Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.

How BC’s Soaring Real Estate Prices Made the Rich Richer

Inequality has been increased and entrenched, but progressive property taxes could help.

Alex Hemingway 11 Sep

Alex Hemingway is the public finance policy analyst at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives BC. This article first appeared in Policy Note here.

Many of us worry about income inequality in B.C., and so we should.

But as bad as income inequality is, wealth inequality is worse. And in our province, that wealth inequality is driven in large part by real estate — who owns it, and who doesn’t.

The ownership of real estate wealth in B.C. is highly unequal, even when it comes to principal residences. As debates unfold about the government’s speculation tax and extra school tax on properties over $3 million, this starting point of inequality in property wealth is important to understand.

To shed some light on the issue, let’s revisit an analysis that originally appeared in my colleague Marc Lee’s excellent 2016 report on B.C.’s housing crisis.

I updated a key chart below, using recent Statistics Canada data that was unavailable at the time of the report — StatsCan’s Survey of Financial Security, which offers a useful window on the concentration of property wealth in B.C.

The survey shows that the most affluent households own the bulk of real estate wealth in B.C. Specifically, the richest quintile — one fifth — of households now hold 62 per cent of the net worth of principal residences in B.C., and the top two quintiles together hold 87 per cent of this wealth. Note these “net worth” figures subtract outstanding mortgage debt from the value of the property.

The three least wealthy quintiles — 60 per cent of households — hold the measly remaining 13-per-cent share of principal residence net worth (and the bottom two quintiles hold almost none at all).

Quintiles are based on overall net worth of the family, including all assets and debts. Statistics Canada withholds precise estimates for the property wealth of the lowest quintile, but after subtracting the top four quintiles from the total, only about 0.1 per cent of the principal residence value is left to be attributed to the lowest quintile. Source: Survey of Financial Security, 2016.

Properties that are not the principal residence of the owner (classified as “other real estate” in the survey) are even more unequally distributed.

The top 20 per cent of households own 80 per cent of the net worth in this category, and the top two quintiles hold fully 95 per cent of this property wealth.

The upshot? Huge windfalls of land wealth we’ve seen in parts of B.C. recently have flowed largely to the affluent. To get a sense of the scale involved, consider that land value increases for single-family properties in the City of Vancouver were $47 billion in 2016 — double the income earned from actually working in the city that year (and about equal to the operating budget of the entire provincial government).

When you look province-wide, property wealth has grown by more than more than $1 trillion since 2007.

Given that the richest households own the large majority of real estate wealth, they gain by far the most from this bonanza. The housing affordability crisis we face in B.C. is also an inequality crisis — another manifestation of the growing gap between the rich and the rest of us.

Renters are shut out of property wealth gains entirely, of course, and face the double whammy of rising housing costs that accompany plummeting vacancy rates. Owners of modestly priced properties outside of red-hot real estate markets are also left in the dust compared to the biggest real estate winners.

Property wealth inequality is all the more unjust because the value of urban land is created collectively by all of us. Public investments in infrastructure like parks, schools and transportation make land in a given location highly sought after (and thus highly valued). Since land values — rather than building values — have skyrocketed in B.C., it’s clear that the biggest gains are not a result of private investments in home renovations and other building improvements.

This year the provincial government took some important steps that will help capture more of this massive land value for the public good, including the speculation tax and additional school tax on properties over $3 million.

The new taxes are quite narrowly targeted, requiring only one- to two-per-cent of the wealthiest property owners in B.C. to pay more. When you take stock of the extreme inequality of property wealth in B.C. — and the foundations of that wealth — these steps are clearly justified. My main criticism would be that, if anything, they don’t go far enough.

You can follow the links to read more of the CCPA’s analysis on the speculation tax and school tax, proposals for a more ambitious progressive property tax, and our recommendations on how to dramatically expand the creation of new social and co-operative housing in B.C.  [Tyee]

Read more: Politics, Housing

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context


The Barometer

Are You Concerned about AI?

Take this week's poll