journalism that swims
against the current.
Rights + Justice
BC Politics

Independent Reviewer to Probe Legislature Spending Allegations

‘We would like to get this done as quickly as possible,’ says NDP house leader.

Andrew MacLeod 22 Feb

Andrew MacLeod is The Tyee’s Legislative Bureau Chief in Victoria and the author of All Together Healthy (Douglas & McIntyre, 2018). Find him on Twitter or reach him at

A British Columbia legislature committee will ask an independent reviewer to consider allegations from Speaker Darryl Plecas of misconduct by two suspended top officials, as well as their responses, and then recommend what should happen next.

“We have outlined a path forward that will allow us to deal with the recommendations in the Speaker’s report,” said NDP house leader Mike Farnworth, flanked in a media scrum by BC Liberal house leader Mary Polak and Green house leader Sonia Furstenau.

In November, members of the legislative assembly voted unanimously to suspend with pay Clerk Craig James, the top staff person in the $80-million-a-year legislature, and Gary Lenz, who as sergeant-at-arms is the head of security.

The RCMP confirmed at the time that it was investigating. Two special prosecutors were appointed to oversee the investigation and recommend whether charges would be appropriate.

MLAs will also have to decide whether James and Lenz can return to work, should remain on paid leave, or be fired.

A lengthy report by Speaker Plecas released Jan. 21 included allegations about alcohol removed from the legislature, excessive travel spending and inappropriate expense claims.

James and Lenz have rejected nearly every allegation Plecas made in his report, and said they believe they’ve done nothing wrong and want to return to work.

Response to the responses

Plecas, in turn, has written a 32-page response to James and Lenz’s responses to his initial report. That response was released Thursday afternoon.

“At this stage, the House Leaders need to decide whether confidence in these two officers has been undermined to the point that, regardless of the outcome of the further processes, audits and investigations, Mr. James and Mr. Lenz cannot realistically return to their positions as the senior executives of the Legislative Assembly,” Plecas wrote.

“The responses from Mr. James and Mr. Lenz attempt to create a contest of evidence between me and them, but that is not what this is about,” he said, saying his observations were supported by dozens of witnesses who worked with James and Lenz.

“The responses provided by the suspended officers can be assessed without having to decide whether to believe them or me,” he said. “Considering Mr. James’ and Mr. Lenz’s own statements in light of the objective documents, and using basic common sense, should provide a sufficient basis on which to make a determination of whether the Legislative Assembly and the public can ever have full confidence in these officers’ ability to lead this institution in the future.”

James and Lenz are highly paid senior officers and their conduct needs to be scrupulous, Plecas said. “The standard we expect of senior executives can’t be that their actions be ‘plausibly defensible’ or ‘...but somebody else okayed it.’ It has to be that they do what’s right.”

Path forward

The three house leaders are to meet and develop the terms of the review and will invite an “eminent jurist” such as a retired Supreme Court judge to conduct it. “We are going to meet as quickly as possible, and we would like to get this done as quickly as possible,” Farnworth said.

“I think all three of us, all three parties around that table, take this issue very seriously,” he said, adding that they had to come together on the issue. “We take the institution very seriously and we worked together to come up with a way forward, along with the Speaker, and we think that we’ve got the right approach and the right path.”

Plecas, whose credibility was at times publicly questioned in media stories and by opposition MLAs including BC Liberal leader Andrew Wilkinson, said he was pleased with the committee’s decision.

“I think we have a path forward,” he said. “I’m extremely happy of the decision to have a jurist do an independent review. I’m assuming that’s going to be a rather quick path, and we’ll have to see where it all lands.”

He said he expected the process would take a matter of weeks.

The committee noted Plecas would be uninvolved in the review or further discussion of the matter, and Plecas said it was time for him to step back.

“The police will do their thing, that will of course be independent of any observations that I’ve made,” he said. “We will have the auditor general who will make a review, which is independent of anything I say. We will have a work review process, which will be independent of what I say.”

Arguably, he said, the facts are independent as well.

“All of that leaves me very confident where this will end,” he said. “I don’t think there’s any debate or should be any questions about my thinking on this. I said very early on of course that I believe the two people who are under investigation shouldn’t be here.”

He added, “That person who does the review will come to a conclusion which is in the best interest of British Columbians and British Columbia taxpayers. I’m very confident about that.”

The committee also voted to rescind a previous motion to appoint an independent auditor, and to instead support B.C. Auditor General Carol Bellringer’s continued involvement.  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context


The Barometer

Do You Think Free Contraception Should Be Available Across Canada?

Take this week's poll