Independent
journalism that swims
against the current.
News
Education
BC Politics

School Funding Review Won’t Include Amount of Money, Private Schools

More details on the education funding formula review include review panel members, guidelines for new formula.

Katie Hyslop 6 Mar 2018TheTyee.ca

Katie Hyslop is The Tyee's education and youth reporter. Find her previous stories here.

The NDP government is following up on a promise to review how public schools from Kindergarten to Grade 12 are funded.

But the review, which will look at how money is distributed to the province’s 60 school districts, won’t include how much money they receive or how the province subsidizes independent or private schools.

A press release issued by the Ministry of Education Thursday laid out the guiding principles for a new funding formula to distribute the $5.65 billion in operational funding among the districts, which increases to $5.75 billion next year. Developed with the BC School Trustees Association, the guidelines are:

  1. Be responsive: distribute money amongst the boards in a way that keeps in mind unique local needs and provincial education priorities;

  2. Be equitable: ensure students across the province have equitable access to the same or comparable education and opportunities
  3. Be stable and predictable: by offering a consistent level of funding year over year, school boards are able to plan budgets and district operations for multiple years instead of just one;
  4. Be flexible: respect school districts’ autonomy from the ministry in terms of running their own budgets without unnecessary restrictions;
  5. Be transparent: funding allocations to districts must be calculated out in the open using methods the public and district can understand;
  6. Be accountable: ensure school funding arrives on time, while ensuring that districts spend the money where they’re supposed to.

The review panel will be chaired by Chris Trumpy, former deputy minister of finance who worked under NDP and Liberal governments and who also led the government’s fiscal review of Crown corporations last fall.

Joining him on the panel will be Piet Langstraat, superintendent of the Greater Victoria School District; Flavia Coughlan, secretary-treasurer at the Maple Ridge School District and vice-president of the B.C. Association of School Business Officials; Angus Wilson, superintendent of the Mission School District; Philip Steenkamp, current vice-president external relations at the University of British Columbia and former deputy minister in several Liberal government ministries including Advanced Education; Kelly Pollack, founder and former CEO of Immigrant Employment Council of B.C.; and Lynda Minnabarriet, secretary-treasurer for the Gold Trail School District.

The panel will conduct consultations with education stakeholders this spring, and then submit their report on the recommended funding formula to government. The ministry plans to have a new funding formula in place for the 2019/20 school year.

BC Teachers’ Federation President Glen Hansman says the teachers’ union is pleased with the guiding principles and panel makeup, though it would have preferred at least one teacher sitting on the panel. The union is disappointed, however, the review won’t include the amount of funding.

“We feel that it would be appropriate for the panel to also review the quantum, as well,” Hansman said, adding this was outlined in the union’s funding formula review brief to the ministry last month where it referenced funding formula reviews in Belgium and Australia where final recommendations included increased education funding.

The review comes 16 years after the previous Liberal government changed the funding formula without a review.

“I know the last major [funding formula] review was a while before that, and there’s been some different pieces bolted on over time... so it’s not as clean as it was when the original review was done,” said Gordon Swan, president of the BC School Trustees Association. “We’re also looking forward to having a discussion at some time in the future about the overall funding.”

Independent schools received $398.5 million in operations funding for the 2017/18 school year, going up to $426.3 million next year. The amount of money each private school receives depends on which of the four categories it falls under.

Group 1 schools, whose per student costs are similar to public schools, receive 50 per cent of per student funding of the school district in which they reside. Group 2 schools spend more per student than public schools and therefore only receive 35 per cent of the district’s per student funds. Group 3 and 4 schools, which encompass approximately three dozen of the 363 independent schools in the province, do not receive government funding. None of the groups receive funding for capital costs.

The teachers’ union has repeatedly called on the province to stop funding independent schools, including it in its submission to the Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government last fall.

The Federation of Independent Schools Association of BC did provide input to the Ministry about the review, alongside other stakeholders like the BC Teachers’ Federation and the BC School Trustees Association.

In an email to The Tyee, Peter Froese, president of the Federation of Independent Schools Association of BC, pointed out that while they are not part of the review, the outcome will impact them.

“We expect to see operating grants in some districts to decrease and increase in others. Independent schools in these districts will see a change in their funding,” he wrote, though the overall amount of funding will not change.  [Tyee]

Read more: Education, BC Politics

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Who Do You Think Will Win the Conservative Leadership Race?

Take this week's poll