The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Clark Cleared, Critics Want Answers from Speaker on Possible Report Leak

Premier's comms director tipped off on conflict decision, Eby says.

By Bob Mackin 5 May 2016 |

North Vancouver-based journalist Bob Mackin has reported for local, regional, national and international media outlets since he began as a journalist in 1990.

image atom
NDP MLA David Eby said he would accept conflict commissioner's ruling on his complaint, but added it's further evidence of a broken system. Photo: Twitter.

NDP MLA David Eby is demanding answers from Speaker Linda Reid over the apparent leak of the conflict of interest commissioner's report that found nothing wrong with Premier Christy Clark's high-priced fundraisers.

Conflict of Interest Commissioner Paul Fraser ruled Wednesday that Clark was not in a conflict of interest because "helping to boost the BC Liberal Party's financial wellbeing is a political benefit, rather than a private financial one."

Eby and Democracy Watch co-founder Duff Conacher had filed separate complaints about Clark's role in Liberal fundraisers where donors paid up to $20,000 for access to the premier at dinners or other events.

Fraser's report was tabled in the legislature just before 7 p.m. on Wednesday.

In a letter to Reid, Eby said Clark's communications director Ben Chin had indicated to members of the Press Gallery that he had advance notice of when the report would be tabled and what it contained.

"He was allegedly encouraging these journalists to 'watch Hansard' because it 'was going to be good,'" Eby wrote. "It is unlikely in the extreme that the premier's professional head of 'issues management' would encourage journalists to obtain copies of the report without first obtaining a copy himself to review and prepare for any issues that arise. It is unlikely further still that he would allegedly describe a report he had not read as 'good.'"

Eby wrote that he didn't expect the report for at least a week because he had provided an extensive submission to Fraser at 2 p.m. Tuesday.

Eby said when he heard about Chin's comments to journalists he raised the issue with Fraser.

"I wrote to the commissioner at 6 o'clock saying I've heard that the Liberals know that this thing is going to be tabled today, how did they know that?" Eby told The Tyee. "That's why I believe the issue is with the Speaker's office, not with the commissioner. The commissioner wrote back saying no, I delivered that straight to the Speaker's office and nobody else knew."

Reid did not respond for comment, but, on Friday, Chin said via email: "I only learned about the timing from journalists. I shared that with other journalists." He declined to name the reporters.*

Eby said B.C. law requires reports from statutory officers like the conflict commissioner and auditor general to be tabled in the legislature. That usually happens after Question Period, not at the end of the day.

On Tuesday, Reid accused Representative for Children and Youth Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond of contempt of parliament for releasing a report before it was tabled in the legislature.

Turpel-Lafond fired back that she took the action after the Speaker's office told her there was no time available on April 28 to table the report. Turpel-Lafond also said someone in the Speaker's office immediately leaked the information that the report was completed to Ministry of Children and Family Development.

More than three hours after the conflict report had been tabled, Conacher had not received a copy and it was not available on the commissioner's website.

Considering bid for judicial review

Conacher said Thursday that he may ask a judge to overturn Fraser's decision.

"The commissioner himself suffered from an apparent conflict of interest and so he should not have ruled on this situation involving Premier Clark and instead should have referred the complaints to someone else," Conacher said.

Fraser's son is John Paul Fraser, who is deputy minister of government communications and public engagement. He is a long-time friend of Clark and volunteered on her leadership campaign.

In 2012, Paul Fraser recused himself from investigating former Liberal MLA John van Dongen's complaint about Clark's possible conflict in the BC Rail privatization. Van Dongen had raised concerns that Fraser was in conflict. (Clark was cleared.)

Conacher said Fraser's ruling is disappointing, but not surprising. Even without Clark's $50,000-a-year stipend from the BC Liberals, Conacher said, donations at an exclusive event should be illegal. The controversial stipend "just made the personal benefit for the premier even more direct."

"Despite the commissioner's dangerously flawed ruling, British Columbians will recognize that it is deeply unethical for politicians to sell access to themselves to wealthy private interests, and that this fundraising has a corrupting influence on B.C. politicians and political parties," he said.

"Hopefully Premier Clark will wake up to this reality sooner than later, and voters across the province will contact their MLA and call for key changes to make B.C. politics more democratic by strictly limiting donations so wealthy interests can't use money as an undemocratic and unethical way of influencing provincial politicians, and also municipal politicians."

Deputy Premier Rich Coleman defended Fraser and his ruling and called on critics to accept the decision.

"Everybody could take their shots while this complaint was going on, and pre-judging what this commissioner might do," Coleman told reporters. "He has ruled. It's time these guys accepted the law as it's written and the decision of a commissioner with this much integrity and professionalism."

Clark appeared unconcerned by the controversy during a Thursday afternoon news conference in Vancouver before the Western Premiers' Conference.

"I was always thinking that the conflict commissioner would rule against the NDP in this; I never thought they had much of a case," she said.

"A conflict arises when there is an obvious connection between the decision the government has made and money the government has received. That's right, that's what the system is there to protect us against. I don't think anybody has made any allegations that that's happened under my watch."

Eby said he would accept Fraser's ruling, but it is further evidence of a broken system in B.C., one of few provinces with no laws to limit fundraising.

"The idea that it's legal for the premier to sit down for a dinner with someone who paid $20,000 for the privilege and then walk into the cabinet office and make a decision on that person's interests is astounding to me," Eby said. "It's going to be a live issue right up until the election."

The election is scheduled for May 9, 2017.

With files from Andrew MacLeod.

*Story updated May 6 at 10:30 a.m.  [Tyee]

Read more: Politics, BC Politics

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: Are You Preparing for the Next Climate Disaster?

Take this week's poll