We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Analysis
  |  
BC Election 2020
  |  
BC Politics

BC’s Liberals Appear Headed for an Ugly Divorce

Advocates for opposite visions of how to remake the party seem poised to tear it apart.

Paul Willcocks 2 Nov 2020 | TheTyee.ca

Paul Willcocks is a journalist and former publisher of newspapers, and now an editor with The Tyee.

I was having second thoughts about an election night column saying the BC Liberals faced an existential crisis.

Later reports from Elections BC seemed to offer some hope for the Liberals, suggesting the party’s supporters didn’t desert it for a new love. They just stayed home. Which would mean, theoretically, that they could be wooed back by 2024.

But as the week went on, the party’s dire — perhaps hopeless state — become evident.

First, the faint hope for the Liberals. It looks like, when all the votes are counted, about 150,000 fewer people will have voted in this election. If the mail results follow the election day pattern, the Liberals will end up 154,000 fewer votes than four years ago.

And it’s not like there was a tidal wave of support for the NDP. They’re on track to add 27,000 votes to their 2017 total, despite good marks for the pandemic. (The Greens will be down 55,000 votes, but that’s largely explained by the party’s inability to run candidates in 13 ridings this time.)

So you could argue that Liberal supporters just stayed home this time. And that with a new leader and better campaign those people can be won back.

But you’d be wrong. The Ladies Home Journal’s most popular column for more than three decades was “Can This Marriage Be Saved?” Both partners in a failing relationship would tell their radically different stories and a counsellor would say how — or if — divorce could be avoided.

Based on the post-election comments, the BC Liberal marriage of federal Conservatives and Liberals can’t be saved.

Bill Bennett, a cabinet minister in the Gordon Campbell and Christy Clark governments from the Kootenays, wants the party to shift right.

“The B.C. Liberal party has time to renew and rebrand,” he tweeted Wednesday. “If the party fails to respond constructively, quickly and courageously, conservatives will go elsewhere, including some sitting MLAs.” (It’s worth noting that Bennett co-chaired Wilkinson’s leadership campaign.)

Jas Johal, a high-profile Liberal MLA defeated in Richmond-Queensborough, saw things differently, criticizing the party’s social conservative wing and its failure to offer policies that address the issues of urban British Columbia.

“It can’t just all be about sawmills and LNG and an industrial economy,” Johal said. “We’re not having that broader modern conversation. We’ve got to start talking that urban language.”

Liberal party membership chair Nicole Paul had taken a similar position before the election. “We have a problem in the leadership of the party and their lack of willingness to stand up for diversity, inclusion and the values of BC Liberal members — not just the interests of a small group of constituents,” she tweeted.

But long-term Liberal Rich Coleman told the B.C. Catholic, a weekly newspaper published by the Vancouver archdiocese, that the party needs to woo conservatives back.

“We go and reach out again to our conservative friends and — I’m a conservative, so it’s not hard — so people will have this realization, and I think we’ll make it back together,” said Coleman, who last year cited his religious beliefs in opposing both abortion and medically-assisted death.

In short, you’ve got two camps that agree change is needed, but have entirely opposite ideas about what that change should be. One wing thinks the party should be more like the federal Liberals to appeal to urban voters.

The other camp think the party needs to be more conservative to hold its rural and social conservative supporters. Some in that camp, like Peace River South MLA Mike Bernier, say the party needs a name change, the federal Liberal brand being so odious to supporters.

There’s no way of forging a compromise that melds such polarized views about the party’s direction. And either option risks disaster.

Swing right, and the Liberals will be rejected in urban areas. Move to the centre and the door is open, as Bennett noted, to the emergence of a new party — like the BC Conservatives.

Despite the snap election and just 19 candidates, the Conservatives were a factor in this election. They likely cost the Liberals three seats in close ridings, and averaged an 11-per-cent share of the popular vote in ridings they contested.

It’s tough to see a way forward for the Liberals as they try to pick up the pieces after this election.

Especially as the NDP has broadened its base. A Research Co. exit poll found 25 per cent of New Democrat voters had backed the federal Liberals in the last election. The Horgan government may have disappointed some supporters with its slow pace of traditional NDP issues, but it won over other voters.

Can this marriage be saved? Probably not.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities

Do:

  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Should Canada Have a Co-ordinated National Response to COVID-19?

Take this week's poll