The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Putin, Obama, Harper and Fears of a New Domino Effect

How a chance was missed to halt the rise of a new Russian empire.

By André Gerolymatos 5 Aug 2014 |

André Gerolymatos is director of the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Centre for Hellenic Studies at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver. This piece was published with support from readers who have pledged contributions as Tyee Builders.

What are Vladimir Putin's larger aims in the Ukraine and what can U.S. President Obama and other leaders in the West, including Stephen Harper, do to thwart them? Are we on the brink of a new Cold War as some have argued?

Recall that the Cold War was waged for decades on the premise in the West that the Soviet Union was determined to maintain and expand an empire knitted together by ideology and military might. U.S. leaders justified military interventions in Korea, Vietnam and elsewhere as necessary to "contain" Soviet attempts to undermine and topple democratic governments like so many global "dominoes."

Today, we do see a Russian leader fuelled by dreams of empire and obsessed by a 21st century domino theory. But this time the game is altered in crucial ways that place Obama, Harper and their allies in very different, difficult predicament -- one that could have been avoided.

Rise and fall of the last Russian empire

The collapse of the Soviet Union brought about the end of communism as a major force, and also ended the second Russian Empire. The Russian tsars, beginning with Peter the Great, attempted to extend Russia's frontiers from the Baltic, to the Pacific, and to the Black. Under the great tsars, much of Central Asia, the Baltic states, Belorussia, the Ukraine, the Caucasus, and the southern coast of the Black Sea fell under the sway of Russia. Ultimately, the empire receded, weighed down by corruption and an inability to adjust to the political and economic forces of the twentieth century, finally collapsing in 1917.

The period of transformation from tsarist Russia into the Soviet Union was momentary, and under Joseph Stalin, a new Russian empire was reconstituted under the guise of Soviet socialism. After initially granting the former non-Russian territories the status of republics, Moscow's rule was quickly imposed with an absolutism that would have made Ivan the Terrible blush. The Soviet leaders faced the same geopolitical challenges that geography had imposed on tsarist Russia and dutifully they proceeded to secure the same regions that had fallen to the Russian tsars.

The Russian and subsequent Soviet empire faced the same challenge of overcoming the fear of invasion -- the Russians had suffered under Mongol and Ottoman occupation -- made vulnerable by the country's exposed eastern and western flanks. Russian leaders have historically claimed that enemies and rivals have hemmed in the country. In 1941, the German invasion re-awakened Russian paranoia and Stalin's post Second World War ambitions, partially whetted by a desire for more territory, came from a need to safeguard Russia from another invasion.

During the Soviet era, Moscow's leadership also feared the domino effect if one of its satellites broke away, and even if remaining a communist state, would encourage others to follow suit. Some pundits are arguing that Vladimir Putin is in the process of recreating a Russian Empire, but an empire based on corruption more akin to the later Soviet period than that of the tsars. They argue that in this context, Putin is afraid of another kind of domino effect. Most of the former Soviet satellites are ruled by authoritarian regimes that thrive on corruption. Consequently, if the Ukraine, a country that was governed by a kleptocracy, broke away, it could have inspired similar mass opposition to Putin and his cronies. The theory is that Putin is buying good will with the Russian people by feeding them visions of empire and past glories while solidifying his grip over the country.

Why Putin is obsessed with Ukraine

No doubt many middle aged Russians have nostalgic memories of Soviet greatness and harbour resentment at the demise of past greatness at the hands of capitalist America. They certainly revel that Putin has restored the Crimea back to Russia and applaud the Russian leader's attempts to restore Russia as a world-class power. The question that the West faces is whether, for Putin's ambitions, the Crimea is enough. Putin can argue that the Crimean Peninsula had always been part of Russia and when Khrushchev gave it to the Ukraine, that country was part of the Soviet Empire. The Russians in eastern Ukraine are now agitating for union with Russia and it is not certain if these are the legitimate wishes of the population or if they are being organized by Moscow. It is even possible that Russian Special Forces are helping the demonstrators seize buildings and police stations. Certainly Putin has a unique interpretation of the Russian-Ukraine relationship.

For example, the president of the Russian gas company Gazprom, Alexei Miller, confirmed Saturday that the Ukraine must pay Russia 11.4 billion dollars, which corresponds to the reduction in the price of gas which was given to the country for the last four years. The lower price was part of the Kharkov Agreement, signed in April 2010 (and to last until 2042), which permitted the Russian fleet to use the Black Sea base of Sevastopol in the Crimea. The agreement was annulled this week, Mr. Miller said in an interview with Russian state media, since the Crimea is now part of Russia and therefore the Ukraine must repay the previous reduction.

In effect, Putin is trying to destroy what is left of the Ukraine economy by making it easier for Ukrainian Russians to seek union with Russia, under the fear of poverty, eventually forcing the Ukraine to reestablish its client relationship with Moscow.

Obama's mess, Harper's dilemma

Under these circumstances, Washington is faced with a serious problem that will impact to what degree non-aligned (countries not part of NATO or the EU) will be able to trust the U.S. The dilemma facing the Obama Administration is that if it pours millions into the Ukraine the money will simply enrich Russia, as Kiev will have no choice but to pay its debts to Moscow. A military option is not possible, so it will be a matter of financial aid and sanctions against the Russians. Extensive sanctions will hurt the EU countries and the world economy, which leaves Washington with two options: pump massive financial aid to the Ukraine or simply leave the country to return back to the Russian sphere.

Here in Canada, Prime Minister Steven Harper faces his own wrenching dilemma. He was prepared to condemn Putin's move against Ukraine and takeover of the Crimean peninsula for the sake of Ukrainian-Canadian voters, and went so far as to say Putin's Russia should be punished with expulsion from the G8. But the other challenge is Canada's North. As long as Russia is part of the international community through organizations such as the G8, Putin was less inclined to look for adventures outside of Eastern Europe, for example in the North Pole region.

Given the high stakes and constricting options, it would be fascinating to be able to listen in on conversations Barack Obama may be having with Stephen Harper and other western leaders at the moment. If the Obama White House had handled the Crimean crisis with more subtlety, it could have avoided a greater crisis. If the U.S. had agreed to a referendum for the Crimea, albeit one under UN auspices, it would have given the people of the peninsula a free choice and forced Putin to abide by whatever the outcome. In that case the Crimea would have either freely joined or rejected to become part of Russia. Putin would not have been demonized and forced to accept the rule of law.

As it stands, Vladimir Putin has nothing to lose and everything to gain by continuing his aggression against the Ukraine. And the U.S. will be left holding the bill.  [Tyee]

Read more: Politics,

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll