Ask Every Politician When They Committed to Fixing the Housing Crisis

It’s not like they have any excuse for not knowing 10 years ago. Proof here.

By David Beers 13 Sep 2018 | TheTyee.ca

David Beers is founding editor of The Tyee.

A new report is making headlines by sounding an alarm about the vast gap between what people earn and what housing costs in the Vancouver region. As The Vancouver Sun summed up Zoocasa’s findings: “There isn’t a single market across Metro Vancouver where a household earning the median income can afford houses for sale. Eleven of the 21 markets studied had income gaps of more than $100,000.”

The report is well researched with neat infographics – but can’t be said to be in any way surprising to policymakers in the region. The income-housing cost gap was already brutal – and predicted to widen dramatically without government intervention – when The Tyee, nearly a decade ago, rolled out its in-depth, 12-part series “A Home for All”.

It’s not like lead reporter Monte Paulsen obscured the problem, or the stakes. Here are the first paragraphs of his opening article in the series:

Ordinary families can no longer afford to buy or rent ordinary homes in British Columbia.

Vancouver is the fourth most expensive place in the world in which to buy a house, according to a recent study by the Winnipeg-based Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

Victoria, Kelowna and Abbotsford also rank among the world’s 25 least-affordable housing markets, according to the survey of 265 markets in Australia, Canada, the U.K. and the U.S.

As a result, a two-paycheque family earning a median income can no longer hope to qualify for a mortgage large enough to buy even an entry-level home in Metro Vancouver.

And a single-parent family cannot affordably rent a two-bedroom apartment.

Who is the firm behind the report now being trumpeted by the Sun and other media? Zoocasa started out as an online search tool for real estate listings and now boasts of being “a full service, in-house real estate team supported by modern technology and marketing.” In other words, it’s in the business of selling properties, and its report implies that even realtors are worried that the golden goose is ailing – local incomes are too weak to fuel sales ongoing.

But (not to be repetitive) the real estate industry, and anyone in government who wanted to head off this crisis, has known this fundamental sickness threatening the social fabric of the region. All they had to do was Google, among other sources, the site you are reading now.

To read the entire series The Tyee published in 2009 (which, by the way, was a Webster Award finalist) click here.

While we’re at it, here’s the rest of Paulsen’s kick-off piece, published Feb. 10, 2009.

… This article measures the gap between what ordinary British Columbians can afford, and what ordinary homes cost in this province.

Half a home: What first-time buyers can afford

Ordinary families earn $64,332 a year. That’s the median income among all “census families” in the Vancouver metropolitan area, according 2005 census data provided by Statistics Canada. Province-wide family income is a wee bit lower at $62,346.

An ordinary bank will loan that household enough money to buy a $258,142 home, with monthly payments of $1,466. This mortgage calculation assumes a typical down payment of $12,907, a 5 per cent interest rate, annual taxes of $1,200, utilities and strata fees of $200 a month, and payments toward other credit of $200 a month. Fiddle with those assumptions, and the amount of money available to a median family with ordinary credit could rise or fall. (With a down payment of $27,449, for example, a median family could afford a $274,487 home.)

An ordinary home costs $484,211 in Metro Vancouver. That’s the residential benchmark price of all homes sold in December 2008, as calculated by the MLSLink Housing Price Index. That figure averages condos, attached homes and detached homes throughout the region; apartment properties averaged $333,275 in December, while detached homes averaged $648,418. (Obviously, home prices vary across B.C., with places such as Whistler costing more, and many northern communities costing less.)

So, the gap between what an ordinary family can afford and what an ordinary home costs in Metro Vancouver is about $226,069.

Half a home is all that most Vancouver-area families can afford.

Single parents: Sleeping on the sofa

Single-parent families have it worse.

About 15 per cent of Vancouver-area families are headed by single parents. Four out of five of those are women.

The median after-tax income for a single parent family headed by a woman was $34,350 a year. That translates to take-home pay of $2,862 a month.

Buying a home is out of the question for these families. Most aspire simply to an apartment in which children have their own bedrooms.

Financial advisors suggest that no household should spend more than 30 per cent of its income on housing. (It’s called shelter-to-income ratio, or “STIR.”)

For a female single parent in the Vancouver region, that 30 per cent works out to $859 a month.

One-bedroom apartments rent for an average of $880 a month in Metro Vancouver, according to October 2008 data from the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC).

Two-bedroom apartments fetch $1,124 a month.

As a result, 42.7 per cent of British Columbian renters spend more than the 30 per cent shelter-to-income threshold, according to CMHC figures.

Kelowna is the least affordable rental market in Canada, with 47.9 per cent of renters paying more than the threshold. In Vancouver, 43.8 per cent spend over the limit; in Abbotsford, 43.2 per cent do so.

As a result, many single parents are sleeping on the sofa.

The best solution: Boost family income by 85 per cent

There are two ways to narrow B.C.’s housing gap: Either raise incomes, or lower the cost of housing.

Social policy experts claim raising incomes is the better option. They note that B.C. households bring home lower median incomes than Canadians as a whole. They warn that as the income-to-housing-cost gap expands, hundreds of thousands of British Columbians fall within a few missed paycheques of becoming homeless.

Economists also believe that raising incomes is the better option. They note that renters who spend 42 per cent of their income on housing are a drag on the economy because they have that much less to spend on cars, clothes, furniture and other goods that stimulate the economy.

“We argue that the ultimate solution to the affordable housing problem is to raise market incomes and develop a more effective and equitable income transfer regime to help lower-income households,” wrote TD Economics chief economist Don Drummond in a 2003 paper on affordable housing.

How much would family incomes have to rise in order for an ordinary family to purchase an ordinary home?

About 85 per cent.

Median family income would have to almost double in order for an ordinary family to afford an ordinary home in Metro Vancouver.

A family would need an income of $118,930 a year in order to purchase a residence costing $484,211, assuming 5 per cent down and all the same mortgage terms described above (except for higher taxes on the more expensive property).

Unfortunately, as the TD Economics team observed, ordinary incomes are not rising in this country.

“Over the past decade, income disparities have widened, due to both the changing structure of the Canadian economy -- which has favored highly-skilled professional occupations -- and reductions in federal and provincial support under social assistance programs,” the TD paper noted.

Other ways to whittle down the gap

The other way to close the gap would be to lower the cost of housing.

While there is no one solution that will close the $200,000 canyon between what British Columbians earn and the homes they seek, there are more than a dozen strategies that could each help close the gap by tens of thousands of dollars. All are already working elsewhere.

So that’s what The Tyee published in 2009. The following 11 stories delivered, as promised, strategies for reversing runaway housing costs.

Fixing the housing crisis, then and now, demands action by all levels of government – federal, provincial and municipal. At the moment in B.C. we are in the throes of municipal elections. A reasonable question for every local candidate would be: Were you early or late to the task at hand?  [Tyee]

Read more: Housing

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Get The Tyee in your inbox

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities


  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other


The Barometer

Has Canada been infected with the Trumpian sickness?

Take this week's poll