The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Mediacheck

A Digital Strategy for Whom? Industry or Society?

Ottawa wants your vision for Canada's digital future. Is it just about business?

By Steve Anderson and Reilly Yeo 7 Jul 2010 | TheTyee.ca

Steve Anderson is the national coordinator for OpenMedia.ca He is a contributing author of Censored 2008 and Battleground: The Media and has written for The Tyee, Toronto Star, Epoch Times, Common Ground, Rabble.ca and Adbusters. Reach him at: steve@democraticmedia.ca, http://facebooksteve.com, http://steveontwitter.com, and http://medialinkscolumn.com.

Media Links is a syndicated column supported by CommonGround, TheTyee, Rabble.ca, and VUE Weekly. Media Links by Steve Anderson, Common Ground, Rabble.ca, TheTyee, The Vancouver Observer, VUE Weekly is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License. You must attribute this work to Steve Anderson, Common Ground, Rabble.ca, TheTyee, Vancouver Observer, VUE Weekly (with link).

image atom
The feds are looking for the wrong piece.

You probably haven't heard about it, but as you read this, the government is in the final days of its effort to gather input from Canadians about the country's digital future. On May 10, at a major conference with tiered levels of access to leaders in industry and government, Industry Minister Tony Clement announced a 60-day consultation on a digital economy strategy.

The consultation will run until July 9, and will inform government policy around key issues such as media ownership, Internet openness, broadband access, cell phone rates and competition, support for digital media production and much more. Clement's choice to announce the consultation at an industry conference seems appropriate considering what key documents reveal about its intended audience.

What about society?

To frame and inform the consultation, the government produced a consultation paper "Improving Canada's Digital Advantage" that outlines key issues. The paper is narrowly framed in the language of efficiency and competition; the emphasis is on "maximizing reliance on market forces" through protection of the "legitimate interests" of Internet service providers and other industry players. According to the government's website, "it is business that must lead the charge and execute the game plan." No document speaks so clearly to the government's approach to digital policy: the marketplace and industry come first.

This also sheds light on why the government only began this consultation after getting its marching orders from a series of closed-door meetings with industry groups. It appears the government believes the interests of big business are synonymous with what's best for Canada. The choice to focus on a "digital economy" strategy rather than a digital society strategy speaks volumes. Does digital policy not have social or cultural implications?

Narrowing the public

Looking at the questions being asked by the consultation brings its intended audience into sharp focus: "What would a successful digital strategy look like for your firm of sector?"; "What would best position Canada as a destination of choice for venture capital and investments in global R&D and product mandates?" These are not questions targeted to the average Canadian. The government's approach to this consultation fails to tap into a wealth of Canadian passion, aspiration and ingenuity.

More of the same

We've been here before. In 2005 a Telecommunications Policy Review Panel (TPRP) was appointed to make recommendations on some of the same digital policies currently under consideration. The TPRP public consultation process was clearly more inviting to industry groups than citizens: content analysis of the TPRP's submissions reveals that Aboriginal, consumer, women's and community groups represented only 15.5 per cent of total submissions, while industry groups accounted for 60.1 per cent.

The TPRP's recommendations, which fall in line with the government's current framework, are at least party responsible for Canada falling behind other OECD countries in terms of Internet access, speed, cost and openness. When the government declares it is "improving our digital advantage," we should be asking, “What advantage?” We can't let industry-centric policies continue to slow down the pace of both economic and social innovation.

The policy being developed right now will change Canada forever. The government's approach, which allows for minimal public involvement in this short consultation process, demonstrates the urgent need for a citizen-centred initiative to counter the government's industry-framed consultation.  [Tyee]

Read more: Science + Tech

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll