Building the Site C dam in northeastern British Columbia is proving more difficult than officials predicted due to unstable ground on the northern bank. Adding to concerns: myriad earthquakes.
For nearly a decade, The Tyee has reported on a rising number of earthquakes caused by the hydraulic fracturing of shale formations in the region. Now, new studies put the number of such tremors in recent years in the many thousands, raising more worries about the future of the mega-project.
Researchers warn the shaking could become strong enough to crumble critical infrastructure such as roads, high-rise buildings — and dams.
B.C.’s regulatory practices try to limit fracking after small earthquakes have been triggered. But that’s “not sufficient to protect critical or vulnerable infrastructure that have unacceptable failure consequences,” noted seismic hazard expert Gail Atkinson in the May 7 issue of Nature Reviews.
No one can yet predict frack-triggered quakes before they happen, and “hazard forecasting” remains a “critical area of research.”
Another study, released this week by researcher Ben Parfitt at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, took data from federal earthquake catalogues to show how many tremors the fracking industry is producing near the Site C dam.
The numbers are staggering. Between 2017 and 2018 alone, the industry triggered 6,551 earthquakes greater than 0.8 magnitude in the region near the troubled mega-project with a price estimate of $12 billion and rising.
Drilling by Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., for example, triggered a magnitude 4.6 earthquake in November 2018 that forced the evacuation of the Site C Dam site. It was followed by magnitude 3.5 and 4 events after the fracking ceased.
Those quakes, which shook buildings in Fort St. John, forced engineers to reassess dam safety in a region whose seismic risks have been dramatically altered by widespread fracking.
Parfitt took the recent data and asked David Leversee, an experienced mapper, to create a map showing the proximity of fracking to the Site C dam.
“The map shows that much of the area to the south of the Site C dam is riddled with faults in the shale rock where fossil fuel companies have pressure-pumped hundreds of millions of litres of water into the earth,” concludes Parfitt.
Anthony Ingraffea is a Cornell University expert on hydraulic fracturing — the injecting of liquids deep underground to fracture rock and release oil and gas for drilling. He told The Tyee that BC Hydro was “playing with fire” by building in an area made seismically active by fracking.
“Lubrication and stress changes — both results of fracking and waste injection — can activate long dormant fault systems. If one were to have accurate estimates of fault areas and these stress changes, one could estimate the largest possible magnitude, and that is the key issue, especially with respect to dam safety,” said Ingraffea.
He hopes geologists “are at work now trying to do that estimate.”
The Site C dam is intended to provide water and power for fracking operations in the Montney shale gas region, as well as subsidize electricity for the province’s liquefied natural gas industry.
For years BC Hydro and the province’s Oil and Gas Commission have been reluctant to talk about the risks that earthquakes triggered by fracking pose to dam infrastructure throughout northeastern B.C.
But in January a freedom of information request by Parfitt found a raft of correspondence that proved that officials have been concerned about the hazards posed by fracking and wastewater disposal in the region for more than a decade.
BC Hydro officials warned numerous people in the provincial government including senior bureaucrats and unidentified ministers that “fracking near its dams could have grave consequences, including the worst possible outcome — outright dam failure,” revealed Parfitt earlier this year.
He shared the documents with The Tyee, which published an extensive chronology on the science and reluctant government response to rising seismicity rates in the Montney region.
Another recent study by McGill University researchers using a different set of data collected in the same region recorded nearly 5,000 earthquakes in an area roughly 60 by 70 kilometres, southeast of Site C dam, between July 2017 and April 2019.
The industry-induced earthquakes ranged in magnitudes from 0.5 to 4.5 for the entire study period in the Dawson-Septimus area.
The researchers wrote that Montney Formation “has hosted the largest [hydraulic fracturing] induced earthquakes in Canada to date.”
They suggested that large-scale fracking had increased the pore pressure in shale rocks that underlie the region and its three dams.
Increased pressure caused by fracking connected to existing faults and destabilized a large shale area, resulting in 38 distinct swarms of earthquakes, said the researchers.
- Industrial-caused earthquakes have increased in sync with widespread utilization of hydraulic fracturing in horizontal wells in Western Canada since 2009.
- The rate of earthquakes corresponds directly with the increase in hydraulic fracturing.
- The incidence of fracking-triggered earthquakes varies widely across Western Canada but is most pronounced in the Montney shale gas formation in northeastern B.C. as reported by The Tyee for nearly a decade.
- Industry-made quakes in shale formations are chaotic because researchers can’t predict where the faults are or how they will behave.
- Hydraulic fracturing can trigger seismic activity hundreds of metres above the zone being fractured or the target formation one to two kilometres away. Earthquakes can also occur days or years after a shale zone has been fractured.
- No geologic formation is immune to fracking-triggered seismicity, but some formations, such as the Montney, seem more prone than others.
- Large injection volumes may affect a larger area and thus enhance the likelihood that stress perturbations reach critically stressed faults.
- The number of fracked wells in Western Canada that cause earthquakes over a magnitude of 3.0 lies between one out of 100 and one out of 200. The association rate appears to be rising slowly over time. “Although susceptibility is widely variable,” write the researchers, “we have no reason to believe that any formations are immune to the potential for induced seismicity.”
- The hazard from earth tremors caused by fracking could have serious consequences for seismic safety of nearby infrastructure just 10 kilometres away.
- As has occurred in China, hydraulic fracturing can trigger earthquakes large enough to bring down buildings and cause landslides — the necessary magnitudes generally exceeding 4.0.
- Whether a certain fracking operation will cause earthquakes before starting can’t be confidently predicted. Current “risk-mitigation strategies,” such as halting fracking after earthquakes, “have not yet proved reliable.”
The potential threat posed by fracking-triggered earthquakes does not just apply to the Site C project and other dams in northern B.C. In Alberta, TransAlta Corp. is contesting applications to frack near the Brazeau hydroelectric facility which includes earthen power canal dykes, a main dam, a spillway and a powerhouse.