Independent
journalism that swims
against the current.
News
Energy
BC Politics
Environment

Critics Aren’t Buying BC’s New Climate Plan

Measures include upping the carbon tax, pushing zero-emission vehicles and transit and reducing industrial methane emissions.

Andrew MacLeod 26 Oct 2021TheTyee.ca

Andrew MacLeod is The Tyee's Legislative Bureau Chief in Victoria and the author of All Together Healthy (Douglas & McIntyre, 2018). Find him on Twitter or reach him at .

The B.C. government says a new climate plan will let it meet the legislated target for greenhouse gas emission reductions by 2030. But critics say it won’t work because the plan allows the oil and gas sector to continue to grow.

Premier John Horgan announced the plan Monday.

“I've had the honour of being premier for four summers now, and three of those four summers were the worst fire seasons in B.C. history,” he said. “Add onto that the devastation of the heat dome this past summer and I think all British Columbians... are focused on making progress on climate change not sometime in the future, but right now.”

The Roadmap to 2030 builds on 2018’s CleanBC plan that identified about three-quarters of the greenhouse gas emission reductions needed to meet the province’s legislated goal of a 40-per-cent drop below 2007 levels by 2030.

The plan closes the gap with new reductions planned for several sectors. Measures include increasing the carbon tax, accelerating the adoption of zero-emission vehicles, encouraging more use of public transit, reducing industrial methane emissions and strengthening pollution standards in B.C.’s building code.

B.C.’s climate change accountability law requires deeper cuts by 2040 and 2050. The government missed a previous goal of a 33-per-cent reduction by 2020, with emissions instead remaining more or less unchanged from 2007 levels.

“One of the important features of our Roadmap to 2030 is our reporting every year on how we're doing, as well as new measures we plan to take,” said George Heyman, the minister responsible for environment and climate change strategy. “We plan to evaluate what we're doing and ensure that we're current with the latest technologies, the latest sources of energy, and that we're moving accordingly.”

Green Party Leader Sonia Furstenau said continued subsidies to fossil fuel companies are undermining the province’s ability to be a climate leader and achieve its emission reduction goals.

“Between now and 2030, B.C. will see a marked increase in fracking as a result of the NDP’s $6-billion giveaway to LNG Canada,” Furstenau said in a statement. “The government’s support for this industry places a greater burden on the rest of our economy to make up the emissions gap.”

The LNG Canada project in Kitimat will use fracked gas from B.C.’s northeast to provide for exports to Asian markets.

Furstenau said that in the first year after the government began implementing the 2018 CleanBC plan emissions continued to rise.

“We need leadership that responds to the climate emergency with immediate action, instead of kicking the can down the road past the next election.”

The Wilderness Committee environmental advocacy group pointed out that the modelling in the government plan includes only the first phase of the LNG Canada project, but not that project’s planned second phase.

Nor does it include emissions from the proposed Woodfibre LNG facility or three other plants that are beginning the environmental assessment process.

Peter McCartney, the Wilderness Committee’s climate campaigner, said the omissions are important.“What happens if and when Shell wants to finish the $40 billion LNG plant it’s building in Kitimat? How does this plan prevent them from doing that.... And if they don’t plan to allow any more LNG facilities — why not just say so?”

Merran Smith, the executive director at Clean Energy Canada, emceed Monday’s announcement as a co-chair of the province’s Climate Solutions Council.

In a statement later in the day she said timely action on the plan is key.

“The roadmap... commits to capping oil and gas emissions and reducing these emissions over time,” she said. “Details regarding how this will be achieved over the next six months will be critical as the sector is responsible for one-fifth of all emissions in the province.”

Karen Tam Wu, a regional director for the Pembina Institute and a member of B.C.’s Climate Solutions Council, said the plan is a move in the right direction and her organization welcomed several of the measures.

“However, a lack of willingness to take a firm stance on the future role of gas will threaten to throw B.C. off course,” she said.

“Most concerning is the plan allows for continued natural gas development in B.C., which is out of line with recommendations from leading international scientific climate and energy bodies,” she said, noting experts say no new oil and gas fields should be developed after this year.

Andrew Gage, a staff lawyer with West Coast Environmental Law, said that while there are positive elements to the plan, it fails to recognize the urgency of climate change.

“Eighty percent of climate change is caused by fossil fuel pollution, but B.C. has once again pushed off any plan to decrease emissions from the province’s oil and gas industry to 2023,” he said. “B.C. has failed to come up with a plan to achieve its 2025 target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 16 per cent, and its plan for the 2030 target has huge holes in it.”

Responding to questions from reporters, Heyman said the plan includes a reduction in emissions from the oil and gas sector of between 33 and 38 per cent.

“That's clearly part of the emission reductions projected in the road map,” he said. “We need to work with Indigenous nations, with the industry, with experts to determine how to do that, and we'll use regulation where necessary, as well as policies and different programs and different forms of emission reduction.”

Heyman said that the most recent figures showing greenhouse gas emissions remained steady in the year following CleanBC’s introduction were to be expected.

“We spent a couple of years implementing, beginning to implement, the policies that are going to ultimately reduce emissions,” he said. “We always knew they wouldn't go down in year one.”

One factor that pushed emissions up was a change in how the federal government accounts for emissions from waste and land use, he said. “That made us have to work harder to develop a credible roadmap to 2030.”

The government expects emissions to plateau for another year and then begin to drop, Heyman said.  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Who Do You Think Will Win the Conservative Leadership Race?

Take this week's poll