The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Canada needs more independent media. And independent media needs you.

Did you know that most news organizations in Canada are owned by just a handful of companies? And that these companies have been shutting down newsrooms and laying off reporters continually over the past few decades?

Fact-based, credible journalism is essential to our democracy. Unlike many other newsrooms across the country, The Tyee’s independent newsroom is stable and growing.

How are we able to do this? The Tyee Builder program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip into our editorial budget so that we can keep doing what we do best: fact-based, in-depth reporting on issues that matter to our readers. No paywall. No junk. Just good journalism.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to be Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Opinion
  |  
Federal Politics
  |  
Election 2021

Who’s Still Promising Electoral Reform? Fair Voting BC Takes a Look

The Liberals promised change in 2015 and didn’t deliver. Here is who’s keeping the issue alive this time.

Antony Hodgson 10 Sep 2021 | TheTyee.ca

Antony Hodgson is president of Fair Voting BC and a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of British Columbia.

Politicians from all parties like to talk about the importance of ensuring all voters are entitled to equal influence on the makeup of Parliament and the need for changes in our voting system to make this goal a reality.

But they have not taken action once they come to power under our current first-past-the-post system, which allows parties to win near absolute power despite winning the support of barely one-third of voters.

As we enter the last days of this election campaign, Fair Voting BC has completed our analysis of the federal parties’ positions on electoral reform.

Of the parties that are running candidates in a majority of ridings in B.C., only the Green party and the NDP have put forward positions and policy commitments that would be acceptable to democratic reform advocates.

Although there are some differences between the positions of these two parties, Fair Voting BC can comfortably endorse both of them.

In contrast, the other parties, the Liberals, Conservatives and People’s Party, are essentially missing in action on this file and have made no meaningful commitments.

Top choice: Green Party of Canada

Overall, Fair Voting BC considers the Greens to have the strongest position on voting reform of all the parties. On their website page entitled “Demand Democratic Reform,” they say that “Canada’s first-past-the-post electoral system must go,” and “demand proportional representation because Canadians want a fair electoral system.”

In their platform, the Greens call for a National Citizens’ Assembly to consider how to modernize our voting system, as well as several other proposed reforms such as lowering the voting age and mandatory and online voting.

In addition, they propose related reforms such as restoring the per-vote subsidy for parties and implementing “truth in advertising” rules for political advertising, as well as various initiatives related to integrity, ethics and transparency.

Our only small concern is that they do not explicitly state a commitment to implement any recommendation from the citizens’ assembly without a referendum. (We consider a referendum to be not only unnecessary, but ill-advised, as we believe that voters have a right to be represented in Parliament by an MP of their own choosing and that this right should not be denied to them based on a referendum.)

Unfortunately, the Green party is not running candidates in all ridings, so not all voters will have an opportunity to vote for a Green candidate.

VoterReformReportCardChart.jpg
Brackets mean Fair Voting BC has some concerns about the party’s position. Green boxes indicate positive positions, yellow boxes indicate positions which concern us to some extent and red boxes indicate positions of significant concern.

Second place: New Democratic Party

The NDP also has a strong position on voting reform. Its platform says “A New Democrat government will bring in mixed-member proportional representation that works for Canada — and we will do it in our first mandate in government.”

“We’ll establish an independent citizen’s assembly to recommend the best way to put it in place for the next election to ensure both local representation and a federal government that reflects the voters’ choice of parties,” the NDP says. “Once Canadians have the opportunity to experience the new voting system and compare it to the old one, we will hold a referendum to confirm the choice.”

Mixed-member proportional representation, used in New Zealand, Germany, Scotland and other jurisdictions, allows voters to cast ballots for both local representatives and the party they believe has the best policies. The outcome is a Parliament that more closely reflects the popular vote.

In addition, the NDP proposes several other reforms, including lowering the voting age and banning cash-for-access fundraising events.

Our main concern with the NDP’s platform is that they have already decided they wish to implement a mixed-member model and want a National Citizens’ Assembly to focus more on how to put it in place rather than considering whether this model is the best choice for Canada in the first place. (Though NDP MP Daniel Blaikie did take the lead in introducing and passing a motion in the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs calling for a study on establishing a National Citizens’ Assembly to investigate electoral reforms without specifying any limitations on what reforms would be considered.)

We are also concerned that the NDP is willing to endorse a referendum following introduction of a reformed voting system, as we do not believe that voters’ right to representation should be able to be removed by a referendum.

Not endorsed: Liberal, Conservative and People’s Party

None of the other three parties analyzed have anything meaningful to say about voting reform. They are essentially ignoring the issue in their platforms.

The Liberals, of course, famously promised that 2015 would be the last election run under the first-past-the-post voting system, only to renege on that promise. The only small point we can make in the Liberals’ favour is that their members on the procedure and house affairs committee did endorse Blaikie’s motion to study establishing a National Citizens’ Assembly, which we believe is critical to re-establishing public dialogue about voting reform. The Conservative members of the committee voted against supporting the proposed study of a National Citizens’ Assembly.

We hope voters find this analysis helpful as they consider how to cast their ballots and encourage them to fully research the positions of all candidates running in their own ridings.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

What Issue Is Most Important to You This Election?

Take this week's poll