The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Taking on the Public Health Issue of Dementia

One out of 15 Canadians over 65 live with it. Help The Tyee demystify it.

By Crawford Kilian 11 Dec 2018 |

Tyee contributing editor Crawford Kilian, 77, blogs about The Politics of Dementia.

We used to call it “second childhood,” and then “senility.” When most people died in their mid-60s, as they did in the mid-20th century, younger people shrugged it off as a minor concern.

Now we call it dementia, and when average Canadians live into their late 70s and early 80s, we still shrug it off — not because it doesn’t matter, but because it scares the daylights out of us.

Dementia isn’t precisely a disease. It’s a term for failing memory, fading cognition, a brain no longer up to basic daily tasks. Alzheimer’s, which is a disease, is the diagnosis given to more than three out of every five people with dementia symptoms.

The Canadian government says over 400,000 of us over age 65 live with dementia — 6.7 per cent of the 5.9 million Canadians of that age. Millions of us are personally affected by, and related to, persons with dementia. Worldwide, dementia cases have more than doubled, from 20 million in 1990, to 43 million in 2016.

Those numbers should make it a major public health crisis, and therefore a major political issue. The government says it’s spent $193 million since 2013 on research, and over 350 scientists are at work on the problem through the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging.

That’s welcome news, but clearly not enough to deal with a problem likely to double by 2031. Instead, we leave the issue to a few advocacy groups like the Alzheimer Society, and hope we personally won’t need their support.

However good such groups may be, more — much more — clearly is needed. The Canadian Association for Retired Persons estimates over eight million of us provide informal care to friends or family members — most of them likely persons with dementia. When we call these people caregivers, let’s distinguish them from paid caregivers in our health and social welfare system. They are volunteers.

Over a million such caregivers are 65 or older, and almost half of caregivers between 45 and 64 are caring for both a parent and children.

Secret support saving the system up to $31 billion

According to CARP, “The economic value of caregivers is astounding. Caregivers who look after seniors save Canada’s healthcare system between $24 to $31 billion annually.” Put another way, non-paid caregivers are spending that much to look after their loved ones.

If Ottawa is paying only about $40 million a year on research, it’s barely paying attention. The government spends so little because it’s terrified of spending more.

It’s all Canadians can do in the present economic order to keep our families fed and housed and educated, while running up huge personal debt. If dementia were considered a social issue, we’d all have to pay for it. Politicians would have to impose the taxes to do real scientific research, train more professional caregivers, and create a host of costly programs and resources to ease the burden on family caregivers.

Worse yet, the research might find that we’ve put ourselves on the dementia track by what we eat, the exercise we don’t do, and the ways we make our living. You don’t get re-elected by telling your voters they’re killing themselves, whether by what they put in their cars or what they put in their bodies.

The issue is social and shared

So we’re mistakenly treating dementia as a personal problem, especially for the spouse or child giving care to the person with dementia. If you Google “books on dementia,” you’ll see most are about the plight of the caregiver, not the patient. Most of the books on caregiving are feel-good pep talks on “creating moments of joy” and how to get through the bad days. Those with dementia get colouring books and books with photos from the 1950s.

And if you create a Google Alert for “dementia,” your mailbox will soon fill up with stories on saving yourself. This just in as I write: a small daily glass of orange juice will cut your chances of developing dementia by 50 per cent (if you’re a middle-aged man).

This is not a breakthrough, just another “new hope for the dead” story the media love to run. If you click through to read it, you’ll also run into an ad for the “five best herbs for dementia.” Public anxiety about a real threat has created a market for private snake-oil salvation.

The antidote to such anxiety is to share solid information, as well as support, in ways that pull out of isolation each lonely member of the vast, hidden “dementia nation.”

Help in this group project

To that end, The Tyee has asked me to write a series of articles on dementia in the new year, and so today I am inviting readers to help by sharing angles, expert voices, and insights hard won through experience. Send emails to info (at) thetyee (dot) ca with “dementia” in the subject line.

In the meantime, I aim to try and identify the most promising research and the best practices for dealing with this complex and growing problem: what do we know about the brain?

What do we know about lifestyle factors that affect our chances of dementia?

How tightly woven is the social safety net for dementia cases and their caregivers, and how might we improve it?

And since caregivers and dementia cases themselves have become experts in this subject, who among them are writing most clearly and usefully on their experiences, and how can we learn from them?

The great 19th century German physician and politician, Dr. Rudolf Virchow, famously observed, “Medicine is a social science, and politics is nothing else but medicine on a large scale.” Dementia is a public health issue, and politics must address it on a very large scale indeed.  [Tyee]

Read more: Health

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities


  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll