The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Canada needs more independent media. And independent media needs you.

Did you know that most news organizations in Canada are owned by just a handful of companies? And that these companies have been shutting down newsrooms and laying off reporters continually over the past few decades?

Fact-based, credible journalism is essential to our democracy. Unlike many other newsrooms across the country, The Tyee’s independent newsroom is stable and growing.

How are we able to do this? The Tyee Builder program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip into our editorial budget so that we can keep doing what we do best: fact-based, in-depth reporting on issues that matter to our readers. No paywall. No junk. Just good journalism.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to be Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Rights + Justice
Municipal Politics

Vancouver’s Drug Decriminalization Plan Is a Disaster, Say Advocates

The city’s approach was supposed to make drug use safer in a crisis. But those who use drugs say it’s critically flawed.

Jen St. Denis 12 May 2021 |

Jen St. Denis is The Tyee’s Downtown Eastside reporter. Find her on Twitter @JenStDen.

In November, the City of Vancouver forged ahead with a bold plan to become the first Canadian city to decriminalize drugs in a move that could become a template for other cities and provinces.

Mayor Kennedy Stewart said the proposal could be approved by the federal government “within a matter of months.”

Stewart decided to push for decriminalization of drug possession in response to a horrific drug toxicity crisis that killed 1,723 B.C. residents in 2020, the highest number ever recorded in the province. The numbers look even worse for 2021, with double the number of deaths in the first three months of 2021 compared to the first three months of 2020.

Drug policy advocates had been asking for decriminalization as one way to make drug use safer.

But they now say the plan the city has submitted to Health Canada is so faulty that it could make the already toxic drug supply more dangerous and increase the involvement of police in the lives of people who use drugs.

People who use drugs, policy advocates and researchers say the problem is the amount of drugs the city has decided users will be allowed to possess without facing criminal charges. The threshold limits are too low and don’t reflect the daily lived realities of substance users, they say.

It’s apparent the police have had “unchecked decision-making power” over the development of the new model, they warn.

“Thresholds are a ridiculously archaic way of thinking you’re trying to somehow regulate how police interact with people,” said Karen Ward, a drug user, Downtown Eastside resident and advocate.

Ward said the guidelines the city has come up with don’t seem to take into account that much of B.C.’s drug supply is now made up of synthetic substances like fentanyl and benzodiazepines, and that setting a decriminalization threshold too low could lead to even more dangerous synthetic mixes.

“This is an entirely different era, this is not heroin, this is not ‘rock, powder, down’ anymore,” she said. The low thresholds could lead to the production of even more potent and deadly substances.

To implement decriminalization, the city must ask the federal ministers of health and public safety and the attorney general for an exemption to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act’s provisions on possession of drugs for personal use within the city.

The senior city staffers tasked with creating the submission say that setting thresholds is a requirement of Health Canada.

If the submission is approved, police will never be able to charge people with possession if they are carrying an amount of drugs under that limit. If the amount of drugs is over the limit, police will have discretion on whether to charge people with possession or another charge, like possession for the purpose of trafficking.

For several years, the Vancouver Police Department has followed a policy of usually not charging people with possession, although they have continued to seize drugs — including very small amounts — and in some cases have charged people for possession for the purpose of trafficking.

That’s what happened to Samona Marsh, a member of the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users, who served 90 days in jail in 2017 after she was caught with around one gram of crack cocaine.

“The commitment remains with [the police] to not charge people with possession, as much as possible,” said Ted Bruce, a public health consultant who is working with the city on the decriminalization submission.

“We’re going to monitor this to make sure there’s no increase, certainly, in possession charges above the floor.”

Some advocates pin the problem on outdated survey data the city used in developing its submission. It’s from 2018, and the drug supply has changed immensely since then.

But Thomas Kerr, a senior scientist at the BC Centre on Substance Use, said the threshold amounts chosen by the city don’t seem to reflect that data, which is from a long-running survey of injection drug users in Vancouver.

The city has chosen two grams as the threshold for opioids; three grams for cocaine; one gram for crack cocaine; and 1.5 grams for amphetamine.

Kerr said that is far below what the most vulnerable substance user consumes over three days, and the threshold should be set to at least match those users’ consumption.

“If you really want to protect the most at-risk people, you’d go with the maximum value of a three-day supply,” Kerr said.

For opioids, that’s 13.16 grams; 14.25 grams for cocaine; 22.5 grams of crack cocaine; and 19.35 grams of methamphetamine.

582px version of VancouverDrugThresholdChart.jpg
The city’s proposed allowable quantities of drugs are far below the amounts used by many users over three days. Chart by Jen St. Denis.

Kerr wants to know how the city came up with threshold amounts that diverge so wildly from what the data, and current drug users, suggest is needed.

Mary Clare Zak, the managing director of social policy for the City of Vancouver, said the working group was concerned that “possession of amounts that high would pose significant potential harms and risks, especially given the lack of safe supply.”

She said other jurisdictions that have decriminalized possession have included an “administrative mechanism” to “incentivize or require interaction” with health care if people are caught with larger quantities, which Vancouver does not plan to include in its proposal. The “mechanisms” include fines that are waived if people agree to seek health care for substance use.

Safe supply is prescription drugs that are prescribed to people with a substance use disorder as an alternative to tainted street drugs. While the government promised expanded safe supply before the fall election, a slow rollout has meant few programs are operating in B.C.

The Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users has now left a working group the city set up to help with the process.

In an open letter to federal Health Minister Patty Hajdu and decriminalization working groups for the City of Vancouver and B.C. government, a coalition of drug policy advocate groups said drug users were excluded from the process. The letter also says the Vancouver Police Department had too large a role in developing the model.

Bruce, the consultant working with the city, said the police were very much involved in developing the decriminalization model, and that was a requirement of Health Canada.

“They’re still illegal drugs, and the police are still going to be expected to deal with them,” Bruce said. “They’re illegal because they’re considered dangerous substances, and they’re controlled or restricted. So they have an enforcement mandate to deal with these those illegal substances.”

Bruce said there is a concern from the police with setting the threshold limit too high, because that could be used to mask drug dealing.

“I think there is a concern that it may make it easier for people to be able to do sales, with large amounts on them that get kind of under the radar,” Bruce said.

But Scott Bernstein, director of policy for the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition, said unrealistically low thresholds will push people to visit their dealers more often, raising the risk for them as they “have to go engage in a criminalized, illegal market more often.” The low threshold could also give police new reasons to search people and confiscate drugs.

“We’re sort of losing the entire intent of what decriminalization is supposed to do,” he said.

Bruce and the city’s Zak say the decriminalization model can be changed down the road.

But Bernstein said that with other jurisdictions like the B.C. government watching what Vancouver does and potentially using the “Vancouver Model” as a template, it’s important to get it right.

Bernstein said there’s another way the thresholds could have been set.

“You just talk to people, and I think the clientele for decriminalization starts with VANDU.... They’re at risk of being caught and criminalized and punished, and you can ask them about their actual consumption patterns are like, what they’re using, how much.

“That should have been the approach from day one.”  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context


The Barometer

Are You Concerned about Rising Support for Canada’s Far-Right Parties?

Take this week's poll