The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Canada needs more independent media. And independent media needs you.

Did you know that most news organizations in Canada are owned by just a handful of companies? And that these companies have been shutting down newsrooms and laying off reporters continually over the past few decades?

Fact-based, credible journalism is essential to our democracy. Unlike many other newsrooms across the country, The Tyee’s independent newsroom is stable and growing.

How are we able to do this? The Tyee Builder program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip into our editorial budget so that we can keep doing what we do best: fact-based, in-depth reporting on issues that matter to our readers. No paywall. No junk. Just good journalism.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to be Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
News
  |  
BC Politics
  |  
Environment

Old-Growth Forest Logging Approvals Are Soaring in BC

Companies are rushing to get permits before protection comes for critical areas, advocates say.

Amanda Follett Hosgood 3 May 2021 | TheTyee.ca

Amanda Follett Hosgood is The Tyee’s northern B.C. reporter. She lives in Wet’suwet’en territory. Find her on Twitter @amandajfollett.

New mapping released today by the Wilderness Committee indicates the province approved significantly more old-growth logging over the past 12 months than it did the previous year.

According to the report released today, the province approved logging in 84,669 hectares of old-growth forest over the past year compared with 59,228 hectares the year prior.

Advocates speculate that the 43-per-cent increase could signal the forest industry’s push to secure harvestable timber as the province promises tighter restrictions on old-growth logging.

“The reason we ran the comparison was because I was expecting a little bit of an increase, or at the very least a flatline,” said Torrance Coste, national campaign director with the Wilderness Committee.

Even then, Coste said he found the increase surprising.

He said the decision to map cut-block approvals in old-growth forests was based on hearing concerns about the rate of logging from around the province.

The organization said that based on mapping of publicly available government data in the year leading up to April 30, the old growth approved for logging over the past 12 months is equivalent to an area slightly larger than E.C. Manning Provincial Park.

Coste said several factors could contribute to an increase in old-growth logging permits. An eight-month strike by coastal forestry workers in 2020 and ongoing mill closures and curtailments may have led to a decrease in permits in the prior year.

In addition, he said the recent spike in lumber prices could contribute to an increase in logging.

But he also speculates that the forest industry is preparing for additional restrictions on old-growth logging.

On April 30 last year, a panel reviewing old-growth logging in the province submitted its report to government. The report, A New Future for Old Forests, was made public in September and made 14 recommendations and called for a “paradigm shift” in B.C.’s approach to forestry.

That included grounding the system in a government-to-government framework with Indigenous communities.

In releasing the report, the province said it recognized the need for a new approach to managing B.C.’s ancient forests and that it would defer logging in 353,000 hectares of forest, some of which was old growth. The deferrals expire Aug. 31, 2022.

One of Premier John Horgan’s fall campaign promises was to implement the report “in its totality,” but no details on timelines or implementation plans were provided.

But advocates were left wondering about the province’s commitment to transition away from old-growth logging when it dedicated no new funding for the shift in its 2021 budget.

Instead, Finance Minister Selina Robinson said the funding already exists under the Ministry of Forests’ budget, which is set to decline 4.4 per cent this year.

In an emailed statement, a spokesperson with the Ministry of Forests acknowledged that the status quo on old-growth management needs to change.

“We inherited a patchwork of measures on old growth and we know we need a comprehensive strategy to move forward,” it said. The province is now working on next steps, including government-to-government engagement with Indigenous communities and consultation with stakeholders.

Ministry staff “are reviewing the Wilderness Committee’s findings to better understand the conclusions they came to and we will be able to fully respond once this review is complete,” it said.

Coste said delays in protecting old growth continue B.C.’s “talk and log” approach to forestry.

“No one’s saying ‘not another old-growth tree should come down,’” Coste said. “We’re saying, hit the brakes and then start planning by landscape unit, by ecosystem type and by other measures.” B.C. should be protecting an “adequate” amount of the best forests, he added.

Scientists evaluating B.C.’s approach to forestry agree there needs to be changes in how the province quantifies its forest resources.

An independent team of scientists with a background in resource management joined forces recently with the goal of informing provincial decisions on old growth. They put out a statement last week calling for forest management reforms.

The Science Advisory Group is asking the province to update land-use planning with an emphasis on old-growth protection, adjust timber harvest levels and create forest tenure reform that puts greater control in the hands of communities and First Nations.

Karen Price, an independent ecologist with the group whose research informed last year’s old-growth panel review, said the report summarizes what needs to be done to remodel forest management in the province.

A month ago, Price and co-authors Dave Daust and Rachel Holt published "Conflicting portrayals of remaining old growth: the British Columbia case" in the Canadian Journal of Forest Research. The paper includes much of the same analysis that informed the old-growth review, but in a peer-reviewed format.

It confirms that less than one per cent of B.C.’s productive forests are old growth, Price said.

“The focus of the paper is that how much old growth you think is left in B.C. depends on how you define old growth. If you call old growth anything with an old tree, then we still have a lot of it,” she said.

But according to the researchers, less than one per cent of B.C.’s forests are the highly-productive ecosystems commonly associated with old-growth forests, she said.

“If we start teasing that apart into different ecosystem types and pull apart the highly-productive, valley-bottom, big-tree ecosystems, the ones that are biodiversity hubs and carbon banks and help adapt to climate change, that’s where we get down to one per cent of B.C.’s forests,” she said.

“Essentially, the large old-growth is disappearing rapidly and almost gone.”

The Wilderness Committee mapping also shows that 80 per cent of approvals were concentrated in areas with the largest trees and highest biodiversity, Coste said.

The province has said it needs to consult with First Nations before making changes to old-growth logging. Coste said there’s no indication that’s happening.

In the meantime, the biggest trees that contribute the most to forest health are being logged, he said.

“They’ve said they’re planning to talk to all stakeholders to make sure it’s done right,” he said. “We don’t know the parameters of that, we don’t know the timeline, we don’t know if they’ll be action in the meantime. It’s extremely frustrating — and again, while logging is happening literally faster than before.”

Price added that many First Nations who have requested old-growth moratoriums and deferrals on their territories have been ignored by government.

“We know that across the province, there are nations who have requested deferrals,” she said. “What we’re not sure about is how you can argue for consultation when you’re ignoring the cases where nations are requesting a moratorium or deferrals on their land.”

Price agrees that the recent uptick in permitting likely reflects industry expectations that logging restrictions may be on the horizon.

“We would say it’s very likely,” she said. “It makes sense and matches with the way any sensible industry would work.”

How the permits translate to timber harvest on the ground remains to be seen, Coste said. While the permits open up the areas to logging, that could take years to happen.

BC Council of Forest Industries CEO Susan Yurkovich was not available for an interview and didn’t respond to a question about the increased old-growth permits.

In a statement, the council said only 30 per cent of old-growth forests are in the timber harvesting land base. “Each year, less than one per cent of the area designated for sustainable harvesting is harvested, and only about one quarter of that is old growth,” it said.

The council said it hopes the province’s review results in “a balanced, provincewide strategy for not only old growth, but all of B.C.’s forests” that ensures healthy forests, helps tackle climate change and provides stability for workers, communities and industry.

*Story updated on May 3 at 4:22 p.m. to include comment from the provincial government and the Council of Forest Industries.  [Tyee]

Read more: BC Politics, Environment

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Are You Concerned about Rising Support for Canada’s Far-Right Parties?

Take this week's poll