Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.

NDP Leadership Candidates Grapple with Strategic Voting

United Steelworkers debate confronts candidates with tough issues.

Jeremy Nuttall 23 Jun

Jeremy J. Nuttall is The Tyee’s reader-funded Parliament Hill reporter in Ottawa. Find his previous stories here.

Unabashedly progressive policies and a shift to proportional representation are keys to keeping the federal New Democrats from being abandoned by strategic voters, party leadership candidates said Thursday in a Toronto debate.

The debate, hosted by the United Steelworkers Union, featured questions on protecting pensions, the future for resource workers and retirement incomes — and strategic voting.

The NDP’s slump in the 2015 election, when it went from leading in pre-election polls to winning just 44 seats, has been blamed on voters who supported party policies but decided that voting for Justin Trudeau’s Liberals was the best way to oust Stephen Harper.

Manitoba MP Niki Ashton said the party must stop making mistakes like allowing the Liberals to “out left” the New Democrats during election campaigns and “wandering away” from the party’s principles.

“We need to learn from those lessons and we need to do things differently,” Ashton said. “We need a bold agenda to stand up for working people, to stand up for people on the margins.”

Ashton said the party’s core message should be that anyone who considers themselves progressive should vote for the NDP.

New Westminster-Burnaby MP Peter Julian echoed her sentiments, saying the party needs to present bold visions and policies on issues like the environment and electoral reform.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau promised electoral reform during the campaign, saying the 2015 election would be the last one based on the current first-past-the-post system. But he reneged on the commitment this year.

Julian said that the NDP needs to continue to push for proportional representation, which would eliminate the need for strategic voting.

Quebec MP Guy Caron and Ontario MPP Jagmeet Singh clashed over retirement income.

Singh, a late entrant to the race who is now considered a front-runner, has called for an end to universal old age pensions. He proposes merging retirement and seniors’ benefits into one program with payments going to those with the lowest incomes.

Caron went on the attack.

“The way I see it is that it will open up the door for the stigmatization of low-income seniors,” Caron said. “It’s a Conservative idea, why are you trying to dress up a Conservative idea in a progressive clothing?”

Singh defended his position, saying his plan will help lift people out of poverty and eliminate tax breaks for those who don’t need them.

Another question raised the critical issue of the NDP’s approach to balancing environmental protection and climate policy against the importance of jobs for unionized workers in the resource sector.

Timmins-James Bay MP Charlie Angus criticized the federal government for not investing in retraining workers when resource economies slump, like the Alberta oil and gas industry since prices collapsed in 2014.

“In the time of a bust that’s when you put the re-investment in,” Angus said.

Trade and protectionism also emerged as a debate issue. The five leadership hopefuls were asked if the federal government should implement a “buy Canadian” policy, giving preference to businesses in this country.

“Yes we should, and we should start with Canadian steel,” said Singh. “We can start with steel, we can look at other industries like forestry, there are a number of areas we can look at.”

All the candidates agreed that pension rules need to be changed to protect employees when close or lay off workers.

Caron said pensioners need to make the first people on the list of creditors when a company files for bankruptcy.

The NDP will select a leader to replace Tom Mulcair in October, through mail and online voting.  [Tyee]

Read more: Politics

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context


The Barometer

Would You Live in a Former Office Building?

Take this week's poll