We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
BC Election 2019 Category
Opinion
  |  
Election 2019

Scheer Wants You to Think Abortion Access Would Be Protected If He Wins. It Wouldn’t

Pro-life groups helped him win the leadership and are campaigning for Conservative allies.

Paul Willcocks 11 Sep 2019 | TheTyee.ca

Paul Willcocks is a journalist and former publisher of newspapers, and now an editor with The Tyee.

Andrew Scheer has an abortion problem.

The Conservative party leader has walked — or stumbled — along a tightrope on the issue. He’s trying to convince anti-abortion religious conservatives who helped him win the party leadership that he’s on their side, while assuring mainstream voters he’d never allow new laws restricting abortion.

It’s a contradiction that even baffles Conservative insiders.

Like Olympic gold medalist Sylvie Frechette, a star candidate in Quebec. She told a Radio Canada host that a Conservative government would not allow MPs to re-open the abortion debate.

Two other Quebec candidates, Isabelle Lapointe and Jessica Ebacher, also said the party was clear the debate “wouldn’t be reopened.” They wouldn’t have run for the Conservatives without the guarantee, they said.

And MP Alain Rayes, in charge of recruiting candidates in Quebec, said in an interview that Conservatives would be barred from raising the issue. “Andrew Scheer has confirmed that he will not allow even one of his MPs to present an anti-abortion bill,” Rayes said.

Not true, said Scheer’s office. Raye must have “misheard” the party’s position on abortion.

Scheer’s efforts to clarify his views on abortion just made things murkier. “I will not re-open this debate and I will oppose any plan to re-open this debate,” he told reporters.

But he also said Conservative MPs would be allowed to introduce legislation limiting access to abortion. And to vote for restricting access, if that was their personal view. And while he would expect cabinet ministers to vote against limiting access, he wouldn’t demand they do.

All of which leaves at least the possibility that under a Scheer Conservative government, new laws could limit Canadians’ access to abortion.

Scheer says that his approach is the same as the Stephen Harper government. Conservative MPs introduced three bills aimed at restricting access to abortion in the Harper years; all were defeated.

But there are some big differences.

First, Harper had united the right and vanquished the Liberals. He had earned respect from caucus and kept tight control. Scheer, however, limped into the leadership. He was the first choice of just 22 per cent of party members and, after 13 ballots, eked out a win with 51 per cent of votes to Maxime Bernier’s 49 per cent. It’s not a mandate that gives a leader great authority.

Second, Harper never seemed particularly committed to religious conservative causes. Scheer, however, is ranked as “100-per-cent prolife,” by anti-abortion political group RightNow, “arguably the most pro-life leader the Conservative Party of Canada has seen since John Diefenbaker.” (Whose term as leader ended more than 50 years ago.) Scheer’s opposition to same sex marriage in a rather odd 2005 Commons speech released by the Liberals suggests a real commitment to religious conservatism.

Third, Scheer owes anti-abortion groups, who backed his leadership campaign. Rival Brad Trost, who finished fourth, says Scheer wouldn’t have won the leadership without their support.

And fourth, anti-abortion forces, while a small minority, have found ways to exercise great influence (like helping Scheer get his chance to be prime minister).

RightNow, for example, boasts of its success in working with other anti-abortion groups to shape Conservative policy at its convention last year. RightNow credits a careful, strategic campaign to ensure sympathetic delegates made it to the convention, controlled the policy process and won support for religious conservative policies.

“We worked with other pro-life organizations… to ensure that we had young, female, pro-life speakers in the break-out session and the plenary session to speak for pro-life policies,” RightNow wrote. “We identified and worked with young, pro-life politicians… to speak to our pro-life policy proposals in both the break-out and plenary sessions. We provided these speakers with prepared texts and worked with them to add their own voices to the texts… We hosted an extremely popular hospitality suite.”

The efforts paid off, as a number of resolutions supported by the groups became party policy. They missed the winning the big prize — a motion to rescind the current policy that says “A Conservative Government will not support any legislation to regulate abortion” failed to pass. But the margin — 806 to 701 — was narrow and RightNow is already planning for victory at the next convention in 2020.

Anti-abortion activists are a fringe group. More than 75 per cent of Canadians support access to abortion; only about 12 per cent want it banned.

But they’re committed to the cause, acting on what they believe are the wishes of the God they worship. (Which means there is not much point in attempting to change their minds, a fact I urge readers to consider if they participate in the comment section below this article.)

And they can be politically effective, nominating candidates who will support their positions and campaigning for them. (Although, perhaps as a result, parties are increasingly taking the nomination process away from riding associations.)

RightNow says it has targeted 50 swing ridings across Canada where it plans to recruit and train volunteers to campaign for Conservative candidates who oppose abortion and right-to-die laws. Campaign Life Coalition has an online voter’s guide and is already endorsing 15 candidates in B.C. Only eight are Conservatives. The group, not pragmatic, is backing no-hope People’s Party and Christian Heritage candidates in another seven ridings. Still, in close races, even that could be bad news for the Conservatives.

In close races — and close elections like this one — a small committed group can decide who wins and which party forms government.

And, despite the significant procedural hurdles, the candidates they help elect — from any party — could pass legislation that would limit rights based on their religious agenda. (Green Leader Elizabeth May has also struggled with the issue. While Green MPs would have freedom to vote as they choose, screening will ensure no one who supports new laws to restrict access to abortion could become a candidate, the party says.)

The Conservatives would like voters to forget about the issue.

But so far, nothing Scheer has said has truly closed the door on new laws to limit access to abortion under a Conservative government.

The Tyee’s federal election coverage is made possible by readers who pitched in to our election reporting fund. Read more about how The Tyee developed our reader-powered election reporting plan and see all of our stories here.  [Tyee]

Read more: Election 2019

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Get The Tyee in your inbox

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities

Do:

  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

How do you like our new home page?

Take this week's poll