The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Canada needs more independent media. And independent media needs you.

Did you know that most news organizations in Canada are owned by just a handful of companies? And that these companies have been shutting down newsrooms and laying off reporters continually over the past few decades?

Fact-based, credible journalism is essential to our democracy. Unlike many other newsrooms across the country, The Tyee’s independent newsroom is stable and growing.

How are we able to do this? The Tyee Builder program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip into our editorial budget so that we can keep doing what we do best: fact-based, in-depth reporting on issues that matter to our readers. No paywall. No junk. Just good journalism.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to be Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
News

Police Still Secretly Tracking TransLink Riders? Yes, Even More

Two years after sparking a provincial probe, Tyee finds practice has grown.

By Bryan Carney 12 Apr 2019 | TheTyee.ca

Bryan Carney is director of web production at The Tyee and reports on technology and privacy issues. You can follow his very occasional tweets at @bpcarney.

What happened after The Tyee exposed that TransLink increasingly was handing over data about its riders to police without informing customers or requiring any warrants?

That was in August 2017.

A follow-up Tyee investigation finds police tracking of TransLink riders has since intensified.

And a probe by B.C.’s Information and Privacy Commissioner triggered by The Tyee’s report quietly wrapped up four months ago without telling the public or resulting in any new safeguards.

The fact the data sharing continues without any moves to protect riders’ privacy or ability to know is “tremendously disappointing,” said Micheal Vonn, policy director for the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association.

But TransLink emphasized that the province’s investigation concluded the transit authority broke no laws by secretly sharing customers’ information with police.

TransLink’s data can reveal to police, without the rider’s knowledge, their name, email address, phone number and every trip taken with a Compass card or fare purchased from a kiosk with a credit or debit card.

In July 2017, TransLink responded to a Tyee freedom of information request saying it had received 132 police requests for such information, granting 82. The number of times law enforcers sought and received such information had risen since 2016. In the whole of that year, police had made 147 requests and were granted 111.

In 2015, The Tyee learned, TransLink fielded only 16 such requests, granting 10.

The Tyee’s report published Aug. 8, 2017, noted there was no independent oversight in place to weigh the police requests, nor were riders informed their data was shared.

The same is true today, even as TransLink gives more rider data to law enforcement.

In 2018, TransLink received 342 requests for personally identifying data about transit riders and handed the information over 133 times.

In 2017, TransLink received 310 requests from police and granted it 182 times.

Meanwhile, a 16-month provincial investigation by B.C.’s Information and Privacy Commissioner into TransLink’s sharing of personal info concluded last December.

TransLink spokesperson Jill Drews said the commissioner’s investigation found TransLink was not in violation of privacy law.

The privacy commissioner’s office did not respond when The Tyee asked if a public summary of the investigation was made available. The Tyee searched for one online, finding nothing.

A spokesperson for the privacy commissioner told The Tyee that TransLink has committed to producing a “transparency report” by July 2019.

The company will now annually release the number of times it shares data with law enforcement, said TransLink’s Drews. However, no numbers have been released to date.

Drews did not provide any other changes in policy the company is adopting.

However, while police requests have grown compared to several years ago, the rate of approvals has dropped. So far in 2019, only 17 requests out of 84 have been granted, an approval rate of just over 20 per cent. In 2017, the approval rate was 59 per cent and in 2018 it dropped to 39 per cent.

582px version of PastedGraphic-1.jpg
Number of annual police requests (red) for transit rider identities and trips taken, against the number of those that were granted (green) since TransLink began tracking them in 2015. Image by Bryan Carney.

Still, because there are so many more police requests, last year TransLink shared riders’ data with police 13 times more often than in 2015.

The BCCLA’s Vonn said that promises TransLink will be more transparent do not adequately address the ongoing threat posed to riders’ privacy.

“What kind of signage would be appropriate?” she asked, offering: “‘Translink — disrespecting your privacy, now with greater transparency!’” 

“We had every reason to believe that TransLink was going to respond with policy changes when this story first broke,” said Vonn.

To hear no policy changes are in the works, she said, is “tremendously disappointing.”  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities

Do:

  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Do You Think the Injunction at Fairy Creek Will Be Reinstated?

Take this week's poll