Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
News
Coronavirus
Science + Tech

On Booster Shots the Science, and Ethics, Are Split

And more of the latest COVID news from science journals.

Brian Owens 17 Aug 2021TheTyee.ca

Brian Owens is a freelance science writer and editor based in St. Stephen, New Brunswick. His work has appeared in Hakai Magazine, Nature, New Scientist, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Lancet.

Compiled by veteran medical journalist Brian Owens, this roundup of some of the newest science on the COVID-19 pandemic, straight from the scientific journals, is presented by Hakai Magazine in partnership with The Tyee.

Should we be giving a COVID booster shot?

With the more contagious variants of COVID-19 on the rise, scientists are considering whether a third vaccine dose might be a good idea for some people at higher risk of complications.

Researchers in the U.K. looked at people who had received two doses of a vaccine after previously being infected with COVID-19 — the equivalent of getting three doses — and found that they had a stronger antibody response to the variants than those who had only received two vaccine doses. Two other studies, of immunocompromised people on kidney dialysis and of organ transplant recipients, found that while two doses of vaccine provided only weak protection against the virus, a third dose could boost their antibody response.

Science Translational Medicine, Aug. 10, 2021
The Lancet, Aug. 12, 2021
New England Journal of Medicine, Aug. 11, 2021

Two doses might be good enough for most

The idea of offering third doses of the world’s limited supply of vaccines to people in rich countries like Canada while most people in poorer countries are still waiting for their first dose is controversial — most scientists agree that the best way to control the pandemic is to get everyone vaccinated as quickly as possible. And two new studies show that a third dose may not be necessary for most people. While most vaccine studies have focused on antibodies, these two looked at another, complementary, part of the immune system, the T cells. They found that two doses of the vaccines produced a strong T cell response, including against the variants of concern. And importantly, while that response was stronger after a second dose, a third had no effect on T cells.

Nature Communications, Aug. 17, 2021
Immunity, Aug. 12, 2021

Toddlers are more likely to transmit the virus than teens

Younger kids are more likely than teenagers to pass on COVID-19 to caregivers and siblings, according to a large study in Canada. Researchers found that children under the age of three were 1.43 times more likely to pass on the virus to a family member than those aged 14 to 17. Children aged 4 to 8, and 9 to 13, were also more likely to transmit the virus, but not as much as the youngest group.

JAMA Pediatrics, Aug. 16, 2021

Hakai-Tyee partnership logo

Tool to predict mutations could help design new treatments and vaccines

Researchers have developed a tool that allows them to quickly identify common mutations on the SARS-CoV-2 virus that allow it to escape antibodies and infect cells. By growing huge amounts of yeast that have been engineered to display the viral spike protein, the researchers are able to spot which mutations arise most frequently, and which of those are able to evade existing antibody drugs and vaccines. This knowledge will help scientists design new drugs and vaccines in advance, which can be quickly deployed as new variants of the virus emerge.

Cell Reports, Aug. 10, 2021

Targeting the spike protein’s sugar camouflage could help fight variants

One of the ways the SARS-CoV-2 virus tries to hide from our immune system is by cloaking certain parts of its spike protein with a coat of sugar molecules. Now researchers from the University of British Columbia have found a way to turn that defence mechanism into a way to attack the virus. They tested a series of sugar-binding proteins called lectins and found two that bind strongly to those sugar camouflage sites and block the virus from entering cells. Even better, the sites they bind are so important to the virus they almost never mutate, so drugs based on these proteins could be used against all variants of the virus.

The EMBO Journal, August 10, 2021

COVID-19 peaked in the US in December 2020

Rates of COVID-19 hospitalizations, intensive care admissions and deaths in the United States peaked in December 2020, before the vaccines became widely available, according to a large study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The study also found that, between March and December, patient outcomes improved as the use of drugs like remdesivir and corticosteroids increased, while use of ventilators and other intensive interventions decreased, suggesting doctors were learning better ways to deal with the disease as the pandemic went on.

Annals of Internal Medicine, Aug. 10, 2021

Domestic control is more important than travel bans

Taming domestic transmission of COVID-19 should be prioritized over international travel bans aimed at limiting the introduction of the virus from abroad. A study based on the situation in China found that imported cases of COVID-19 have a small effect on a country’s confirmed cases — and that’s only if domestic transmission mitigation mechanisms have kept the virus in check. If domestic cases are out of control, new imported cases have essentially no effect on the country’s infection rate. Measures like social distancing, mask wearing, testing and timely quarantines are more effective than blanket travel restrictions, researchers found.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Aug. 3, 2021  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Are You Concerned about AI?

Take this week's poll