The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Canada needs more independent media. And independent media needs you.

Did you know that most news organizations in Canada are owned by just a handful of companies? And that these companies have been shutting down newsrooms and laying off reporters continually over the past few decades?

Fact-based, credible journalism is essential to our democracy. Unlike many other newsrooms across the country, The Tyee’s independent newsroom is stable and growing.

How are we able to do this? The Tyee Builder program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip into our editorial budget so that we can keep doing what we do best: fact-based, in-depth reporting on issues that matter to our readers. No paywall. No junk. Just good journalism.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to be Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.
Photo Essay

Getting Rid of the Box

Recording images of flowers on a flatbed scanner recalls photography's early experiments

By Alex Waterhouse-Hayward 23 Jun 2004 | TheTyee.ca
image atom

"The most transitory of things, a shadow, the proverbial emblem of all that is fleeting and momentary, may be fettered by the spells of our 'natural magic,' and may be fixed forever in the position which it seemed only destined for a single instant to occupy."

-- W.H. F. Talbot, Some Account of the Art of Photogenic Drawings,1839

On June 18, 2002 I placed two blooms from my garden of the Bourbon rose, Rosa 'La Reine Victoria', on my Epson Perfection1640SU flatbed scanner. I then scanned them at 1600 dpi, 100-percent size.

The result stunned me.

I could only think of English photographer William Henry Fox Talbot's photogenic drawings of the 1830s. While the image on my monitor was beautiful, there was a crispness and precision that reminded me of early photography's hope that here was a medium that was all reality with none of the abstractions of painting. Those pioneer photographers thought that photography, through the interaction of sunlight on light-sensitive silver salts, might capture the Platonic essence of things.

La Reine Victoria lay on my scanner because I had vowed 15 years ago not to ever photograph roses. My wife Rosemary had dragged me to a meeting of the Vancouver Rose Society. As I sat on a hard chair watching countless bad close-up slides of roses I understood the truth behind those cartoons making fun of people forced to see a bad slide show. This was my worst nightmare.

A promise on roses

As excruciating as it all was, I became hooked on roses, especially old roses with scent. Today I grow more than 70 roses and I am a card-carrying rosarian. But my enthusiasm for roses does not extend to taking pictures of them. I wouldn't want to impose pain on anyone with a rose slide show.

While the digital camera is a technological marvel, it is not too different from film cameras or even Leonardo's camera obscura. All are made up of three parts: the lens in the front; the box in the middle; and the film, the CCDs (charged coupled device), or the tracing paper (in Leonardo's case) at the back.

Fox Talbot's photogenic drawings circumvented this three-part system. He placed plants from his garden on to sensitized paper, which was then exposed to sunlight. These photograms (their modern name) had a directness that emphasized the intimate contact between plant and paper. His Pencil of Nature, published from 1844-'46 in six fascicles, was the first commercially produced book illustrated with photographs. The photogram has one important limitation. If the plant is not transparent, little detail besides its outline and shape can be observed. Fox Talbot ultimately had to use a box with a lens.

In 1928 the German sculpture professor Karl Blossfeldt published Urformen der Kunst (Archetypes of Art), his book of black-and-white plant studies to inspire his students Later colour attempts by other photographers to photograph plants in the same manner (with flat light to make them look like specimens) failed to equal, in my mind, the impact of Blossfeldt's photogravures or Talbot's photogenic drawings.

A scan is not a photo

Since 2002, I have scanned all of the roses in my garden and many of the other plants. I marvel at each one. Slowly I have come to understand why. Every time I scan I mentally tell myself that the two 8-inch matrix CCD line sensors (rated at 600 dpi per inch) record my plants with a cold cathode fluorescent lamp that mimics Blossfeldt's flat light. My two-year suspicion was finally confirmed (today!). An Epson technician told me: "There are no lenses, plastic or glass, on the CCDs. Light is bounced off the scanned object by the cold cathode light and the chips read both colour and shape." I have rid myself of the lens and the box.

"It is so natural to associate the idea of labour with great complexity and elaborate detail of execution, that one is struck at seeing the thousand florets of an Agrostis  [the flowers of common lawn grass] depicted with all its capillary branchlet …. for the objects that would take the most skilful artist days or weeks of labour to trace or to copy is effectively the boundless power of natural chemistry in the space of a few seconds."

-- W.H. F. Talbot, Some Account of the Art of Photogenic Drawing, 1839

 [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free.

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Is One Art or Design Skill You Wish to Learn?

Take this week's poll