote for?

Yan looked at the median home price in each riding and divided it by the median household income to find the home-price-to-income ratio, a common measure of unaffordability.

(Renters aren’t directly accounted for in this measure, but areas where homes are expensive to purchase tend to be expensive to rent.)

Looking at the top quarter of ridings where this ratio is the greatest, the Liberals came out on top. Of these 85 ridings, the Liberals won 65, the NDP won 12, the Conservatives won six and the Greens won one.

Voters — both renters and homeowners — could’ve been attracted to the Liberals’ ambitious housing promises in 2015 to invest in rental housing, co-op housing and low-income housing, as well as to help homebuyers.

The top quarter of ridings with the greatest home-price-to-income-ratio (medians of both were used) and how they voted.

Ridings with higher education mostly voted progressive.

Let’s look at Canada’s most educated ridings, with between 31 per cent with higher education (Fredericton) and 62 per cent (Spadina—Fort York).

Of those 85 ridings, 63 elected a Liberal, seven a New Democrat and one voted a Green. That means 84 per cent of Canada’s most educated ridings elected MPs from parties that leaned toward the progressive end of the political spectrum.

If we look at all of Canada, the median percentage of people with higher education is 15 per cent in Conservative ridings, 19 per cent in NDP ridings, and 24 per cent in Liberal ridings.

The quartile of Canadian ridings with the highest percentage of people with higher education, and how they voted.

Again, as Yan warns, demographics aren’t destiny, they’re direction.

But this kind of data is useful for political organizers.

“They’ll know where to concentrate their efforts,” said Yan. “They’ll know where their outliers are, where their strongholds are. They might inherently know this through their own political instincts, but this provides a view into the demographic characteristics behind those voters.”

At the very least, said Yan, “it’s food for the pundits.”  [Tyee]

Read more: Election 2019

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities


  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other


The Barometer

Are You Concerned about Rising Support for Canada’s Far-Right Parties?

Take this week's poll