Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
News

NDP Turnout Surges in Advance Poll

In four ridings, New Democrats appear motivated.

Russ Francis 17 May 2005TheTyee.ca
image atom

A record number of voters turned out for the advance polls held over four days last week.

Elections B.C. reports that 204,651 voters cast their ballots during May 11 – 14. That’s an 87 per cent increase over the 2001 advance poll. While there are now nearly 700,000 more British Columbians registered to vote than there were four years ago, that amounts to just a one-third increase in the register of voters.

In other words, the boost in this year’s advance poll turnout appears to be mostly the result of greater voter interest in the election.

But who were the advance voters? Was it the business community getting out its troops, terrified of an NDP victory? Or were previously lackadaisical New Democrats sensing that they might actually have a chance of forming the government?

An analysis by The Tyee of voter turnout for the advance polls in four key ridings suggests it’s a bit of both, but with New Democrats significantly more motivated.

The Tyee examined advance voting for 2001 and 2005 in two safe Liberal seats--Vancouver-Quilchena and Vancouver-Langara—and in two safe NDP seats, Vancouver-Mt. Pleasant and Vancouver-Hastings.

NDP voters motivated

In both elections, advance turnout was considerably higher in the two Liberal ridings, perhaps because their residents are more likely to have flexible work hours.

However, the increase in advance turnout was somewhat larger in the two NDP seats, suggesting that NDP voters are more motivated for this election than Liberals.

In Vancouver-Quilchena, precisely double the number of voters cast advance ballots in 2005 than did four years ago. For Vancouver-Langara, the increase was 92 per cent.

However, the jump was even bigger for the two NDP ridings.

The advance poll voters increased by 113 per cent in Vancouver-Mt. Pleasant and by a huge 175 per cent in Vancouver-Hastings.

In summary, to judge by the comparisons of these four ridings, New Democrats appear to be showing significantly more interest in this election than Liberals.

Another way to look at the changes is through the percentage of registered voters in each riding taking part in the advance poll.

In 2001, 5.4 per cent of Vancouver-Quilchena registered voters took part in the advance poll, growing to 8.6 per cent in 2005. Advance turnout in Vancouver-Langara jumped from 4.4 percent four years ago to 6.1 per cent in 2005.

For the NDP’s Vancouver-Mt. Pleasant, advance turnout increased from 4.2 per cent in 2001 to 6.2 per cent this month. For Vancouver-Hastings, the increase was from 2.4 per cent to 4.9 per cent.

More motivated

One longtime political analyst, who has worked for a number of B.C. governments, says the Tyee figures suggest that both sides are now more motivated to vote than four years ago.

“That’s significant,” said the analyst, who asked that his name not be used. “It suggests a lot of close races.” But given the much larger increase in advance polls in the NDP ridings, it also suggests that New Democrats are notably more motivated than Liberals.

Given that even premier Gordon Campbell is emphasizing the importance of voter turnout, the NDP has reason for optimism in the advance voter turnout.

Russ Francis is a veteran political reporter based in Victoria.  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Are You Concerned about AI?

Take this week's poll