We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
News
  |  
Rights + Justice
  |  
Coronavirus
  |  
Labour + Industry

Employers, Workers Agree: BC Labour Laws Don’t Work Right Now

Long layoffs mean employees lose the right to return to their jobs and businesses face big severance costs.

Andrew MacLeod 1 Jun 2020 | TheTyee.ca

Andrew MacLeod is The Tyee's Legislative Bureau Chief in Victoria and the author of All Together Healthy (Douglas & McIntyre, 2018). Find him on Twitter or reach him at

At 57, Darcy Dawson figured his job as a server in the restaurant at the Holiday Inn and Suites in downtown Vancouver would be his last before retirement. Then the COVID-19 pandemic arrived and Dawson became one of the 400,000 people in the province thrown out of work.

“It’s a little scary these days,” he said. “Sometimes I’m OK, then some days I can’t sleep. Some days I have a lot of anxiety.”

His partner worked in a casino and was laid off from his job in March as well. Thanks to employment insurance and the emergency benefits they’ve been OK, despite getting by on much less money than normal.

But Dawson says his concern is about the future.

His access to extended medical benefits will end in June. And if the layoff continues for another few months he may lose the right to return to his job when the business reopens.

Dawson is a member of Unite Here Local 40 — a union representing workers in B.C. hotels, food services and airports. The collective agreement with the hotel guarantees Dawson and his former co-workers the right to return to their jobs when it begins adding staff again — but only if that return happens within six months of the layoffs.

“Our union reps were saying if we don’t go back before that six months, then everyone loses their jobs,” Dawson said, adding he doubts work will resume by the September deadline. “If we don’t go back we lose our seniority, we lose our wage.”

Some of his co-workers have worked at the hotel for 30 years and everyone should be treated fairly, he said.

“It’s not our fault the virus came out, so we should be able to come back to our jobs as we left it.” The workers have a car parade protest planned for noon Wednesday and Dawson said he hopes it draws the attention of the provincial government. It has the power to extend the recall period and give workers that added security, he said.

Even with the immense uncertainty, Dawson is better protected than many workers.

British Columbia’s labour laws don’t include any provisions that require an employer who is reopening to bring back workers who have been laid off.

“It really leaves it up to the employer to decide whether to bring someone back,” said Michelle Travis, the research director for Unite Here Local 40. “That leaves non-union workers vulnerable to losing everything they worked for before the pandemic. That's why it is so important to figure out what recourse workers can have to go back to their jobs.”

When the pandemic began, the hotel and hospitality sector was among the first and hardest hit and it will be one of the last to recover, Travis said.

“We’re looking at a long period of downturn and recovery,” Travis said, pointing out that conferences remain cancelled for the foreseeable future and people in the industry are saying the sector could take a couple years to recover. “Our concern is it could be used as an opportunity to replace workers. That’s the worst-case scenario.”

The union wants the government to extend the right-of-recall period to 24 months, both for union and non-union workers, Travis said. It also wants the government to make any aid to businesses contingent on offering jobs first to the people who had been working for them before the pandemic.

Recent polling commissioned by the union found 92-per-cent public support for both policies. The online survey of 400 B.C. residents conducted in early May has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.9 per cent.

“We were frankly surprised by the poll results,” Travis said. “It was a lot higher than we would have expected.”

B.C. Premier John Horgan said he supports the principle. “I believe that businesses should be looking at their previous employees as they start to contemplate when it’s appropriate for them to restart,” he said.

“I’m counting on businesses that were successful with their workforce to look to that workforce to return as quickly as possible provided it’s safe to do so,” he said.

Travis from Unite Here said that while the premier’s support is welcome, something stronger is needed. “They are going to have to compel employers to do the right thing.”

The CEO of the British Columbia Hotel Association, Ingrid Jarrett, said the right to be recalled is usually a matter for contract negotiations and she was unaware of any proposal to extend it to non-unionized employees.

It’s in everyone’s interest to get back to business as usual as soon as possible and hotel owners will want to do what they can to retain staff, she said in a phone interview from the Okanagan.

“Nobody wanted to lay anybody off,” Jarrett said. “The hotel community, the last thing they want to do is sever their employer-employee relationship.... They have no intention of severing that relationship as long as they can.”

The labour market was tight before the pandemic and before long it may again become difficult for businesses to find employees, she said. “There would be no reason somebody wouldn’t rehire somebody who was trained and a long-time employee.”

Jarrett said the sector is facing a bigger challenge. Many laid-off employees will soon be deemed “terminated” under B.C.’s labour laws, she said.

Under the Employment Standards Act an employee who isn’t being recalled from a layoff is entitled to severance pay or working notice. The longer a person has been working for the employer the more notice or pay they are entitled to, with a maximum of eight weeks for people who have worked eight years or more.

In early May the B.C. cabinet extended the amount of time an employee can be laid off before they are considered terminated and eligible for severance pay.

Under the new rule, an employer can lay off a worker for reasons related to COVID-19 for up to 16 weeks (up from the previous 13) in a 20-consecutive-week period without triggering termination and severance pay requirements.

For many businesses that laid workers off in March, the 16-week point will be at the end of June.

If the law isn’t changed, Jarrett said, “the majority of the hotels will go insolvent overnight.”

The government needs to understand the hardship the sector is facing, she said. The longer the state of emergency continues with the lack of clarity on what travel is allowed, the harder it will be for hotels to rebuild, she said.

“Honestly none of us have any idea what business will look like this summer and they’re all just trying to survive.”  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities

Do:

  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other

The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Do You Try to Eat Local Where You Live?

Take this week's poll