The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Canada needs more independent media. And independent media needs you.

Did you know that most news organizations in Canada are owned by just a handful of companies? And that these companies have been shutting down newsrooms and laying off reporters continually over the past few decades?

Fact-based, credible journalism is essential to our democracy. Unlike many other newsrooms across the country, The Tyee’s independent newsroom is stable and growing.

How are we able to do this? The Tyee Builder program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip into our editorial budget so that we can keep doing what we do best: fact-based, in-depth reporting on issues that matter to our readers. No paywall. No junk. Just good journalism.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to be Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
News
  |  
Rights + Justice
  |  
Politics
  |  
Science + Tech

Facial Recognition Software Has Been Used by 48 Agencies in Canada

Privacy commissioners find Clearview AI broke laws, plea for more powers against illegal surveillance.

Bryan Carney 3 Feb 2021 | TheTyee.ca

Bryan Carney reports on privacy, technology and freedom of information and is Director of Web Production at The Tyee. You can follow his very occasional tweets at @bpcarney.

Controversial facial recognition firm Clearview AI broke Canadian laws and had at least 48 accounts in agencies across the country, most of them police forces, federal and provincial privacy commissioners said today.

And legislation — including proposed reforms — will not be adequate to deter similar privacy-harming software in the future, they said in a telephone press conference to discuss the release of their report.

The privacy watchdogs found Clearview AI's technology enabled mass surveillance of Canadians and violated their rights.

The 48 agencies using the software were not named in the report or the media conference held this morning. However, police forces across the country have publicly admitted to using the software. They made the admission after hackers obtained Clearview AI’s client list and leaked it to BuzzFeed News.

The RCMP and Vancouver Police Department each have used the software on at least one occasion, media reports including those by The Tyee have reported. The RCMP has only named one of the four units that used the software.

Clearview AI’s collection of billions of images including those of Canadians was a “clear violation” of privacy rights in Canada, agreed federal, B.C., Quebec and Alberta privacy commissioners in a report.

It is not clear how the joint condemnation might translate into changed or new laws. In a joint press conference held this morning by the provincial and federal commissioners, federal privacy commissioner Daniel Therrien highlighted that his Office of the Privacy Commissioner lacks the ability to either issue orders or impose fines in these circumstances.

B.C.’s information and privacy commissioner Michael McEvoy echoed Therrien’s call for stronger laws.

“It’s clear that we need stronger enforcement measures to ensure that companies realize it’s going to be cheaper to invest in the privacy and security of their clients up front rather than face the consequences if they don’t,” said McEvoy.

The federal government is reviewing its privacy laws and new legislation. Bill C-11, which would enact the Consumer Privacy Protection Act and the Personal Information and Data Protection Tribunal Act is being debated in Parliament. The bill may end up giving the privacy commissioner the ability to issue orders to government agencies including police and impose fines, says Therrien.

But he says it is already clear that proposed legislation will lack sharp teeth. “Sadly, the violations of privacy law that we found in relation to Clearview would not lead to financial penalties according to C-11,” said Therrien.

Therrien will be pressing for more powers to issue fines with parliamentarians when discussing C-11, he said.

The Tyee obtained the internal requisition forms and an invoice to the RCMP from Clearview dated Oct. 24, 2019, after the force had denied it used facial recognition.

Alberta’s privacy commissioner stated the office first investigated facial recognition technology use over 15 years ago, related to issuing of driver’s licenses in the province.

In B.C, the technology is known to date back even further. The Tyee revealed that the B.C. RCMP has been using the “Computerized Arrest and Booking System,” which stores and compares faces of charged persons to create photo lineups, since 2002.

“Currently, it is only being used by the RCMP in B.C.,” an RCMP spokesperson told the Tyee last year.

In B.C. no force “officially took on the technology,” said McEvoy of Clearview AI during today’s press conference, but individual officers — including from the VPD on at least one occasion — took upon themselves to use the software. The use has since been discontinued, said McEvoy.

Both federal and provincial jurisdictions have existing frameworks designed to ensure privacy impacts are assessed by commissioners before new technologies are implemented by government agencies.

But Tyee reporting has found that forces including the RCMP evade the legislation by claiming the software programs are being trialled or not fully implemented, all while using them in active operations on Canadian citizens.

“This is a damning report. It is not a surprising one,” said a written statement sent to The Tyee by BC Freedom of Information and Privacy Association executive director Jason Woywada and president Mike Larsen. “Time and again we see organizations are trying to get away with it until they can’t.”

Larsen and Woywada echoed the need to strengthen legislation including C-11.

“Our privacy laws need teeth, but the currently proposed legislation [of] C-11 provides no guarantee and needs to be amended to improve protection.”

The worst of C-11’s current flaws, say Larsen and Woywada, are that C-11 creates a politically appointed tribunal which could both override and dilute the powers of the commissioner, whose role is intended to be free from political influence.

“These types of tribunals tend to side with corporate rather than citizen interests,” said Larsen and Woywada.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities

Do:

  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

What Issue Is Most Important to You This Election?

Take this week's poll