The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles we’ll post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

There’s a reason why our site is unique and why we don’t have to rely on those tactics — our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, we’ve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

Fewer than 1 in 100 of our average monthly readers are signed up to Tyee Builders. If we reach 1% of our readers signing up to be Tyee Builders, we could continue to grow and do even more.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.
Before you click away, we have something to ask you…

Do you value independent journalism that focuses on the issues that matter? Do you think Canada needs more in-depth, fact-based reporting? So do we. If you’d like to be part of the solution, we’d love it if you joined us in working on it.

The Tyee is an independent, paywall-free, reader-funded publication. While many other newsrooms are getting smaller or shutting down altogether, we’re bucking the trend and growing, while still keeping our articles free and open for everyone to read.

The reason why we’re able to grow and do more, and focus on quality reporting, is because our readers support us in doing that. Over 5,000 Tyee readers chip in to fund our newsroom on a monthly basis, and that supports our rockstar team of dedicated journalists.

Join a community of people who are helping to build a better journalism ecosystem. You pick the amount you’d like to contribute on a monthly basis, and you can cancel any time.

Help us make Canadian media better by joining Tyee Builders today.
We value: Our readers.
Our independence. Our region.
The power of real journalism.
We're reader supported.
Get our newsletter free.
Help pay for our reporting.

Suzuki Backlash Shows Risks of Universities’ Dependence on Corporate Donors

University of Alberta’s honourary degree for anti-pipeline environmentalist brings threats of cash cuts.

By Mel Rothenburger 2 May 2018 |

Mel Rothenburger is a retired editor of the Daily News in Kamloops and former Kamloops mayor. He runs This column originally appeared there and on CFJC Today.

Some of our friends from next door should take a pill. They’re so overwrought they’re losing their focus, snapping like a blind dog without a bone.

Albertans are peeved over the Trans Mountain pipeline standoff, and that’s OK. But things got silly last week when a vocal number of them became all agitated over plans by the University of Alberta to give environmentalist David Suzuki an honourary doctorate.

Suzuki, of course, is a staunch and frequent critic of the Alberta tarsands and a strong advocate of alternative energy.

To listen to the outrage over there, you’d think he was an enemy of the people.

According to the U of A’s dean of engineering, Fraser Forbes, the Suzuki flap is “the worst crisis we’ve faced in more than three decades.”

Opposition leader Jason Kenney claimed Suzuki “makes millions defaming the livelihood of hundreds of thousands of Albertans.”

I heard W. Brett Wilson, formerly of the Dragons’ Den, on CBC’s The Current a couple of days ago going on at length about what a bad guy Suzuki is.

Albertans, apparently, are feeling “hurt.” Letters to the editor talk of “a slap in the face.” Some corporate and personal donations to the university are being withdrawn. One paper, the Estevan Mercury in Saskatchewan, which supports Alberta on the pipeline, predicted “Hell will freeze over before any oilman makes a personal donation to the U of A after this fiasco.”

The university, however, is standing pat. “Universities must not be afraid of controversy. Instead, we must be its champion,” stated president David Turpin in an open letter.

This is really much ado about nothing. In the grand scheme of things, whether or not Suzuki gets another honourary doctorate is neither here nor there. He already has two dozen of them. He has the Order of Canada, the Order of British Columbia and was once chosen as the greatest living Canadian in a poll conducted by the CBC.

One of his honourary degrees, by the way, came from the University of Calgary. Here at home, UBC and Simon Fraser have both given him one. Maybe Thompson Rivers University will be next.

Suzuki, to be sure, is not everybody’s favourite fellow. He’s opinionated. He’s strident. According to some, he can be arrogant and rude at times. Accusations are regularly made about his alleged real estate holdings (which he occasionally takes the time to refute). He gets lambasted for supposed hypocrisy because he flies to places on planes — which use a lot of fossil fuel — to criticize the fossil fuel industry. That’s not the point.

Neither is the fact he’s the most accomplished and recognized environmentalist in the country, nor that the energy sector isn’t his only target. (He also actively pursues issues relating to immigration policies, food security, safe water for First Nations, species at risk, the plastics problem, healthy living — the list goes on.)

The point is that universities have a right to hand fancy pieces of paper to anyone they want. They can also accept corporate donations until the sun goes down, all the while proclaiming academic freedom.

On the other hand, corporations also have the right to donate, or not to donate, to their universities of choice. If a university cheeses them off, it’s their business if they stop giving. It may be shortsighted, but it’s their money.

But good lord, if corporate donations are going to be clawed back over something as unimportant as an honourary doctorate to an unpopular environmentalist, what will happen when something really serious happens?

The Suzuki uproar demonstrates just how fragile the financing of universities is. So strapped are they for cash, so inadequate is their public funding, that they would close their doors without philanthropic and corporate money.

One need look no further than our own Thompson Rivers University for proof. Next time you’re on campus, count the number of plaques that name buildings, wings, theatres and classrooms after wealthy donors and corporations. You don’t get your name on something at TRU for volunteer work; you get it for being a good donor.

There’s nothing inherently wrong with that — corporations do a tremendous amount of good supporting various causes — but it sets up the potential for exactly what’s going on at the University of Alberta. Make your benefactors mad at your peril.

Suzuki’s honourary certificate isn’t important. The issue of reliance on corporate support by universities is the big issue here, and our arm-flapping Henny Penny friends over the Rockies are painting a clear picture of how tenuous a gossamer it really is.  [Tyee]

Share this article

The Tyee is supported by readers like you

Join us and grow independent media in Canada

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Do not:

  •  Use sexist, classist, racist or homophobic language
  • Libel or defame
  • Bully, threaten, name-call or troll
  • Troll patrol. Instead, downvote, or flag suspect activity
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities


  • Verify facts, debunk rumours
  • Add context and background
  • Spot typos and logical fallacies
  • Highlight reporting blind spots
  • Ignore trolls and flag violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity
  • Stay on topic
  • Connect with each other


The Barometer

Tyee Poll: What Coverage Would You Like to See More of This Year?

Take this week's poll