We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
BC Election 2019 Category
Election 2019
Rights + Justice

Young Scheer Was Even More Anti-Gay Marriage than Harper

2005 video shows today’s Tory leader occupied far-right fringe of his party.

By David Beers 22 Aug 2019 | TheTyee.ca

David Beers founded The Tyee and is editor for initiatives. You can read more of his stories here.

The federal Liberals have unearthed a 2005 video in which Andrew Scheer, now running to be Canada’s Conservative prime minister, rejects any form of gay marriage.

In so doing, he staked out a position that at the time was more to the right of even Stephen Harper’s.

Let’s look at the record. In the resurfaced video, Scheer says, “Two members of the same sex may use their God-given free will to engage in acts, to cohabit and to own property together.

“In that sense, they have many of the collateral features of marriage,” Scheer explains, “but they do not have its inherent feature, as they cannot commit to the natural procreation of children. They cannot therefore be married.”

Just the year before, Harper had grudgingly endorsed civil same-sex unions outside of church weddings.

Tom Barrett traced Harper’s views on the matter in a Tyee article published in 2004:

“In 1994, the Calgary Herald ran a headline stating ‘Two Calgary Reformers Back Gay Rights.’ Harper, who was one of the Reformers named in the article, would later tell Western Report magazine: ‘I really got burned in the press on this one.’ Harper explained to the magazine that his true position on gay rights was ‘don’t ask, don’t tell.’

“Gays, he said, should be protected from discrimination in commercial or employment practices. He said he would accept the inclusion of ‘sexual orientation’ in the Canadian Human Rights Act if it were ‘clearly defined, but not if it were used as a precedent for further benefits like marital status,’ the magazine stated.”

In 1994, Barrett reported, Harper was unequivocal in stating: “I do not support the legal recognition of same-sex relationships.”

By 2004, ten years later, Harper was telling CanWest News that his position on the issue had evolved. But not to affirming equality. Harper now said he would accept the concept of same-sex civil unions under provincial laws but opposed requiring churches to confirm same-sex marriages.

Scheer apparently had not accompanied Harper even that far on his moral and intellectual journey. In addressing the House of Commons in 2005, he clearly, if pedantically, lays out his position:

“How many legs would a dog have if you counted the tail as a leg? The answer is just four. Just because a tail is called a leg does not make it a leg. If Bill C-38 passes, governments and individual Canadians will be forced to call a tail a leg, nothing more, but that is not inconsequential, for its effect on marriage, such an integral building block of our society, would have far-reaching effects.”

What Scheer terror did gay marriage prompt in the young MP, 25 at the time?

Society’s “very survival requires” conceiving and raising children, he argued. “Homosexual unions are by nature contradictory to this.”  As if no straight people ever adopted children or conceived artificially.

The Toronto Star today reported that a Conservative campaign official said Scheer “supports same-sex marriage as defined in law and as prime minister will, of course, uphold it.”

However, “the Scheer campaign did not say whether Scheer’s personal beliefs on same-sex marriage had evolved, nor did they respond to the question of Scheer’s continued refusal to participate in Pride parades.”

The Tyee’s federal election coverage is made possible by readers who pitched in to our election reporting fund. Read more about how The Tyee developed our reader-powered election reporting plan and see all of our stories here.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities


  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Do You Want Candidates to Be Discussing as They Compete for Votes This Election?

Take this week's poll