The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
Get our free newsletter
Sign Up
Urban Planning + Architecture

A Brilliant Chance to Polish a Transit Hub Jewel

It’s a problem that Waterfront Station is privately owned. Why it should belong to us.

Michael Alexander 27 Jan 2021 |

Michael Alexander is the retired founding director of SFU City Conversations, and a member of the Downtown Waterfront Working Group.

This month, New York City got an expensive lesson about why public transportation facilities should be publicly owned. It’s a wake-up for we who live in British Columbia’s Lower Mainland.

Waterfront Station, at the foot of Vancouver’s Granville and Seymour streets, is the flagship station for Metro Vancouver’s TransLink. The complex offers direct connections to Richmond, YVR, Surrey, the eastern and southern suburbs (via SkyTrain and West Coast Express), the North Shore (via ferry), Rapid and local buses, and adjacent cruise ships, helicopters, float planes, convention centres and hotels. It has nearly 13 million passenger boardings a year, about five million more than for users of the next busiest TransLink station. In the climate-warming decades to come, ridership will increase.

The historic 1914 building, built as the western terminus of the transcontinental Canadian Pacific Railway, serves as a lovely public entry and meeting hall.

Most people are surprised to learn that it’s owned by a private developer, Cadillac Fairview, which rents transit and office space to TransLink. The actual transit facilities are underground, or in a shabby shed attached to the building’s north side, a sad space much like New York City's tawdry underground Penn Station, detested by its daily 600,000 commuters.

But this month, New Yorkers got a huge improvement, the fabulous Moynihan Train Hall, built inside an elegant and gigantic former post office building across the street from the underground facility.

The new train hall cost US$1.6 billion, serves only half of Penn Station's train lines, and will cost another billion to restore all the service New Yorkers, commuters and visitors once enjoyed. But it has become a cultural sensation, and an instant destination. A New York Times headline gushed, “Moynihan Train Hall has achieved the near impossible; it has left New Yorkers feeling inspired."

The Moynihan Train Hall, built inside a former post office building across the street from Penn Station’s underground facility, has caused a sensation among New Yorkers. Image via Amtrak.

Therein lies a cautionary tale, and a lesson for Vancouver, the Lower Mainland, and all three levels of government.

In the early 20th century when trains provided most suburban and intercity transportation, private railroads built stations sized and designed to the importance of the location. Penn Station, on the west side of Manhattan, was spectacular: a Beaux-Arts masterpiece designed by the august architectural firm McKim, Mead and White.

By the mid-1940s, it served more than 100 million passengers a year. But starting a decade later, air and interstate highway travel led to dramatic rail passenger declines. Looking to improve its bottom line, in 1962 the Pennsylvania Railroad sold the station’s air rights to a private developer to build the Madison Square Garden sports complex. In exchange, the railroad got a 25 per cent stake in Madison Square Garden, and a no-cost, smaller underground station in the basement, built on the cheap.

851px version of PennStationInteriorSepia.jpg
Pennsylvania Station, built on the west side of Manhattan in 1910, was a Beaux-Arts masterpiece, sold to private developers and demolished in 1963 to make way for Madison Square Garden, pushing travelers drably underground. A critic wrote: ‘One entered the city like a god. One scuttles in now like a rat.’ Photos: Wikipedia.

The demolition of the McKim, Mead and White building, and its sad replacement, caused an international uproar. “One entered the city like a god. One scuttles in now like a rat,” the architectural historian Vincent Scully famously wrote in the New York Times.

Public outrage catalyzed the architectural preservation movement in the U.S., new laws were passed to restrict such demolition, and landmark preservation was upheld by the courts in 1978, after the private Penn Central railroad tried to demolish New York’s other great railroad treasure, Grand Central Station.

Today, Penn Station serves more than 600,000 commuter rail and Amtrak passengers on an average weekday, and arrivals and departures have doubled since the 1970s.

Lessons for Vancouver

Like the original Penn Station, Waterfront Station’s owner wants to maximize its profits. First proposed in 2015, Cadillac Fairview aspires to build a private, ultramodern 26-storey office tower on a wedge of parking lot next to the station. It was quickly nicknamed the Ice Pick.

851px version of IcePickRendition.jpg
This proposed tower affixed to Waterfront Station has been nicknamed 'the Ice Pick.’ It could compromise the creation of a new transit galleria and the turning of the parking lot into a great public space with incredible views of water and mountains. Image via Cadillac Fairview.

Cadillac Fairview has started, proposed and withdrawn different designs over the past six years. Whether you like the Ice Pick’s look, or not, is not the point. Its location between two historic buildings at the entry to Gastown has led the city’s advisory Urban Design Panel and its Heritage Commission to reject it. More fundamentally, since 2009 the city has had preliminary plans to replace the tawdry existing transit shed with a great, glassy public hall: a transit and visitor entry to Vancouver, with views of water and mountains, transportation and history, urban commerce and pleasurable public space. Something like Liverpool Station in London.

851px version of LiverpoolStationInterior.jpg
Liverpool Station in London, UK. Vancouver’s adopted plan proposes a similar treatment for a Waterfront Station expansion. Photo via Shutterstock.

It’s part of an overall planning framework for the Downtown Waterfront. Full disclosure: I’m a member of the Downtown Waterfront Working Group of planners, architects and urbanists convinced that the city’s waterfront plan needs to be updated before consideration of any new developments.

The Cadillac Fairview office tower could severely compromise or eliminate the opportunity for a public transit galleria that would be the region’s fully functioning transit centrepiece for the 21st century.

Now there’s a new opportunity, involving all three levels of government. Last month, to help the country’s economic recovery once the pandemic is contained, Ottawa’s federal fiscal update promised to spend “up to $100 billion” on “smart investments that have value now, and well into the future.” The Globe and Mail quickly recommended “some big investments in public transit.” Here’s one:

The federal government joins with the province to buy Waterfront Station. Which will insure opportunities for transit and public improvements. (All other metro transit stations are publicly owned.)

582px version of WaterfrontStationPlazaRendition.jpg
Absent 'the Ice Pick,’ the parking lot would become a public plaza between two historic buildings, with spectacular views of water and mountains. Drawing by Terry Sunderland.

Waterfront Station and its adjoining parking lot has a 2020 assessed value of only $68 million, down ten per cent from last year. Ottawa could provide the cash, or join with the province and city to trade for another downtown development site. We’ve identified two: a 1960s city-owned parkade in a prime location, and an underused federal property. Surely, there are others.

Public ownership of Waterfront Station would afford many benefits:

TransLink could improve transit connections for commuters, airport travellers and tourists on the adjacent cruise ships.

For visitors, Waterfront Station becomes the welcoming entry to historic Gastown.

Future station planning and operations become much easier and less expensive.

The parking lot becomes a public plaza with spectacular water and mountain views that define Vancouver.

It’s no crime for a private company to maximize its property values. But losing the opportunity to maximize public transit benefits for future generations— that would be a crime.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities


  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll