Independent
journalism that swims
against the current.
News
Health
BC Politics

Where Are the 495 Long-Term Care Beds Promised for BC’s Interior?

Expect some soon, says the health minister, nearly two years after NDP election pledge.

Andrew MacLeod 14 Mar 2022TheTyee.ca

Andrew MacLeod is The Tyee's Legislative Bureau Chief in Victoria and the author of All Together Healthy (Douglas & McIntyre, 2018). Find him on Twitter or reach him at .

A few months before the 2020 British Columbia election, the government made an “historic” announcement of 495 new long-term care beds to be created in the province’s interior region.

The promise was welcome news covered widely in the local media, but nearly two years later major questions about the beds and how they will be managed remain unanswered.

Ann Godderis, who lives in Castlegar and works in Trail, watched the announcement and what happened afterwards carefully. “It was an interest and a concern and then it just died,” she said. “We couldn’t find out anything.”

More long-term care beds are badly needed in the region, she said, but it matters a great deal whether they are really new and not just replacements for ones in older facilities that may close.

It’s also important that the beds be kept in the public sector, Godderis said.

“These beds are paid for by our money,” she said, noting the funding comes both from residents of the homes and the government. “I’m just strongly opposed to putting any money into the hands of shareholders. Private for-profit doesn’t belong in health care. I just think it’s wrong.”

The pre-election promise the government made was for 140 beds in Kelowna, 100 in Kamloops, 90 in Vernon, 90 in Penticton and 75 in Nelson.

The beds would increase the number available in the interior by 10 per cent, it said, bringing the total to 6,550.

“The plan we are setting in motion today for nearly 500 beds is what people in the region need,” Health Minister Adrian Dix said at the time. “This historical investment is a commitment to seniors living in Interior communities, an assurance that care close to home will be available, when they need it.”

Exact locations were to be determined following a bidding process. Interior Health issued five requests for proposals and the results were to be evaluated in the fall of 2020. Contracts were to be awarded in early 2021.

Meanwhile the B.C. General Employees’ Union or BCGEU campaigned against the government’s plan to contract out 85 per cent of the new beds.

“There’s no guarantee that the contracts won’t go to for-profit nursing home chains that make millions in profits by cutting corners, neglecting seniors and mistreating workers,” the union said on a page encouraging people to write to Dix and the finance minister.

“These privately-owned corporate chains have armies of lobbyists that are probably already planning ways to secure those contracts,” it said. Unless there’s a massive public outcry, they might succeed.... We can drown out the lobbyists, and stop the government from handing over more seniors' care to big corporations.”

Asked last week [March 9] for an update on the procurement process, Interior Health said, "The RFPs issued on July 13, 2020 have closed. We are currently working with the successful proponents and will have more information to share soon."

Results on the government’s B.C. Bid website show the competitions all closed in October 2020.

‘At least some’ beds to be announced: Dix

Health Minister Dix said some of the results will be released shortly. “I think you’re going to see an announcement about at least some of those beds in the next two weeks,” he said.

Some, particularly those planned for Nelson, will be public, Dix said. “Others will be similar to beds developed over time,” he said. “In other words they’ll be contract beds, they’ll be public beds in private for-profit and not-for-profit care homes.”

The government’s focus is on continuing to refurbish homes built decades ago, increase the number of available beds as the population of seniors grows, reduce the number of shared rooms, improve infection control and raise staffing standards, he said.

The president of the BCGEU, Stephanie Smith, said the union’s campaign about the new beds for the interior resulted in almost 2,000 letters written to the government.

“We want to see an end to private for-profit seniors’ care,” Smith said in an email. “We hope to hear from government soon on this RFP and on the larger goal of getting the profit motive out of seniors’ care.”

The government has taken important steps by bringing home care and contracted hospital services back into the public system, she said.

Smith noted that the BC NDP’s 2020 election platform said, “BC Liberals doled out hundreds of millions to for-profit corporations to create new care homes — and it failed miserably.”

The party’s platform also mentioned four private care homes that were put under public administration for failing to provide the required levels of care, highlighted that for-profit care home operators had failed to deliver more than 200,000 hours of care the public paid them to provide, and that there was a need for “building better, public long-term care homes.”

“We’re hoping to see government follow through on their commitments and award these new contracts to not-for-profit operators,” Smith said.

“The involvement of for-profit corporations in long-term care is a huge concern,” she added. “These companies pad their profit margins by underpaying workers and cutting corners on care — and seniors and workers suffer the consequences.”

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the dangers of a profit-driven seniors’ care system, Smith said. “Data from Ontario, where most long-term care is for-profit, show that residents were four times more likely to die during COVID-19 outbreaks in for-profit facilities than in public facilities.”

The for-profit care model is dangerous for both seniors and workers and needs to end, she said.

“Our government needs to invest in a robust system of public and not-for-profit seniors’ care,” she said. “That means no new contracts should go to for-profit long-term care companies.”

While there are circumstances where contracting to non-profit organizations makes sense — such as with “Indigenous, faith-based, and other organizations that deliver culturally informed care to seniors and Elders” — the union would like to see far less reliance on RFP processes, Smith said.

“When they are used, they should invite bids from non-profit organizations exclusively,” she said. “We don’t see any role for profit-making in the system.”

BC lags, says care providers rep

The BC Care Providers Association represents both for-profit and not-for-profit care home operators. Mike Klassen, the organization’s vice-president of public affairs, said the province is behind on developing new long-term care beds and meeting the demand will require all kinds of providers.

There are wait lists for the existing beds, the number of seniors is growing and since 2017 very few new beds have been created, he said. The BCCPA and others keep bringing the need to the government’s attention, but the requests are met with no sense of urgency.

It’s unfair to accuse for-profit providers of cutting corners, neglecting seniors and mistreating workers to turn a profit, Klassen said. “As you can imagine, we disagree with that characterization,” he said. “There are operators that are really good regardless of the funding model.”

The truth is that compared to other businesses the margins are tight for companies providing long-term care and nobody gets into it unless they care about and respect the people to whom they are providing care, he said.

“What we’re all really striving for in the sector is to develop a person-centred, or person-focused, model of care.”

Klassen also said the criticism of for-profit providers betrays a misunderstanding of how the system works.

Funding that is for care has to be spent on providing care, he said, noting that about two-thirds of the care homes in the province are run by for-profit or not-for-profit providers.

All are funded to provide the required 3.36 hours of care to each resident every day, he said. “The fact is the dollars that are put into the system, the funding that goes to care does not go to profit or shareholders or any of the things they talk about.”

In Castlegar, Godderis said she strongly believes any new facilities should be publicly owned and operated by the health authorities.

“If after COVID and with an NDP government we’re getting private operators to run new beds, wherever they are, that’s wrong,” she said.

“Everybody should be making way more than a living wage doing that kind of work and the seniors deserve as good a place to live for the end of their lives as is possible,” Godderis said. “I simply don’t believe most private operators can do that, simply because they’ve got to cut somewhere in order to put money into shareholders pockets.”

Sometime in the next couple weeks it should become clear whether or not B.C.’s NDP government believes that as well.  [Tyee]

Read more: Health, BC Politics

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

What Environmental Impacts Are Most Concerning to You This Summer?

Take this week's poll