The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Canada needs more independent media. And independent media needs you.

Did you know that most news organizations in Canada are owned by just a handful of companies? And that these companies have been shutting down newsrooms and laying off reporters continually over the past few decades?

Fact-based, credible journalism is essential to our democracy. Unlike many other newsrooms across the country, The Tyee’s independent newsroom is stable and growing.

How are we able to do this? The Tyee Builder program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip into our editorial budget so that we can keep doing what we do best: fact-based, in-depth reporting on issues that matter to our readers. No paywall. No junk. Just good journalism.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to be Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Opinion

Idea #4: Let's Make It a Hypergreen World

Drastic times call for drastic measures. It's time to go hypergreen.

By Crawford Kilian 24 Dec 2009 | TheTyee.ca

Crawford Kilian is a contributing editor of The Tyee.

image atom

[Editor's Note: For your consideration, we'd like to present the 2010 edition of New Ideas for the New Year. This popular annual series highlights creative ideas for improving our lives and communities. We'll publish a new one starting today until Jan. 1.]

So we've built our compost bins. We put out our blue boxes and take our own shopping bags to the store. We wish everyone did, and we dream of the day when Canada is a truly environmentalist country, fighting global warming at any cost.

But let's admit it: We need to stop paying lip service to so-called green policies and go all the way to hypergreen.

Cars kill

Car pooling is all well and good, but a hypergreen Canada would get rid of the private automobile altogether. When used properly, cars warm the air, pollute the water, and poison the soil. Used recklessly, they kill 1.2 million people a year worldwide and cause almost 50 million disabling injuries. In Canada alone they kill about 3,000 a year and injure a quarter-million of us. Public transit can run on solar or wind power, and we can reserve a few automobiles for emergency service like ambulances.

So we'd live within walking or biking distance of work and shopping. Employers might even have to provide housing within a block or two of employees' workplace.

Every hypergreen holiday would be a staycation. The closest we'd get to Cancun or the Greek islands would be webcam shots. After all, aircraft and cruise ships pump CO2 into the atmosphere, and many onetime holiday destinations will be short of water soon anyway. Or under water altogether.

The 100-mile diet would be policy, not a lifestyle choice. Forget imported California food and French wine. Growing them in exportable quantities would damage the exporters' ecosystems. Transporting them would use up expensive fossil fuel while aggravating global warming. We'd eat local produce and drink wine from vineyards in Langley (which will likely have an Okanagan climate in a few years).

We might keep chickens or even a cow in our back yard, unless bird flu and cattle farts make vegetarianism mandatory. We'd pay by the litre for our water. Heating and electricity would also have the value of scarcity. To keep warm, we'd probably knit our own sweaters from local wool (or dog fur, assuming we can afford pets).

At least we couldn't blame our problems on immigration. A hypergreen society wouldn't have immigrants, even if they were dying of drought and famine in their homelands, because newcomers would only put more demands on our finite resources. By the same token, we couldn't emigrate; who wants another mouth to feed? So we'd probably stay in one place for good. (With fewer young workers, seniors could expect paid work as long as they wanted it.)

Economic boom = ecological bust

In a hypergreen Canada, no one would get very rich. Economic growth would be a contradiction in terms. An industrial boom would be a disastrous assault on our ecosystem. Why produce a surplus if we can't use it ourselves and we can't export it? And if we could export it, what would we buy with the money we made?

The Conservatives, with a straight face, talk about "balancing environmental protection and economic prosperity." But a protected environment offers nothing we would define as prosperity -- and prosperity always depends on an unsustainable ransacking of the environment. Hypergreen Canada would be literally conservative: "Use it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without."

As Kermit the Frog famously observed, it's not easy being green. Living with constant growth and consumption is much pleasanter. So is blowing your whole salary on payday and expecting the kids to pay for your groceries and mortgage.

Environmentally, that's what we're doing. If we think car pools and Copenhagen will get us out of our jam, we're kidding ourselves. We have a hypergreen future or none...

[Editor's note: the comment section is close for the holidays and will re-open Jan. 4th. Thanks for all your thoughtful commentary this year. Looking forward to more of the same in the next!]  [Tyee]

Read more: Environment

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Is One Art or Design Skill You Wish to Learn?

Take this week's poll