The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Controversial FSA Tests: How Are Results Used?

Critics wonder why data from the exams aren't better employed to improve schooling.

By Katie Hyslop 1 Feb 2013 |

Katie Hyslop reports on education and youth issues for The Tyee Solutions Society. Follow her on Twitter.

image atom
Why have kids take tests if results aren’t linked to action? ask critics.

For almost three weeks now, Grades 4 and 7 students across B.C. have been completing the annual Foundational Skills Assessments measuring their reading, writing, and numeracy comprehension. At the same time, the teachers' union and government have been squaring off over the usefulness of such an exercise.

The BC Teachers' Federation (BCTF) takes umbrage with the time assessment takes away from classroom instruction time. They say there is no need for every student to take a standardized test to prove students are learning the curriculum, when testing a representative sample of students would do.

The B.C. government says the test is key to understanding if the province's children are learning the curriculum, and it helps parents know where their child stands compared to their peers. The results can help pinpoint areas where instruction is strong, and where it can be improved.

"FSA assists parents, teachers and school districts in providing help for the students who need it most and it also allows the ministry and districts to spot trends and correct what needs to be corrected," said Education Minister Don McRae in an op-ed in the Vancouver Sun published in mid-January.

What McRae's op-ed doesn't cover, however, is how the FSAs are used to improve education outcomes for B.C. students. Once the results come back, what happens?

Most use the tests to complete their district achievement contracts each summer, detailing what needs to change to improve learning and how they will do it. The following January a superintendent's report updates the ministry on the progress they've made. But how accountable are the school districts held to reaching these goals and improving on their FSA scores? Not accountable enough according to Victor Froese, a former school trustee and member of the FSA design committee.

"They're supposed to set goals," Froese told The Tyee. "The criticism I have is that they really do not act on those: [achievement contracts are] filed, and that's the end. There's no direct link to anything in the system."

'Nothing has changed': Froese

In 2007 Froese, who in recent years has served as an external reviewer on the technical review team for the reading and writing section of the FSAs, wrote an email to Vancouver Sun reporter Janet Steffenhagen claiming the FSAs, achievement reports, individual school plans, and the ministry's district reviews weren't effectively used to improve student outcomes.

"If districts were strongly encouraged to implement the recommendations in the district review reports alone we could expect fairly radical changes," he told Steffenhagen.

"Do we know if any of these things are being done? I would urge the ministry to practice what it preaches."

He said districts were putting actions in their achievement reports that would have helped increase student learning, but not implementing them. He wrote a similar letter to the Vancouver Sun the year before, which you can read at the bottom of this article, talking about what districts with low FSA reading scores needed to do to improve:

Seven years later, his criticisms still stand. He says if you look at the provincial FSA statistics on the government's website "they have little line graphs at the bottom for the last five years, from 2008 to 2012, and all of them are straight lines, which means that nothing has changed."

The statistics show for all Grade 4 and 7 students who took the tests last year -- and about 17 per cent of them didn't -- 70 per cent met or exceeded expectations in reading, 72 per cent met or exceeded expectations in writing, and 68 per cent met or exceeded expectations in numeracy. Froese says its concerning the average FSA score has remained the same for four years, despite four sets of district achievement contracts being filed.

Froese says not only are FSA results used in achievement contracts to create goals that districts aren't held accountable for reaching, the goals often don't make sense, either.

"Typically what they would say is, 'We'll do two per cent better in this,' and that's the criticism I made is that it actually doesn't tell you anything about what will be or should be changed when you talk about percentages, because those are outcome measures and not the outcome," he said.

"The outcome would be that students could read at a higher level or do more complicated arithmetic."

Districts 'cherry pick' data: Ehrcke

Tara Ehrcke, Greater Victoria Teachers' Association president, isn't shy about saying she doesn't like the FSAs, period. But she doesn't like the way districts are reporting the results of these tests, either.

In a post on her blog last week, Ehrcke accused both the Delta and Greater Victoria school districts of cherry-picking assessment data for achievement contracts and superintendent reports to show only where marks were improving.

"I think the point of that particular article was to point out the hypocrisy in what McRae said with regards to 'We must test every student because that will be used for planning,' and then in the achievement reports, [districts are] really cherry-picking data," she told The Tyee.

"But there's no rational connection between the data and what the plans [for improvement] are."

The Ministry of Education doesn't require districts to do anything with their FSA data, but suggest they make use of them to set educational outcome goals.

"Superintendents of Achievement from the ministry meet with school district leaders to discuss FSA results and ways to make improvements. The ministry uses FSA data as one piece of information to review curriculum and the elementary program, and to assist in setting goals and targets," reads an emailed statement the ministry sent to The Tyee.

The statement adds that "many districts" use the FSA, in addition to other data, as information to set goals in their achievement contracts.

FSA just one indicator

The Tyee spoke with two districts, Arrow Lakes and Coast Mountains, whose 2012 FSA results were below the provincial average. They both confirmed use of the FSAs in their achievement contracts, as well as other district and school tests like District Assessment of Reading and the Whole Class Reading Assessment.

"School districts sign achievement contracts with the ministry, and then we submit a report on that contract. So we use the FSA results to inform us in those areas in regard to how the kids are doing," said Nancy Wells, superintendent of the Coast Mountains district.

"Nothing that you measure in education, if you just use one indicator, is very wise. You've got to use a broad range of indicators."

Terry Taylor, district principal of learning for Arrow Lakes, says the ministry doesn't punish districts with low FSA results, but rather treats the improvement process as a conversation.

"In our district we've always provided data and evidence about what we're working on, and what progress we're making or what progress we're not making, and we're in charge of identifying our own goals and needs," said Taylor.

"What we get from the ministry, particularly the superintendent of achievement that's assigned to our particular district, is we get support. It's not a top-down directive way of working. The ideal is that it's a learning community, and certainly that's my experience."

In the Arrow Lakes district individual school planning councils also take a look at the data to set improvement goals for each school.

"It informs our teaching practice and it informs what support we might be able to give parents and student teachers in moving learning forward. The agenda is moving learning forward, and it's just a part of what helps us know whether what we're doing is making a difference or not," said Taylor.

But Froese says there's very little evidence that assessment data, whether its FSAs or other standardized tests, is used to improve districts' educational outcomes.

"There's no direct link [from assessments] to anything in the system," he said. "The only thing that I can find or see now is they do a kind of early childhood assessment, and that's done by teachers and that's used to supply some funding to districts where there are a lot of needy kids. That's useful."  [Tyee]

Read more: Politics, Education

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities


  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll