Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.

Schlock Proof Your Child

Three ways to help kids build critical minds, their best defence against bad media.

Ozlem Sensoy 30 Jun

Özlem Sensoy is a professor in the Faculty of Education at Simon Fraser University. She is co-editor of the book Rethinking Popular Culture and Media.

This week marks the start of summer vacation for most kids. For many, that means a serious season of television watching.

The average home has more television sets than people, more than 85 per cent of B.C. teens have two or more screens in their bedrooms, and over the course of a year kids spend many more hours with media than in school with teachers.

Not only is media pervasive in kids' lives, but it is increasingly organized around the values of consumption, racism, misogyny, and violence. If you haven't played video games since Pac-Man or Donkey Kong, you'll just have to take my word for it that the landscape of kids' games looks quite different today than it did back then.

All this suggests that adults must work harder to strengthen kids' resistance to the worst in corporate media and pop culture.

But what's the best way?

Is it realistic to unplug kids from most media, and only allow them to see what adults deem "good"?

Adults wanting to protect kids from "bad media" are engaging in what scholars of media literacy call a "protectionist approach." While efforts to try to steer kids towards "good" or "educational" media (such as the Sesame Street) are noble, many parents don't have the time nor resources to investigate and protect their children from the volume and intensity of corporate produced pop culture and media.

But there are more realistic, positive steps parents can take.

Research shows that kids engage with media in all sorts of ways that thwart media-creators' goals. For example, we know that kids as young as age three can learn simple media literacy strategies. Such skills serve kids in the immediate as a defence against any and every form of pop-slop that Corporate Inc. is selling, and in the long term develop critical thinking skills about media messages in general.

This means that programs, games, toys, and videos don't need to be "educational" to be educational. You can help kids to develop these critical thinking skills. Here are some strategies:

Turn kids into data detectives. A simple frequency or event count to draw kids' attention to what's there (and what's not there). For example, while watching any show, have kids keep track of variables such as: how many product placements or logos can you spot within the show (exclude commercials)? How many male versus female characters are there? How many people of colour? White people? How is work represented? Which characters have which jobs? Count the number of times characters yell and hit, or collaborate and comfort each other.

Have kids track 'transmedia intertextuality.' This is a fancy academic term that describes all the ways in which marketers "connect" a movie, show, or character (for example Green Lantern) to products outside of the show such as toys, video games, t-shirts, shoelaces, backpacks, sheets, even granola bars and deodorant. It's a powerful tool when young people begin to notice all the ways in which various media vehicles (songs, ring tones, films, toys) are interconnected.

Identify cases of 'age compression.' This marketing term describes the strategy of pushing adult products onto younger consumers. For example, make-up or sexy lingerie marketed to girls at younger and younger ages. It may be useful to ask questions such as, who benefits from the idea that pre-pubescent girls need (or want) padded bras, eyeliner, lip glosses, or perfume? What is squeezed out (play, collaboration, community) when young people are pushed into playing out the scripts of the adult world (work, competition, independence)?

Some might argue that this is making too much of toys, games, and movies. This is all just entertainment and it's ridiculous to make so much of it. But who benefits from such a perspective -- those who are selling that entertainment? Or those who are paying for it?

The point here is that kids don't necessarily need to be protected in order to resist corporate popular culture and media messages or incursions into their childhood. And that developing the skills to do so has long-term positive effects on their critical thinking skills.

Children and youth are not naïve, agent-less, or disengaged. The summer media and pop culture landscape is a perfect time for them to practice and show just how capable they can be.  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context


The Barometer

Would You Live in a Former Office Building?

Take this week's poll