The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Want to Know More about Dementia? Start Here

‘The End of Memory’ is a solid, clear introduction to a complex condition.

By Crawford Kilian 16 Jan 2019 |

Tyee contributing editor Crawford Kilian, as part of this project, blogs at The Politics of Dementia.

[Editor’s note: In December, Tyee contributing editor Crawford Kilian announced he’d spend 2019 exploring the public health issue of dementia from every angle, and asked readers to help by sharing insights, experiences, research and resources. This is the first in his occasional series.]

In 1900 a young Vienna doctor, Alois Alzheimer, met a woman in her 50s named Auguste Deter. She seemed to have lost much of her memory, and Alzheimer followed her case until she died in 1905. Then he autopsied her and made slides of slices of her brain tissue.

This was the first major breakthrough in a scientific quest not yet completed. Alzheimer found Deter’s brain cells laced with microscopic “plaques” and “tangles,” proteins that seemed to interfere with proper brain function. Miraculously, his slides survived and were rediscovered decades later, when they could be examined with more advanced techniques.

Even so, it wasn’t until the 1970s and ‘80s that “Alzheimer’s” was understood to be the major factor in dementias. That slowness reflects our cultural reluctance to recognize a disease even when we’re suffering from it.

Jay Ingram reveals this and much more in The End of Memory, his excellent, wide-ranging introduction to a complex subject. Ingram is a skilled science writer (he used to be host of CBC Radio’s Quirks & Quarks), and he can deal with complex technical issues in clear English. Here he gives us the history of dementia, what science has learned and the present state of the battle against it. And it is a battle, though we still have only an uncertain sense of the enemy.

Ingram tells us that dementia was understood even in ancient times, but because so few people lived to old age, it was assumed to be a routine consequence of long life. By the 18th century, Europeans who survived infancy had a better chance of living to 70, and therefore of experiencing dementia.

Around that time, Jonathan Swift, the great Irish satirist and essayist, brought a race of immortals into his Gulliver’s Travels: the Struldbruggs didn’t die, but they kept aging. Swift himself was likely in the early stages of dementia when he wrote about them. In 1745 he died, almost 80, after several years of increasing mental incapacity. He displayed some classical symptoms: he suffered a stroke, became quarrelsome with old friends and stopped speaking.

The brains of hundreds of nuns

The more we learn about dementia, the more confusing its causes can seem. Ingram discusses the Nun Study, in which 678 Catholic nuns agreed to be studied and to have their brains dissected after they died.

The study’s findings were baffling. Sister Mary, the first to be autopsied, had been of literally sound mind right up until her death at age 101 in 1993. But her brain cells were as riddled with plaques and tangles as Auguste Deter’s had been. Other nuns had been diagnosed with dementia but their brains were free of plaques and tangles.

Even stranger, each nun had written an essay as a young woman before taking orders — and those essays accurately predicted who would die with dementia and who would not. Essays with high “idea density” — complex sentences with multiple clauses and modifiers — were written by women who would not experience dementia. The nuns who died with dementia had written in simple sentences, with low idea density.

This seems to support the well-known finding that well-educated people experience Alzheimer’s and other dementias far less than poorly educated people. But it’s not that simple: Sister Mary was not very well educated. And Iris Murdoch, a famously cerebral English novelist, lived with undiagnosed Alzheimer’s for over 20 years before her last novel’s poverty of vocabulary exposed her condition.

Ingram doesn’t pretend to understand these contradictions, but he offers some theories. “Brain reserve” is one: “a mysterious something that protects some individuals from dementia.” Education may boost brain reserve, enabling the well-schooled to fight off the attacks of plaques and tangles. (But Sister Mary! And Iris Murdoch!)

We also learn that some of our genes may control both early and late Alzheimer’s. Our eating habits, our weight and our physical activity all seem to influence our chances. People with Type 2 diabetes have double the risk of getting Alzheimer’s, and some scientists, Ingram says, “have made a powerful case — a revolutionary case — for thinking of Alzheimer’s as Type 3 diabetes.

More answers, more questions

Still, there remains much debate and many open questions in fields tackling dementia. Can we prevent or invite dementia by our lifestyle choices like food and exercise? Maybe. Are dementia rates actually falling? Maybe — or else people with dementia are just living longer. Does high IQ protect against dementia? Maybe — but maybe against only some kinds of dementia. India has low rates of dementia; could it be thanks to consuming lots of turmeric, or do Indians just expect old people to have dementia?

As soon as research seems to find a culprit (like aluminum cooking utensils), further research exonerates the culprit. Even in 2019, five years after Ingram published his book, experts are quarrelling about what the hell defines Alzheimer’s disease, as opposed to “Alzheimer’s clinical syndrome” and other forms of dementia.

Ingram doesn’t try to reduce a complex condition to simple ideas. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with dementia, this book offers no false encouragement. But you will know what you are getting into, and you’ll know that a lot of people and organizations are doing their best to help.

And if you read this book to understand a growing public health problem, you will be better prepared to create the political pressure needed to push dementia care and research far beyond their present uncertainty.

This series is made possible by a grant from Bruce and Gail Macdonald.  [Tyee]

Read more: Health

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities


  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll